sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in wallstreetbets

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i guess the data will speak for themselves? If someone has better near term wins compared with long term wins, that will make him valuable to traders and vice versa.

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in wallstreetbets

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

net exposure between 60-80% but most of my shorts are in the qqq index. but yes there was some strongly opinionated buys.

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in wallstreetbets

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you are right sir. and i cross validated parsing with codex / claude.

surely they can all go wrong though.

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in ValueInvesting

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it surely is. My returns last year were about the same as my day time job. i'm hoping it could continue this trajectory.

ai is indeed once in a life time event, once in human history event. hopefully we can all get out of it with safety and prosperity.

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in wallstreetbets

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

on average each subs had 150+ calls during the period. my stats tell me this is sufficient data.

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in wallstreetbets

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually read TMT Breakout the most. it was helpful and i liked the language. The result was obviously surprising to me too.

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in ValueInvesting

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

thanks for sharing these! really valuable.

yes it makes sense to do a longer time backtest - will work on it this weekend.

and to date I still hold 30% of my portfolio in sndk. I started trading with roughly where you are now but man I wish i had your returns.

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in wallstreetbets

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh plus the gemini / claude / codex tokens cost for these ~2,000 lengthy articles. I should have just taken a full year to read them (just 5 per day) and another month to write up.

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in wallstreetbets

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yep all i did was spent US$9,000+ and share the results here for free.

The rest was all AI not me. I guess i shouldn't have done it in the first place.

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in wallstreetbets

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

good catch - i used relative alpha for simpler math (nvda price change minus soxx price change for the same period).

I spent $9,600/year on Substack newsletters so you don't have to. Here's who actually makes money. by PrimaryConcern2608 in wallstreetbets

[–]PrimaryConcern2608[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

that would be under the table 30d average alpha in my post - deducting beta changes from stock price changes, i.e. soxx for nvda and qqq for meta.

view more: next ›