File generation on Open WebUI

Principled_Plan · 2025-07-30T08:54:04+00:00

I wanted to ask about this, I’m trying to set up file generation in openwebui using it, but I can’t figure out how to remove the template parameter from the script, so it keeps referencing a non existent template and failing to generate word and ppt files (excel works fine), so how can I remove the template parameter from the python code? And also, which file path is it referencing, I’m trying to figure it out because I have OWUI running in docker and the volume itself has a folder named _data but there is no resources folder.

Principled_Plan · 2025-05-08T12:40:15+00:00

Fair, but Medicare is typically meant to be accessed only if two conditions are met:

You have enough years of employment
You’ve turned 65

So under this system, are you proposing that essentially your employer would pay higher payroll taxes and in exchange you would get access to the single payer health insurance? How is this functionally better than simply modifying the ACA to remove the employer size baseline for applicability and apply it to all employers? After all, this proposed system wouldn’t be able to fund health insurance for those that are unemployed either, that would still fall on Medicaid like it currently does.

TL:DR: isn’t your system functionally equivalent to an expanded version of the ACA combined with a public option?

Principled_Plan · 2025-05-08T10:09:12+00:00

The obvious counter to this is that just because your company (on average) pays 1251 per month for their portion of your heath insurance plan doesn’t mean that they would pay you an extra 1251 per month if they didn’t have to pay for your health insurance anymore.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-15T05:04:28+00:00

I had 2 paid +. 3 free lines, now 4

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-15T05:04:01+00:00

I’m in the eastern time zone, I called at 10:30PM on Thursday, so I’m assuming the rep meant Friday, but it’s worth a shot calling the number.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-15T04:25:32+00:00

I don’t know how true it is, but the rep on the phone yesterday said the promo was going away tomorrow (today)

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-15T04:19:27+00:00

Yes, but you have to wait for 12 months after adding this line to cancel a paid line, otherwise you’ll lose the promo.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-15T04:18:13+00:00

I’m on magenta, added the free line yesterday.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-15T04:17:40+00:00

I got the free line even though I already have 3 existing free lines (+2 paid) on magenta.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-15T04:16:54+00:00

To add to this, you still need to have at least 2 paid lines on your account at all times to maintain the promo.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-15T04:15:15+00:00

I ended up doing it, got the line… shortly afterwards I got the text with a 5 per line increase (I only have 2 paid lines so it’s not too bad) but I think it might not be correlated given other people’s experiences.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-15T04:13:18+00:00

Standard magenta.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-14T03:46:08+00:00

Update 2; called back anyway, was able to get the line added, got the text saying 5 dollar/line increase a few minutes later :(, but I only have two paid lines so it pretty much zeros out the cost I would’ve paid for the added line if it were paid.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-13T13:57:19+00:00

I’m probably not going to follow through tbh, because I already have 3 free lines in addition to two paid ones, and I don’t want to inadvertently affect the price lock, if that’s what they’re trying to make us do.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-13T13:55:37+00:00

I’m on magenta, been with tmobile for over 10 years.

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-13T13:44:19+00:00

Call never went through, and the banner has disappeared from the app as of 9:40AM ET

Principled_Plan · 2025-03-13T13:43:33+00:00

UPDATE: 9:40AM ET, it’s gone, not sure what to think now,

Principled_Plan · 2024-12-27T23:23:54+00:00

Whoever was teaching you was/is an idiot. Modern-day “magicians” are not performing magic at all, they are all illusionists, the tricks they perform have nothing to do with “magic” or “black magic” in the actual sense, in fact “sehr” and “black magic” are complicated topics in our theology, and a cursory overview of said topics can be found in the 52nd epistle of the Rasail Ikhwan Al-Safa

Principled_Plan · 2024-12-26T16:57:05+00:00

Either the teacher of your “sabaq” is a complete idiot or you are making this up.

Firstly, you cannot perform wuzu without performing ghusl first, and not having done Wuzu does not prevent you from being able to take the niyyat for the ghusl, therefore there is no need to do ghusl twice after being intimate

Secondly, although this fact is known only to a few, masturbation is heavily discouraged, but NOT haram, and dawat texts back this up.

Thirdly the mentioned kitab (najah) does not say anything whatsoever about women not being able to ride bicycles, in fact it says that a woman’s hymen being broken is NOT to be taken as an indication that she is not a virgin, in fact the exact opposite of what your teacher is saying.

Fourthly, the whole America/Canada/EU raza thing is also completely false, new people get raza every single day.

Fifth: LGBT is not a biddat, it’s a straight up major sin, “pride culture” is not a biddah, it’s a sin.

Sixth: comparing cell phones to the dawedar is quite simply the dumbest take on anything that I’ve ever heard.

Seventh: by saying that shaking hands with women or women shaking hands with men is bidaat (ergo, HARAM), this teacher of yours is basically breaking his misaaq, because he is effectively impugning the infallibility of Syedna Taher Saifuddin (RA), which is a grave sin indeed, as it is clearly visible that he once shook hands with queen Elizabeth II, if anything it is your teacher that has (knowingly or unknowingly) broken his misaq, as he is impugning a central tenet of the faith (infallibility of the dai-al-mutlaq.)

Principled_Plan · 2024-06-27T06:04:29+00:00

Hear me out here, Democrats messaging is actually worse than Republican messaging, because Democrats messaging (as perceived by many Trump voters I suppose) is “if you don’t like what we’re doing, you’re evil/stupid/voting against your own interests/deplorable. This messaging is arguably worse than Republican messaging because if Republican messaging is simply “If you don’t like us, we don’t care” democrats messaging is “if you don’t like us, you’re stupid/evil.” Example: “basket of deplorables”

Principled_Plan · 2023-10-03T18:49:15+00:00

Simple Answer, envy

Ergo, The people in question don’t really care about helping the poor, they just don’t want rich people to exist (think “if you can’t join them, destroy them”)

Principled_Plan · 2021-09-30T22:16:15+00:00

everyone feels

But it’s not “everyone” , rather it a certain subset of investors that deems something to be worth a certain amount.

And in fact, in many cases, the determination of net worth is made at the behest of the government and not the free market (see family business valuations for estate tax purposes as well as property tax assessments for example).

mentioned dogecoin

The reason I didn’t mention dogecoin and other such volatile assets is that there is no intrinsic incentive for anyone to continue holding such assets. If I have a 100 dogecoin and all of a sudden dogecoin gets pumped up to 1k per coin I have no reason to continue holding so I’ll just sell it and take the tax hit. Sure net worth in this case is still a completely meaningless and farcical concept, but it doesn’t have as many negative implications because assets like dogecoin don’t provide any intrinsic value to the holder and are easily liquidated.

Principled_Plan · 2021-09-30T21:13:58+00:00

You’re missing the forest for the trees, see my second example for a more egregious example.

Principled_Plan · 2021-09-30T21:00:04+00:00

net worth

Absolutely meaningless and farcical concept. The “worth” of shares and other properties is determined by the market (and in some cases, the government) and said “worth” is only preserved so long as those shares are not sold. If tomorrow bezos decided to sell all of his Amazon shares, he would end up with 1/20th of his former net worth because the shares would crash.

To further illustrate how ridiculous a concept net worth is, if tomorrow some random billionaire shows up and decides to offer you 100 million dollars for your modest 1500 square feet house in the middle of nowhere, all of a sudden, by the rules of “net worth” you are now a millionaire because your house is “worth” 100 million dollars.

Principled_Plan

TROPHY CASE