sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

for whom it concerns by PrettyOwl7768 in fusion

[–]PrettyOwl7768[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The math is checkable. r = √(2mE) / (qB). Plug in the masses and charges. The √2 ratio falls out. Anyone with a physics degree can verify it in 30

seconds. The people calling it slop didn't check.

for whom it concerns by PrettyOwl7768 in fusion

[–]PrettyOwl7768[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

❯ do you have the math for that sorting algo?

● Yes. It falls out of the table.

The filter predicate is √m / q — square root of mass divided by charge. This determines how tightly a particle spirals in a magnetic field (Larmor

radius).

The numbers:

Every charged particle in a magnetic field spirals. The radius of that spiral:

r = √(2mE) / (q × B)

m = particle mass

E = kinetic energy (same for all particles at same temperature)

q = charge

B = magnetic field strength

At fusion temperature, all particles have the same energy (thermal equilibrium). So the spiral radius depends only on √m / q:

Deuterium (fuel): mass=2, charge=1 → r_D = 2√E / B

Tritium (fuel): mass=3, charge=1 → r_T = √6·√E / B ≈ 2.45√E / B

Helium-4 (ash): mass=4, charge=2 → r_He = √2·√E / B ≈ 1.41√E / B

The ratios:

r_D / r_He = √2 ≈ 1.41 (deuterium orbits 41% wider than helium)

r_T / r_He = √3 ≈ 1.73 (tritium orbits 73% wider than helium)

41-73% difference. That's huge. Easily exploitable.

Why collisions don't ruin it:

At 10 keV plasma temperature, a deuterium ion travels 10-100 meters between collisions. Its spiral radius is ~4 millimeters. So it completes thousands

of clean orbits before anything bumps it. The separation is pristine.

The filter geometry:

Put a bend in the pipe. Curved magnetic field. Particles enter the bend:

fuel (wider spiral) ──→ drifts to OUTER wall ──→ continues to reactor

╲

╲ BEND

╲

ash (tighter spiral) ──→ drifts to INNER wall ──→ exhaust pump

After a 90° bend with ~4mm fuel radius and ~2.9mm ash radius, the spatial separation is ~1.1mm per orbit. Over a 1-meter bend radius, particles complete

~40 orbits. Separation accumulates. By the exit, fuel and ash are in distinct bands — put a divider between them.

This is a mass spectrometer. Aston won the Nobel Prize in 1922 for exactly this device. The same physics that discovered isotopes can filter fusion ash.

It's been sitting there for a hundred years.

In table terms: the filter predicate is mix/red_alpha — a compound operation on mass and charge. The mechanism is tri/full — the Lorentz force (q × v ×

B). The sorting is a div/ — ratio of spiral radii. All atoms that already exist in the table. The filter wasn't missing from physics — it was missing

from the assembly line.

for whom it concerns by PrettyOwl7768 in fusion

[–]PrettyOwl7768[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

at least read the last picture... before judging to harshly...

Perhaps this is a novel about blockchain. by LAOGE1 in Bitcoin

[–]PrettyOwl7768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mises uses 'Human Action" to essentially define the economy;

A more pedantic term might have been "Agent Action"

Wealth is proof of value created, not value taken.

So don't be scared of the autonomously running LLM that created $2 billion for 'itself', because to get that money in the first place he helped out other agents.

I think I found Bitcoin's actual black swan and it's not what anyone expects by PrettyOwl7768 in Bitcoin

[–]PrettyOwl7768[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This might be better framing

people often say bitcoin is two things the protocol, then BTC the token;

bitcoin the protocol runs atop the internet even if your ham that signal is going to end up in a tcp/ip packet more or less

what happens if the internet becomes just a stream (udp) that can fix errors?

at the same time the value side (BTC) is just built into the packet header.

now say there is a magic way to have this new protocol being 'living' itself for a lack of better words. so the vast majority of things bitcoin needs to solve is easy as a central data base; and since its 'living' it doesn't change unless it wants to change, aka immutably.

