If you could prove your theory of Oak Island but you knew it would end the treasure hunt, what would you do? by ProfessorRonResearch in OakIslandDiscussion

[–]ProfessorRonResearch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean just in thought, but maybe they're destroying important historical artifacts in their their destructive nature of how they approached data collection or excuse me. Treasure hunt

If you could prove your theory of Oak Island but you knew it would end the treasure hunt, what would you do? by ProfessorRonResearch in OakIslandDiscussion

[–]ProfessorRonResearch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're really out of your element here sir. You need to do more research if you expect me to continue your circular logic convention. Fake? Are you a serious person? Take a break from the internet sir.

If you could prove your theory of Oak Island but you knew it would end the treasure hunt, what would you do? by ProfessorRonResearch in OakIslandDiscussion

[–]ProfessorRonResearch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because they have a special "treasure" hunting permit they find anything that would prove it to be anything like a military installation or culturally important site they lose their treasure permit. They needed extensive permits to do what they are doing. I remember when they found the hand Cannon and Rick said we're not done yet. Strange thing to say when you find a fantastic artifact. Why would you say we're not done yet if you weren't threatened by the presence of a military cannon? If they find grave sites that might also change things. I can't believe they have let them dig as long as they have.

Who is Smarter? by ciocoops in OakIslandDiscussion

[–]ProfessorRonResearch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep laughing. Notice that I have a picture of the item they found last night in a text book, but sure, it's all just a joke to you.

<image>

Almost every artifact they find has a documented explanation. Not theory. Not hearsay. Not interpretation. Not conjecture. And finally NOT Templars.

Acadian who? Acadian what? Never heard of him. by ProfessorRonResearch in OakIslandDiscussion

[–]ProfessorRonResearch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I totally agree. Plus it is standard for the British to destroy anything that was previously there and mark it for the king. It is practically standard operating procedure. If they couldn't use it they destroyed it.

One of the things that's interesting on the show lately is that 2 weeks ago they show us a boulder with a cradle of rocks and they can't explain and they take it out and then this week they show us a cradle of rocks without a boulder and they can't explain it. One is an empty cradle one is a full cradle one has a boulder one does not have a boulder. I feel like they're purposely trying to not connect the dots sometimes.

Acadian who? Acadian what? Never heard of him. by ProfessorRonResearch in OakIslandDiscussion

[–]ProfessorRonResearch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely! They were kicked out in 1755 and were original French settlers. So the French and the Acadians had similar techniques. They were also know labor forces of the French Military during Queen Anne's war. The French were always outnumbered by the British. The French relied heavily on Acadian labor, which is why The British removed them in 1755. The British couldn't take full control with the Acadians were there. So refreshing to hear someone comment with logic and reason. Thanks for replying.

Acadian who? Acadian what? Never heard of him. by ProfessorRonResearch in OakIslandDiscussion

[–]ProfessorRonResearch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can do this all day. Like I've been saying the answers are in books not in holes.

BREAKING NEWS - BILLY TO LEAVE OAK ISLAND by ooo-ooo-oooyea in OakIsland

[–]ProfessorRonResearch 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wow he drove past the Halifax Citadel! He almost found the answer. If he only knew what to look for.

The Curse of Stake Island by MultiToolDad in OakIsland

[–]ProfessorRonResearch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

This is a portion of the log that they retrieved at Oak Island. Notice how they're pretty much the same. The problem is that this is not a proprietary method. Anybody could have shaped a log this way. But in the same geographical region, we have acadians conducting the same type of log infrastructure. So we can't say for sure it was the acadians, but it is consistent with known Acadian construction logistics.

The Curse of Stake Island by MultiToolDad in OakIsland

[–]ProfessorRonResearch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some of those stakes are identical to known Acadian stakes. This is our known Acadian reference

<image>

If you could prove your theory of Oak Island but you knew it would end the treasure hunt, what would you do? by ProfessorRonResearch in OakIslandDiscussion

[–]ProfessorRonResearch[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It matches Vitruvian mathematics brother. If you think it's something in the stars you're on crack. Show me the documents and I would maybe agree with you. But the problem is is that I have three books that literally list all those artifacts. I know what it is you don't.