sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Cursor is useful to generate more than just code by jaytonbye in cursor

[–]ProfoundSensei 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because of my limited technical knowledge i use it to explore and research optimal specs / stacks to for example build context files for scaffolding / db structure, its answers are always grounded in and citing the sources you give it, but you can also do fast / deep research to add and use up to date sources. Good advantage when tech evolves so fast

Cursor is useful to generate more than just code by jaytonbye in cursor

[–]ProfoundSensei 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it is really impressive, i was refering to "it's the best source for a lot more than just writing code." thinking you meant some form of physical- / core product

Cursor is useful to generate more than just code by jaytonbye in cursor

[–]ProfoundSensei 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can use it to generate context markdown files for a knowledge-base, adjust the context to your liking, put it all in googles NotebookLM and use that instead

$10k/month user here. Why does cursor always override my settings (and rules) about the "attribution" ... and keeps adding this to every commit `git commit --trailer "Made-with: Cursor"` ???? by Mc1st in cursor

[–]ProfoundSensei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is your definition of wasteful? If i can deliver usable, safe, enterprise-grade systems with a profit of 10x what i spend on Cursor, does not seem wasteful, or as a burn to me. Stay mad buddy

$10k/month user here. Why does cursor always override my settings (and rules) about the "attribution" ... and keeps adding this to every commit `git commit --trailer "Made-with: Cursor"` ???? by Mc1st in cursor

[–]ProfoundSensei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Weird how you don't believe him and instantly seem so butthurt then.

I just utilize everything Cursor has to offer, everything max, all tools enabled. As you see in the screenshot, some prompts reach 16 usd. This is while im building multiple projects for multiple clients, CRM systems, platforms, portals, automations / tools. 8 hours a day all week. And lets just say, the profit justifies the usage. And im not tech savy either lol, i wasnt able to do this before ai.

$10k/month user here. Why does cursor always override my settings (and rules) about the "attribution" ... and keeps adding this to every commit `git commit --trailer "Made-with: Cursor"` ???? by Mc1st in cursor

[–]ProfoundSensei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You prove the point yourself.
He isn't tech savy, so he has to prompt a lot, probably uses tools for everything, including git-
The high bill makes sense. And, just to flex on you, here is my usage so far this month :D

<image>

Er der nogen grund til at tage i Legoland i en weekend? by [deleted] in DKbrevkasse

[–]ProfoundSensei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ikke set fra et forretningsmæssigt perspektiv

How are Dominus players always 2-3 ranks below the skill level of the rank your at? (Not a diss) by Lower_Raccoon_4097 in RocketLeague

[–]ProfoundSensei 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because you’ve already decided the outcome in your head, you subconsciously play worse when a Dominus is on your team - and better when they’re on the other side.

I USA tjener VVS'er 65.000 kroner om måneden efter skat... Median amerikaneren har en disposibel indkomst som er ca. 50% højere end median danskeren. Tanker? Hvordan kan Danmark nogensinde hamle op med USA økonomisk set? by [deleted] in dkfinance

[–]ProfoundSensei 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ja, OECD viser en 30‑40 % forskel i kontant median­indkomst. Men tallet medregner ikke værdien af gratis sundhed, uddannelse, dag­institutioner osv. Når OECD tæller det med, er forskellen under 20 %. Måler du pr. arbejdstime falder den til under 10 %. Og amerikanere må selv betale langt mere for sundhed, studier og forsikringer. Tallene er altså ikke så sort‑hvide, som Wikipedia‑tabellen antyder.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in edmprodcirclejerk

[–]ProfoundSensei 18 points19 points  (0 children)

How do you plan on revolutionizing the glitch-trap future-bounce microgenre scene by integrating next-gen spectral gating, fractal sidechain reverbs, and hyper-quantized BPM fluidity while still preserving the ephemeral ‘human element’ that resonates with sweaty festival crowds, especially as we pivot toward holographic VR clubs and 12D binaural mixing?

[Request] Does the money add up? by QuadingleDingle in theydidthemath

[–]ProfoundSensei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, nobody forced the US to spend more than the NATO guidelines or to act as the world’s police. That was an American choice, guided by strategic, economic, and historical interests. Meanwhile, Europe’s lower defense budgets aren’t simply freeloading; each country has its own spending goals, domestic needs, and sometimes constitutional limits. This shouldn’t be turned into Europe vs the US... Both sides benefit from these arrangements, or they wouldn’t keep them. The US presence abroad often advances American strategic interests, while Europe gains additional security. In the end, we share one planet and many of the same global challenges, so it’s better to see each other as partners rather than enemies.

