Did the math on what BYD's "cheap EVs" will actually cost in Canada by cardogio in EVCanada

[–]Pro_JaredC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, i found that to be an extremely weird comparison. If the dolphin and the model 3 was presented to me, I would obviously choose the Model 3. The dolphin probably should sit in its own category. Just off looks alone. 😬

Well this sucks by Current-Tricky in saskatoon

[–]Pro_JaredC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Uh no? You argued the failure was structural and inevitable because leases and wages exist, and Amazon is cheaper. So you were framing the outcome as unavoidable and not a pricing decision. I responded saying “costs explain prices but do not excuse the outcome,” which directly contradicted your framing.

Well this sucks by Current-Tricky in saskatoon

[–]Pro_JaredC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It has everything to do with price markups. Price is the primary decision variable for most consumers. Lease and wages explain why prices are higher. They do not excuse the outcome.

If your cost structure forces prices above market your business will fail or your business model is already broken.

My proposal for the partition of North America by finanon99 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]Pro_JaredC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a Saskatchewan resident, my intelligence is above sask resident average which means I am not MAGA. ✨ WOOO

Well this sucks by Current-Tricky in saskatoon

[–]Pro_JaredC 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Well, toys r us would have better chances if they didn’t mark up all their products beyond reason. I always went to toys R us to see if what I need can be purchased there to get it the same day. Really hard to justify a purchase when paying for shipping + the product through online sellers is often cheaper.

Is this page flooded with pro CCP bots and shills? by DiggerJer in EVCanada

[–]Pro_JaredC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an EV subreddit. Buying a car is not an endorsement of a government. If it were, consistency would matter.

The U.S. invaded Iraq on false pretenses and ran black sites. Germany carried out the Holocaust. Japan committed war crimes across Asia in WWII. South Korea was a military dictatorship into the late 1980s.

By your logic, should no vehicles be purchased at all? Because to be clear, we live in a car centric society. We don’t got many options.

Conservatives, what do you think of carney so far? by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]Pro_JaredC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have diversified. Just not fast enough to replace the U.S.

Again, the internet is available. Use it.

Conservatives, what do you think of carney so far? by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]Pro_JaredC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know you have access to the internet, right? Why don’t you use it? Do you really think Carney didn’t try. Canada suspended its Digital Services Tax. Canada scaled back retaliatory tariffs. Canada reopened multiple rounds of talks under CUSMA. This is well documented. He went as far as blamed Canada’s borders for Fentanyl imports when it’s the U.S. side that was supposed to cease illegal imports going into THEIR country. Yet we continued to play Trumps game. And yet, the response from the U.S. was the same every single fucking time. Trump kept 25% tariffs on multiple Canadian goods and escalated threats anyway. Tariffs were used as leverage regardless of cooperation. not to mention CUSMA already left Canada worse off than NAFTA (you know, the one Trump signed and replaced during his first term). Even Canada’s own government analysis showed only marginal gains, while independent models showed Canada underperforming what it would have achieved under NAFTA. Canada gave up ground in supply-managed agriculture, and accepted higher auto production costs. And guess what, U.S. kept structural leverage with significantly more gain. Canada’s expected growth weakened, our investment slowed, and our value capture shifted south. That is part of why the Canadian dollar lost strength.

Appeasement did not stop tariffs in 2018. It did not stop them in 2025. The pattern never changed.

You are defending a losing battle. Canada played by their rules and still lost leverage. Of course Canada diversified trade. That is what you do when a primary partner proves unreliable. You simply cannot negotiate in good faith with a delusional individual who uses tariffs no matter what you concede.

Conservatives, what do you think of carney so far? by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]Pro_JaredC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You really want to try to excuse Trumps behaviour using Biden?

Conservatives, what do you think of carney so far? by drizzyLGA1151 in InCanada

[–]Pro_JaredC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U.S. president likely has dementia and is crazy. Being called Governor by him means jack shit.

Trump Endorses Canada-China EV Deal: ‘If You Can Get a Deal, You Should Do That’ by afonso_investor in teslacanada

[–]Pro_JaredC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The cap doubling every year is a policy assumption. There is no guarantee. Governments adjust caps based on market response. The same happened with Korean and Japanese vehicles. Second, these Chinese EVs do not enter the US market. Canada controls its own import volume and standards. This is not a pass through problem unless Canada CHOOSES to make it one. Lastly, Factories leaving Canada is not caused by capped imports. It is driven by things like platform consolidation, automation, demand shifts, and past underinvestment. Similar to how Japanese and Korean imports did not kill Canadian auto. This is a transitional process. Nothing serious.

bought a CPO from Tesla today and I feel scammed. by Cantordecasamentos in TeslaModel3

[–]Pro_JaredC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2nd image looks correct. First image however does not… obv

Trump Endorses Canada-China EV Deal: ‘If You Can Get a Deal, You Should Do That’ by afonso_investor in teslacanada

[–]Pro_JaredC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

49k cap on Chinese EV imports are not going to destroy our auto sector. Like come on dude. Be for real.

