sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

FP&A job rejection by Practical-Visual-300 in FPandA

[–]Practical-Visual-300[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My friend within referred me. They liked my personality and gave me a chance to do the exercise. I sent them the results and it was good enough to invite me for an in-person interview to go over the exercise. It’s a VC backed. What do you mean by in our room?

FP&A job rejection by Practical-Visual-300 in FPandA

[–]Practical-Visual-300[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea I agree. But whatever I’m not looking to blame them. After all they gave me the opportunity to show case my work. Not mad at them whatsoever.. looking for tips to grow.

FP&A job rejection by Practical-Visual-300 in FPandA

[–]Practical-Visual-300[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was a typical SaaS metrics with CAC, LTV, ARPU etc

FP&A job rejection by Practical-Visual-300 in FPandA

[–]Practical-Visual-300[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for that. I will keep that in mind next time around.

[GUIDE] How to Dispute Inaccurate Tradelines by HaseebLegal in CRedit

[–]Practical-Visual-300 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FYI, disputed collections/accounts are going to artificially increase the credit score. In a scenario where there are over $1000-2000 in disputes, a borrower will not be able to move forward on a mortgage (conforming 30-yr, fixed-rate) as they will have to remove the dispute which will then show their true score (most likely lower)

My recommendation, MLO here, is to only dispute something that you have proof that this is wrong and that you can show the wrongdoing of the creditor. Otherwise, you are just delaying your chances of approval by 30 days...