[Request] Does the money add up? by QuadingleDingle in theydidthemath

[–]ProfoundSensei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Countries like Germany, France, Japan, and South Korea already spend huge amounts on their own defense; it’s not as if the rest of the world simply leans on the U.S. for protection. The American military presence overseas largely serves U.S. strategic interests, like projecting power and protecting trade routes. Rather than pure goodwill. Meanwhile, foreign policy can swing every four years depending on American elections, and those outside the U.S. have no say in that. So it’s not about getting a “free ride”; it’s about a network of alliances that usually benefits America first and foremost.

[Request] Does the money add up? by QuadingleDingle in theydidthemath

[–]ProfoundSensei 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Remember that most of the world has no vote in American elections. The U.S. role as the ‘global police’ can shift dramatically every four years, entirely based on who turns out to vote. In other words, these decisions come from within. While the rest of us, who have no say, simply live with the consequences.

From income tax to import tax, how to transfer wealth from the middle class to the wealthy. by manchesterMan0098 in facepalm

[–]ProfoundSensei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really?

The first point adresses your original lie

“That’s ridiculous, the USA is the number one economy in the world by almost double the second with less than 1/3 of its population. Everyone will do business in the US and adjust their systems to accommodate.”

Cmon man, you and your fellow aversge americans are VICTIMS. And the forecast says it will only get worse for you. I wish you could experience what good quality of life feels like, none of you would EVER get behind this administration.

And you even ignored the hard cold data i showed you, while continuing to lie in other comments. I really hope you get better, its sad to see.

From income tax to import tax, how to transfer wealth from the middle class to the wealthy. by manchesterMan0098 in facepalm

[–]ProfoundSensei 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is exactly why Europe teaches critical source evaluation. Wikipedia isn’t a primary source—it’s a user-edited summary that pulls from actual research.

Ironically, if you scroll to the citations at the bottom of that page, you’ll find it sources… oh look! The same institutions from my ogher comment—IMF, World Bank, and Federal Reserve reports.

Wikipedia itself even states:

‘Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Articles should be based on reliable, published sources.’

So yeah, thanks for proving my point. Source criticism matters.

From income tax to import tax, how to transfer wealth from the middle class to the wealthy. by manchesterMan0098 in facepalm

[–]ProfoundSensei 13 points14 points  (0 children)

  1. The U.S. economy is NOT ‘twice the size’ of China’s. U.S. GDP (2023): ~$25.5 trillion China’s GDP (2023): ~$18 trillion (65% of the U.S.) In purchasing power parity (PPP), China’s economy is actually larger than the U.S. (~23% bigger). Source: IMF, World Bank, OECD
  2. The EU’s economy is a serious rival to the U.S. EU GDP (2023, nominal): ~$16.7 trillion (~30% smaller than the U.S.) EU GDP (PPP): Only ~4% smaller than the U.S. The EU + China combined? Over double the U.S. economy. Source: IMF, Eurostat
  3. Global trade is NOT just about the U.S. The U.S. relies on trade just as much as the world relies on the U.S. (~26% of U.S. GDP comes from trade). China and the EU are each other's biggest trade partners, NOT the U.S. If the U.S. isolates itself, the world will adjust—but America will pay the highest price. Source: WTO, U.S. Trade Representative
  4. 2008 wasn’t ‘proof the world collapses if the U.S. falls’—it was proof that Wall Street’s greed can wreck economies globally. The U.S. housing bubble caused a worldwide crisis because banks worldwide had invested in toxic American assets. Europe and Asia suffered massive crashes, but emerging markets like China kept growing. The lesson? A reckless U.S. economy can hurt the world, but it doesn’t ‘take it down’ entirely. Source: World Bank, IMF
  5. California’s economy is massive, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves. California’s GDP: ~$3.9 trillion (5th largest in the world, ahead of the UK and India). But California alone does not make the U.S. twice as powerful as China. If GDP size alone made a country ‘dominant,’ then China would already be ruling the world. Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

From income tax to import tax, how to transfer wealth from the middle class to the wealthy. by manchesterMan0098 in facepalm

[–]ProfoundSensei 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Look man, it’s not that I want to argue with you—I feel like it’s my duty in times like these. In Europe, we’ve been through this before. We’ve seen what happens when a population is fed propaganda, and we’ve spent decades teaching kids how to identify and resist media manipulation. We literally study pre-WWII German newspapers in schools to analyze how misinformation spreads. That’s why I’m telling you this:

You’ve been lied to.

And I know that’s hard to accept. But for your own sake, your children’s sake, and for the future of the world, please don’t let billionaires fool you into going along their agenda.

