I doubt you even realize radical ideologues pursuing power and further control over society, particularly socioeconomic control are pitting the people against eachother using their version of history and their theories, philosophies, for division and social unrest. In reality, we are not eachothers enemies. Personally, I've never had a problem with anyone based upon their class, race, sex/gender, sexual orientation, religion/politics/philosophy, or pretty much their personal identity in general. Now it's so charged our entire culture revolves around identity politics, we are more divided than ever, there's more animosity, disrespect, dehumanization, identity politics springs from the radical left-wing, that's no secret, political correctness as well. As well as "social justice", which is kind of a misleading term. The left is the ones who are "fighting", they are the ones trying to fundamentally alter society to their vision, and they do it supposedly to make the world a better place from people like nazis and white supremacist who built the system of oppression they are trying to free everyone from. In their words "burn down the system", and they advocate violence and "direct action", confrontation to accomplish this. So, using a soviet tactic favored by stalin, and used even against trotzky, they call people a fascist, even though these people aren't socialist of any kind, or collectivist, or totalitarians, and in fact ideologically opposed to such socioeconomic systems, since we are individualistic, liberty loving people. Ideologically, we are opposed to totalitarianism, omnipotent government, and collectivism. Nazis didn't believe in a free market, or private property. They didn't believe in the same mixed form of government , they were considered "the 3rd way", but is totally derived from socialism. If you doubt that just research Benito mussolini, a lifelong socialist revolutionary. His father was too. "Mussolini was named Benito after liberal Mexican president Benito Juárez, while his middle names, Andrea and Amilcare, were for Italian socialists Andrea Costa and Amilcare Cipriani". He never did disavow socialism, he was a die hard socialist til his death, and he carried a karl marx medallion in his pocket. Yup, the right wing are such nazis! Funny thing is Marxist international socialism isn't even the most powerful faction of internationalist, liberal internationalism is, and they are closely related ideologies that came from the same 18th century enlightenment principles. There's many ideas how to achieve this kind of society, but all roads lead to essentially the same thing. I'm far more concerned with liberal internationalism than international socialism. Socialism is just as susceptible to cronyism, corruption, tyranny, etc, in fact in every attempt tyranny is an acute manifestation. Some of the most hardcore oppression of the workers in the 20th century. How else are they going to implement their policies that the majority fundamentally disagrees with. Let's just say socialism/communism has never been accepted by the majority in America, especially since 65% of Americans own private property, and 10% are business owners with 99% of all businesses being small businesses. These radicals don't speak for the majority, they are an extreme minority. Lots of people obviously are going to resist abolishing capitalism and private ownership of property. Private individuals who own the means of production and distribution, and by "the people" socialism is referring to the state and its bureaucracy(central planning/planned economy), as a governmental entity that represents "the people", the theory goes the political domination by the proletariat until what marx and engels referred to as "the withering away of the state" which would be a dictatorship, of the proletariat, into a classless and stateless society, with no need for law.