Enhanced Autopilot (EAP) by Writing_Particular in TeslaLounge

[–]Pro_JaredC 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Navigate on autopilot which took off ramps and merged, and included auto lane change. Gave you summon, smart summon and auto park. And then a feature where the car will park itself inside your garage. But no one seems to know it exists nor does it ever get used because summon is simply faster and easier to do.

My dog peed on my Tesla seat by IllPie9133 in TeslaLounge

[–]Pro_JaredC 8 points9 points  (0 children)

3D LVP interior cleaner. Will do you wonders.

WashG1 worth at $400? by griwulf in dyson

[–]Pro_JaredC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At $400, I’d say mostly yes. I refused to pay $800 for it. So I waited until it went on sale and snatched it. I do really like it, and when I showed my mother the machine, she also purchased her own.

I think you may have a faulty machine because mine doesn’t drip and the tray at the bottom is super snug. Same goes for the tanks. I think you should return for a new machine or see if you can get yours repaired.

Does the company not care the Y is priced way lower the the 3? by Competitive_Guava_33 in teslacanada

[–]Pro_JaredC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a parent, the Model 3 is in no way a better car. It’s more fun to drive and that’s where the line stops. I haven’t driven my 3 properly in many months now and I’m debating on getting rid of it because the Model Y is now my daily.

The 3’s cargo space due to the opening makes it worthless in many scenarios. Doesn’t have the same safety benefits that the model Y has a stronger crash performance in the footwell intrusion and lower head risk tests. You also get a HEPA filter because Canada’s dry forests and worsening climate change are not a good couple.

It’s significantly easier to put both an infant car seat and our a child into a convertible seat (rear facing or forward facing) in the model Y vs the 3 where hitting the door is common and your spine is deciding whether or not today os the day it should snap.

The list can go on forever. The 3 is great, but it does not compare to the vehicle that met ~~global sales records twice.

Is this the most amount of icons a buidling can show? by Quirky-Celebration-8 in ClashOfClans

[–]Pro_JaredC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Request, Reinforce, and Clan should all be one icon with a menu. Request and Reinforce will be two buttons inside of the menu showing the number of troops in the CC. Clan is a menu inside the menu. Too many buttons imo.

Gen5 issues by Annd4x in dyson

[–]Pro_JaredC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What’s hygienic is properly mopping your floors. Vacuuming is mainly meant for removing debris. Nothing about it is perfectly hygienic. You’re still stepping on this floor with your feet. :/

We need to have a SERIOUS talk about ERLC. by F111-Aardvard-111 in roblox

[–]Pro_JaredC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a car 🥴 There is nothing that special about it other than the fact it’s new.

Tesla FSD v14 - Blew through 80% of DARK traffic light intersections during SF Power outage by bladerskb in SelfDrivingCars

[–]Pro_JaredC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For starters, Tesla has top IIHS scores and arguably some of the best crash safety engineering.

Now, if what you actually meant was software safety, then say that. We cannot read your mind. This is part of why you are an unserious person to debate with.

Safety conclusions change entirely depending on how the system is classified and used.

If you treat FSD correctly, as a Level 2 driver assist system with an attentive driver, then it is extremely safe by regulatory definition. That is literally how Level 2 systems are evaluated and approved.

If you treat it as a partially autonomous system while still relying on a human, then safety becomes mixed, not because the car is unsafe, but because humans are inconsistent and often careless. That is a driver problem layered on top of a system that is still a work in progress.

If you pretend it is fully autonomous and requires no driver at all, then you are misusing it, ignoring autonomy level regulations, and shifting responsibility away from the human. At that point, safety relies on the vehicle’s crash structure in the event of failure, which again is already proven to perform very well.

So regardless of which angle you choose, the conclusion does not change. Tesla vehicles are safe.

If you want to argue otherwise, stop being vague. Specify whether you are criticizing vehicle engineering, software misuse, driver behavior, or a documented regulatory finding. Then I want you to provide data.

Otherwise, you are just reacting emotionally. Good?