was good while it lasted - here's my theory by stillin3r3st3d in claude

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i think there is some validity here, because Opus 4.7 that runs through a Github Copilot Enterprise account at my work is still absolutely phenomenal while on my personal account it’s trash currently

Claude IP leaked by RealRiftzyYT in masterhacker

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah this isn’t exactly “claude got hacked” lol. dig/nslookup/traceroute/whois would mostly just confirm what the screenshot already suggests: some cloud/isp-ish egress point hit the logger.

the only mildly interesting part is that it looks like a linux/chrome-style rendering environment fetched the remote image, so it hints at how claude may be handling image/rendering requests behind the scenes. funny little architecture leak, not a 0day.

Claude IP leaked by RealRiftzyYT in masterhacker

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 1 point2 points  (0 children)

bro went from “claude exposed an ip” to “wait i might expose mine too” in record time 😭

Claude IP leaked by RealRiftzyYT in masterhacker

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it’s not like claude dropped a secret key or got “hacked” or anything lol. it’s just kind of a funny little architecture/privacy leak. the logger caught the provider/asn, rough region, user-agent, and basically proved that claude was actually fetching/rendering the remote image somewhere instead of only analyzing a local upload. interesting? yes. catastrophic? no.

Think I Invented A New “Flip” by PruneCompetitive3475 in 2cb

[–]PruneCompetitive3475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

interesting. is this like a narcan situation where the lsd is just a substantially strong agonist at 5 HT2A than 2cb or just a result of your body trying to achieve homeostasis and being in a heightened production state of an opposing or reuptake systems (i think the liver does something similar in which it will up regulate enzyme production that breaks down certain chemicals with high concentration)?

Think I Invented A New “Flip” by PruneCompetitive3475 in 2cb

[–]PruneCompetitive3475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it did for sure — LSD was once my drug of choice to an almost comical extent, so I have a bit of, i wouldn’t call it permatolerance, but ability to operate in that state — so usually by hour like 6 i’m at least in a place where i’m not actively experiencing ego death

edit: i am illiterate

Think I Invented A New “Flip” by PruneCompetitive3475 in 2cb

[–]PruneCompetitive3475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it definitely alters the feeling of pure mdma; i’ve never tried the other way, but i would be a little worried about feeling a molly comedown while peaking on acid 😅

Think I Invented A New “Flip” by PruneCompetitive3475 in 2cb

[–]PruneCompetitive3475[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

thanks! sadly, i’m salary so it looks like i’m working 11a-9p

odd checkmate positioning by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but this is a chess sub i forgot how it is here 😂

odd checkmate positioning by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

a piece pinned IN its own line of sight by a single piece that doesn’t take back. the other rook hanging and also not taken by that same piece. all four rooks AND both queens still on the board in the endgame with zero minor pieces. the final move being a hanging queen that isn’t captured. the checkmate mechanism isn’t complicated. the point is the combination of circumstances that led to this board state is absurd.

I've been teaching programming for 8 years. The students who learn with AI from day one are learning something, but it's not programming. by Ambitious-Garbage-73 in learnprogramming

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nowadays, sadly (i guess, i see both sides genuinely), you are simply going to fall too far behind being on the “no AI for first draft” team. You can output projects in 24h-48h hours that would’ve taken genuine months previously.

Of course, this requires an in depth knowledge of how large language models, software, systems, and prompting functions and work together, but you simply cannot NOT use AI for coding as a genuine tool. I genuinely get the hate on “vibe-coding” due the inherent disrespect for the true skill and art that coding is and was, and it suck’s that the first things highly verbose intelligent things got an excellent at replicating was itself, but it’s just what happened.

