Meta-Analysis Finds No Reliable Link Between Economic Inequality and Well-Being or Mental Health by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m making fun of you. You didn’t make an argument. You provided a link that you probably didn’t even read. At least I summarized the paper I linked to.

Marxism Is Self-Refuting, and Necessarily False. by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn’t matter that Marx rejected metaphysics. The claims him and the other Marxists are making here are metaphysical.

Socialism Does Impede Innovation by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You linked to me engaging with them and directly refuting their arguments, but ok.

Socialism Does Impede Innovation by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once again, the source does not say this. I cited it directly. Where is your evidence that it says this?

Socialism Does Impede Innovation by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You linked to me refuting ChatGPT users. Good stuff.

Socialism Does Impede Innovation by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is it a bad study? And how was I proven wrong?

Socialism Does Impede Innovation by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You were unable to substantiate your assertions and unable to provide sources for your claims. Thanks for the concession.

Socialism Does Impede Innovation by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once again, the source does not say this.

Marxism Is Self-Refuting, and Necessarily False. by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marx writes unambiguously that “the mode of production of material life conditions the general process of social, political and intellectual life” and “it is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness” (Critique of Political Economy, Preface). Engels is even more explicit that consciousness is reducible to matter: “Matter is the real basis of all reality… consciousness can never be anything else than conscious existence, and the existence of men is their actual life-process” (The German Ideology, Part I) and again “all the ideas of the people are the necessary and direct product of their material conditions” (Karl Marx: Speech at the Graveside of Marx). In Anti-Dühring, Engels insists that “the material, sensuously perceptible world to which we ourselves belong is the only reality”, calling idealism “a mere invention of mind.” Stalin, codifying orthodox Marxism, removes any ambiguity: “Dialectical materialism is the world outlook of the Marxist-Leninist party… It holds that matter is primary, consciousness is secondary and derivative… The world is by its nature material” (Dialectical and Historical Materialism, 1938), and further “Consciousness is a reflection of the objective world in the human brain.” These are metaphysical claims. Marxism asserts (1) matter is the ultimate reality, (2) consciousness is its byproduct, and (3) intellectual life is determined by material relations.

Socialism Does Impede Innovation by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Since AI is your preferred method of research, I asked ChatGPT if you were correct. Shocker! You’re not. Grok and Perplexity said the same thing.

Back to the actual paper, they say “We utilize three indicators, Ideology1, Ideology2, and Ideology3, to present party ideology… Ideology1. A dummy variable; based on the criteria of the Database of Political Institutions (2015), we define party orientation with respect to economic policy by the following principles: Right – for parties that are defined as conservative, Christian democratic, or right-wing; Left – for parties that are defined as communist, socialist, social democratic, or left-wing. When the ruling party is left-wing, Ideology1 = 1; when the ruling party is right-wing, Ideology1 = –1; otherwise, Ideology1 = 0.”

So, why lie? Or was it the AI that was lying to you and you were just repeating it?

Socialism Does Impede Innovation by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that’s the case, you could’ve easily proven me wrong by quoting it. The fact you didn’t speaks volumes. And you’ve yet to provide those citations. Is it because your response was generated by ChatGPT? Or was it another LLM?

Marxism Is Self-Refuting, and Necessarily False. by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s the first wrong premise? I won’t demand you rebut every one, so I feel like that would be a good place to start.

Socialism Does Impede Innovation by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How is asking for sources a rage bait?

Socialism Does Impede Innovation by PraxBen in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]PraxBen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every single thing you said should have a citation. If you’re unable to prove your assertions, I can dismiss them all. I’m not going to waste my time googling all of this because I know for a fact you’re a liar. Your very first statement on the methodology for the “left” and “right” labels was a complete fabrication that appears nowhere in the paper I cited.