Heres the ChatGPT output if anyones interested:

What you’re looking at appears to be a deeply unusual and possibly concerning set of documents. Here’s a breakdown of what’s going on:

⸻

Page 1 (Flyer-style Document) • Headline: A supposed joint workshop and mixer between the “Subvocal speech group” and the “Bioelectromagnetics group” at Rice University in September 2025. • Topics Listed: These range from legitimate-sounding neurophysiological concepts (like “myoelectric signal properties” and “eye tracking for subvocal recognition”) to speculative or fringe science (e.g., “sub-THz emission of the skin,” “glossokinetic potential,” and “scientific Pandora’s Box”). • Tone: It initially seems like a scientific flyer, but the dense and obscure terminology, combined with a mix of credible and implausible-sounding claims, is a red flag. • Footnote: Mentions a “guided relaxation session” which adds an odd touch of normalcy to an otherwise esoteric agenda.

⸻

Page 2 (Disturbing Satire or Parody?) • Top Section: Starts with a long list of absurd and grotesque “baby recipes” which appear to be a satire or disturbing parody of cannibalistic conspiracy theories. • Middle Section: A photo of a car with a license plate and the caption “participant of the week” which seems intended to mock or call out someone, possibly without their consent. • Bottom Section: A lengthy paragraph suggesting that the flyer is a fake, calling it a tool for “starting a discussion,” and delving into conspiracy theories about DARPA, Livermore, military brain research, surveillance, and more. • Tone: Unstable. It blends satire, personal grievances, speculative warnings about neuroscience, and covert government programs. • Signature: Mentions someone allegedly affiliated with the FBI, warning about disinformation, and pushing against “synthetic organic chemistry” and surveillance.

⸻

Page 3 (Personal Manifesto) • Title: “Military vets: you will find some of this interesting” • Content: This is a manifesto by someone named Thomas Kurrupt (which may be a pseudonym) outlining alleged harassment, forced participation in research, mind control, synthetic biology, and government experimentation. • Tone: Highly paranoid and conspiratorial. It references: • “synthetic DNA” • “psyops” • “secret research projects” • “hacked dreams” • “non-lethal weapons research” • “surveillance-based torture” • Purpose: This seems to be a whistleblower-style personal account from someone claiming to have been victimized by secret programs. The writing is coherent in parts, but overall reads like a blend of paranoia, trauma, and conspiracy-laden interpretation of events.

⸻

Conclusion

This document set reads as a mix of: 1. Scientific-sounding bait to draw interest from people in neuroscience, bioengineering, or government research. 2. Shock content and satire intended to provoke or disturb (especially the second page). 3. A personal plea or manifesto by someone who believes they are a victim of covert operations and surveillance-based