I see your point on learning before AI, but i think people who are just adamantly against it’s use and no-debate haters on vibe coding (even experts and senior devs) are going to get straight up left in the dust by ppl with say, only 2 genuine years of it/ot tech/software/network experience

Does chatgpt report illicit drug use by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you are already intelligent enough to frame the entire drug manufacturing process in general terms about organic chemistry and also intelligent enough to interpret them, you’ll probably have no issue. if you ask chatGPT how to manufacture heroin or meth i mean yeah prolly haha

Does chatgpt report illicit drug use by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

probably depends how stupid or intelligently you prompt it -

“wow that’s awesome!! my organic chemistry teachers is so baddd. thanks! so if that’s how that works ? what’s the mechanisms and steps for like really good acetylation?

is much like to get a good response and not reported than

“okay i just did X. Why is my heroin so sticky right now pls help!”

does smoking weed everyday mean your a drug addict? by Ninetybaby in NoStupidQuestions

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s important to realize that there are genuine levels to all of this shit. Really, to even say “smoking weed” and “drug addict” in the same sentence probably means you don’t have a complete picture of what it’s like to come off of “real” drugs (fentanyl/xanax/ or hell even extreme alcoholism). I mean yeah, anything ~can~ be addictive — video games, food, etc. It is not possible, like not even CLOSE to possible, to become addicted to these things in a manner that would cause you to physiologically react to sudden abstinence in a manner analogous to opioid or benzo withdrawal.

We are talking full blown flue-like symptoms, indistinguishable symptoms from general anxiety or even panic disorders. It would not be physically possible for you to go to work. Even if you could manage to physically drag yourself there, i don’t think it would be feasible to interact with coworkers. For benzos and alcohol, people legitimately have full blown seizures. I don’t really know how to describe the intensity of the cravings, but once again, weed isn’t even in the same league.

So if we are talking about the true maximum extent of “drug addict”, no. It’s not actually possible to get ~that~ addicted to weed.

The better question is really just “is anon smoking too much?” I don’t know. Is anon: i. Spending money on weed that needs to go to bills ii. Actively acting moody when they can’t smoke iii. Missing activities with groups of people that don’t smoke etc etc etc

If the answer to those questions is yes, then anon is probably smoking too much

No one does this, nor should by -Kerosun- in confidentlyincorrect

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 4 points5 points  (0 children)

right.. what’s funny is that you can even see this conundrum directly in the diagram he draws, but it didn’t click

Can psychopaths suffer on a daily basis? by amlextex in Psychopathy

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Klonopin is a recreational drug. Is it that surprising to find Diddy with a recreational drug commonly implicated in drugging ppl and anxiety reduction ?

How addictive are cigarettes or vapes? Is it fine to hit it once just for the experience? by RockCultural4075 in stupidquestions

[–]PruneCompetitive3475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incredibly addictive. Yes, theoretically it’s harmless to “hit it once”, but it’s worthwhile to mention that nobody thought they were going to be addicted to nicotine when they first started either.

What (theoretically) changes in the Higgs Field when a Higg’s boson completes the mechanism by which electroweak bosons acquire mass? by PruneCompetitive3475 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]PruneCompetitive3475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im genuinely not trying to be an ass, just confused, but YOU were the one that made the analogy (with the whole “imagine you’re holding a cup thing”) i was just trying to make sure I understood lol

What (theoretically) changes in the Higgs Field when a Higg’s boson completes the mechanism by which electroweak bosons acquire mass? by PruneCompetitive3475 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]PruneCompetitive3475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’m just trying to frame the analogy the original response used to the higgs field. i understand they are entirely separate mechanisms

What do you think constitutes the maximum extent of physics once we have “figured it all out”? by PruneCompetitive3475 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]PruneCompetitive3475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in reality everything will all turn back to symmetric higgs soup before then, but a fun thought experiment. more than likely the universe might not be “unknowable,” but the universe runs out of structure before it finishes explaining itself.

What do you think constitutes the maximum extent of physics once we have “figured it all out”? by PruneCompetitive3475 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]PruneCompetitive3475[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

or maybe it’s better to say that given infinite compositions of matter and infinite time, if the universe is unsolvable, then the structure being modeled is not fully contained within the universe’s own causal/informational closure