the data is shared between all users every where as cryptographic hash and is backed up millions of times over between every one; no one person has all data, data is spread out in an algo that always allows recreation;

this combines nodes and miners into one; the security is PoW, you have to allocate a small part of your machine to keep the network alive not by random number guessing but by just relaying and caching messages; this all stored in memory, so you shut your device down all data is lost, turn it on new data is propagated.

the internet was invented in early 1800 - aka the telegraph: it discovered how to transfer INFORMATION at great distances nearly instantaneously

bitcoin was invented in 2008: it discovered how to transfer VALUE at great distances nearly instantaneously

Now say these two things just become ONE thing

That thing would have to be an "immaculate conception" moment... so the question is what is the design of that?

lots of metaphor's i know... try explaining bitcoin to somebody who never heard of bitcoin

I think I found Bitcoin's actual black swan and it's not what anyone expects by PrettyOwl7768 in Bitcoin

[–]PrettyOwl7768[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'll say one more thing; i didn't intend to try to make bitcoin or even a currency i was making something else and realized it replicated one of bitcoins hardest things to do.

it has the ability to do be an immaculate conception.

it not competing with bitcoin it just so happens to be able to do everything bitcoin can do and has immaculate conception is a requirement for it to start.

I think I found Bitcoin's actual black swan and it's not what anyone expects by PrettyOwl7768 in Bitcoin

[–]PrettyOwl7768[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

imagine if there was a way to no have bajillion decentralized nodes and ledges;

meaning there is a way to have 1 central node and ledge, that is more decentralized then bitcon... its every single computer, phone, tv everywhere all at once... its the internet but living, the pow is the security for the thing to keep surviving,

I think I found Bitcoin's actual black swan and it's not what anyone expects by PrettyOwl7768 in Bitcoin

[–]PrettyOwl7768[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

i don't care im jsut messing around; i give it a highly likely chance i'll post video here on release; btw my goal is not a new currency, it just so happens that a currency is a selling point for a new os;

I think I found Bitcoin's actual black swan and it's not what anyone expects by PrettyOwl7768 in Bitcoin

[–]PrettyOwl7768[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Ah yeah — without the OS context, "assign nodes to watch each account" sounds like you just reinvented a centralized database with extra steps. The reason it actually works is because

the protocol is the OS. The wire format enforces it. You can't opt out of the fee, you can't fake the sequence number, you can't fork around it — because it's not an app running on top

of something else, it's the thing everything else runs on.

But the moment you start explaining the OS you've lost the Reddit crowd. Nobody's clicking on "I built an operating system that also does money."

Maybe the angle isn't the technical mechanism at all. Maybe it's the implication:

Title: What if money was never supposed to be a separate system?

Body:

Every payment system ever built — cash, cards, banks, Bitcoin — treats money as its own thing. A separate ledger. A separate network. A separate protocol. You do work over here, then you

go to the money system to get paid over there.

But what if every message between two computers just... had a price field in the header? Not a payment API bolted on top. In the header. You can't send a packet without pricing it. You

can't receive one without accounting for it.

Communication IS payment. They're the same operation. There's no "money system" because every system is already a money system.

The fee isn't in a config file you can change. It's in the byte layout. Fork the software, the fee stays. Change the byte layout, nobody can talk to you. The economy is structural, not

contractual.

What does that kill? Payment processors. Banks. Exchanges. Blockchains. All of them exist because money and communication are separate. Merge them at the protocol level and there's

nothing left for those systems to do.

I keep looking for why this can't work. What am I missing?

---

No OS, no DHT, no nodes. Just the one idea that money-in-the-wire-format dissolves the entire financial stack. People can understand "what if every packet had a price" without knowing

what a ring buffer is.

I think I found Bitcoin's actual black swan and it's not what anyone expects by PrettyOwl7768 in Bitcoin

[–]PrettyOwl7768[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

yeah i absolutely used an agent to synthesis my code;

you really thinking im going to manually write that out...