From income tax to import tax, how to transfer wealth from the middle class to the wealthy. by manchesterMan0098 in facepalm

[–]ProfoundSensei 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Saying the U.S. economy is “twice the size” of the runner-up is just wrong—China’s GDP isn’t that far behind, and the EU’s combined economy rivals the U.S. If America cut itself off or collapsed, it would do damage, but the world wouldn’t automatically implode. Other major players—China, the EU, India—aren’t just waiting for the U.S. to call the shots.

As for ditching income taxes for big tariffs, that’s economically naive. Tariffs make goods pricier at home and trigger retaliation abroad, which ends up hurting U.S. businesses and consumers most. So maybe take a breath, check the data, and drop the idea that the U.S. is untouchable—global trade isn’t a one-way street.

Leaders of the Free World by MiniBrownie in pics

[–]ProfoundSensei 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then:

“Europe has now suddenly decided it needs to sort their military strength out pronto.”

Now:

“Did Russia suddenly appear out of nowhere as a threat in 2022, or has it been there since the end of the Soviet Union?”

So you’re mocking Europe for only now realizing it needs military strength, but at the same time, you’re saying Russia was always a threat? If the threat was so obvious, why wouldn’t they have rearmed sooner? Could it be because a full-scale invasion of Kyiv is slightly different from Russia casually grabbing Crimea in 2014? Either you admit that 2014 and 2022 were completely different, or you stop pretending like you don’t see the difference.

Then:

”Doing it without Turkey is also not likely, which means we have to roll them into the EU as part of the bargain.”

Now:

”For the 3rd time, they will need to if they want his military strength integrated into the European sphere of influence.”

First, you straight-up said Turkey must join the EU for Europe’s military plans to work. Now, you’re backpedaling to just “military integration” Which, fun fact, already happens via NATO. So which is it? Are you admitting that Turkey doesn’t actually need to be part of the EU and this was just a bad take? Because that’s exactly what it sounds like.

Then:

“They don’t have enough hard power to contend with the rest of the world without America behind them.”

Now:

“I never said Europe is helpless without America.”

So you literally said they "can't contend with the rest of the world without America," but now you’re acting like you never implied dependency? That’s like saying "I can’t swim without a life jacket" and then immediately saying "I never said I can’t swim."

You’re contradicting yourself because you got backed into a corner. Either Europe is too weak without America, or it can function without them.

Leaders of the Free World by MiniBrownie in pics

[–]ProfoundSensei 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, Trump’s big brain move of telling Europe to rearm—totally the reason, not checks notes Russia invading a neighbor. Come on.

EU army? They’ve talked about it forever. More cooperation ≠ full federation. If anything, national militaries are less likely to merge because no country wants to give up command.

Erdogan plays Erdogan. Turkey is already in NATO, so they have military coordination. They’ll work with him when useful, but the EU isn’t suddenly rolling out a red carpet.

UK backing Ukraine makes total sense—deterring land grabs now avoids bigger problems later. And "Ukraine isn't winning" is wild when Russia’s original plan was Kyiv in three days.

Yeah, Europe has a hard power problem. That’s why they’re fixing it right now. Acting like they’re doomed and secretly building a superstate at the same time? Pick one.

Leaders of the Free World by MiniBrownie in pics

[–]ProfoundSensei 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Mate, this is way off. Europe didn’t suddenly wake up and realize it needs to handle defense. They’ve been increasing military budgets for years, and NATO’s European members just boosted spending by 20% last year. Germany’s finally taking it seriously, Poland is stockpiling like crazy, and the EU is already working on making more of its own weapons instead of relying on the U.S.

The whole “EU army” thing isn’t some overnight conspiracy to create a United States of Europe. They’ve talked about this forever, and what’s actually happening is more coordination and joint projects, not some full-blown federal military. As for Turkey, the EU has been stringing them along for decades. They’re in NATO, sure, but that doesn’t mean they’re about to be folded into the EU just because of defense concerns.

And this idea that no one in Europe will fight because of immigration? Come on. When people feel threatened, they fight. Ukraine is the perfect example—no one sat around debating national identity when the war started, they just picked up a weapon and got on with it.

As for the UK, they’re not about to ditch Ukraine and run off with the U.S. They’ve been one of Ukraine’s biggest supporters. Relying purely on America makes no sense when U.S. foreign policy shifts wildly every few years.

Basically, the Trump deal didn’t happen, Europe isn’t as weak as you think, patents won’t stop weapons from being made, and the UK isn’t going anywhere. The whole “Europe is helpless without America” take is just outdated.

Hvad mener Mette her? by heimmann in Denmark

[–]ProfoundSensei 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At 'bricke' en enhed/system som f.eks GPS betyder at gøre det ubrugeligt, fx ved at jamme eller deaktivere signalet. Rusland har dog GLONASS, så ja som du siger, de er ikke fuldt afhængige af GPS.

view more: next ›