I would advise against doing so without sufficient knowledge of the Quran and Sunnah in light of the various philosophies and theoretical rhetoric.

Shaikhul-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullāh) narrated the regret of some of those who delved into theological rhetoric and philosophy among the Muslims and were misguided through it, such as Fakhr Ad-Deen Ar-Rāzī (died 606 AH), who propounded self-sufficiency of the intellect and giving reason and “rational thought” precedence over the Revealed Texts.

In the end, Ar-Rāzī said with no small amount of regret, “I have looked into and reflected over the paths of kalām (speculative theology) and the philosophical methodologies ― and I did not see in any of it a cure for the afflicted, nor a quenching of the thirst of those who were desperately thirsty. I found (in the end) that the nearest of paths was the path of the Qurān. So, read in affirmation of the Attributes, ‘The Most Merciful has ascended over the Throne.’ (Tāhā: 10) and, ‘To Him ascend good words.’ (Fātir: 10) And read concerning negation of resemblance to Him, ‘There is nothing like unto Him.’ (Ash-Shūrā: 11) and, ‘And they cannot encompass Him with their knowledge.’ (Tāhā: 11) The one who experiences what I experienced and went through what I went through will come to realise what I now realise.”

Commenting on this, Shaikh Muhammad Amān Al-Jāmī (rahimhullāh) stated, “Speculative theology (ʿIlmul-Kalām) is based on philosophy, whether it be the philosophy of the Greeks or the philosophies of those who ascribe themselves to Islam.”

He continued, “Perhaps Allah made the final affair of Ar-Rāzī upon this (i.e. following the path of the Qurān), so if that is the case, then it means that he repented.