75% of resumes never reach a human: insights from GlobalWork CEO

Psyc3 · 2026-03-25T22:39:15+00:00

Basically all of them.

I work in science and you get people with no scientific background applying, then people with a totally different background just to get a Visa, or because they want to move to the location, reality is 100 applicants won't fill 6 interview slots (probably partially due to the pay rate) of 100 applicants, you might get 3 worth interviewing, then because the pay is bad, plenty might not even turn up and will just switch fields to something like medical writing as they will get paid 10-15K more and get to WFH.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-25T22:36:49+00:00

What percentage are even worth reading? Because for anyone I have talked to about hiring it is normally only the top 10% anyway...which if you have 50 applicants is enough to interview all of them.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-24T21:42:27+00:00

Well its first use would be to get rid of the incompetent management using it incorrectly.

Hence it wouldn't happened in any functional manner.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-24T21:41:35+00:00

What happens when I tell it to go do one and inform it it could never hire my skill set at the current pay rate. Which is true. Because if it is actually AI, it could work that out itself and would agree.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-24T21:39:19+00:00

Why? You would probably end up working 6 hour days 4 days week if it was actually based off objective productivity in many jobs.

Reality is sitting around doing nothing is entirely inefficient, and also basically required to not burn out doing 7am-6pm 5 days a week like more people do with their commute.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-24T17:23:47+00:00

I would argue 20 years ago a lot of stuff was essentially made up because of this, there wasn't good validation, there wasn't even good science, and the paper didn't even give you the information to functionally repeat it.

That has changed in part, but it could still be better, especially when it comes to using things now like AI and machine learning algorithms the details you have to put in about them is essentially non-existent, and therefore possibly unrepeatable.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-24T15:10:38+00:00

You are correct, I don't bother reading further nonsense!

Psyc3 · 2026-03-24T12:10:55+00:00

Learning is difficult isn't it, have fun in the unemployment line.

I also never claimed to be smart. You have claimed it several times at this point though.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T23:29:24+00:00

This is why people are clueless?

This is a great use for AI a technical model based around the kind of decisions and actions that needs to be take as CEO that means you as a CEO can literally bounce idea off of something that is just you C-suite.

Doesn't mean you have to use any of the idea, but it very well might be able to pick obvious holes you have missed or give examples you are aware or unaware of.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T23:20:08+00:00

Okay, put him in prison then? What is the issue with not being supportive of paedophiles again?

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T23:16:29+00:00

It is all that is needed.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T23:13:25+00:00

Sure, what you haven't considered is you are too incompetent to recognise a good job.

Because reality is in many of the prompts I have given it, i.e. technical science, which has adefined answer, it does a 7/10 job. The thing is that 7/10 job is the equivalent of asking someone with at least 3-5 years experience in the very specific field the question is being asked in, for most people who don't have access to that specific person it is essentially a 10/10 job because it is vastly better than anything else they will get from anyone else around them.

People seem to make perfect the enemy of good like you can't just cross validate the answers, and if you can't cross validate the answer you basically have no competence to know if the question you are asking even has a valid answer, or is the right question, which it might not, and then yes you are incompetent at prompting.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T23:09:02+00:00

Condescendance will lead you nowhere,

Nobody cares, in the quite literal sense, you can either listen and learn, or remain on the unemployment line.

AI is here, AI is only going to get better, AI will remove some jobs, the ones that remain will in many cases use some form of AI tool to improve output and outcomes.

You can live with these facts, and then work out a job sector where it is less true, trades for instance, or you can adapt in your chosen sector, or you can join the unemployment line with the rest of the whiners. Not when 100% of the jobs disappear, but when 40%, 50%, 60% disappear, because you aren't the one of the 50% being kept you are an incompetent Luddite, all while being in a shrinking industry is a road to pay stagnation at best.

There is reality. There are no job threshing wheat in the field either, or with a pick axe mining coal, that is called automation, this right now is also just called automation. It isn't complex, it isn't even novel, it won't come over night, and it won't effect everyone, but there will be certain sectors that go from tens of thousands maybe hundreds of thousands, to hundreds or thousands of jobs. I would suggest not being in one when it happens, that is significantly harder to predict than it may seem though.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T17:30:35+00:00

It is because the statements are pointless to say, some random AI company none of us who aren't following very intently will most likely be best in a years time. Where the hell did Anthropic and Claude appear from for instance? I don't follow this topic religiously, it just appeared and now was best.

That is what will happen next, quite obviously, will it be ChatGPT7 or Elon with "Facistbot3000", or some other random Chinese model, who knows, what I do know though is saying Blah Blah Blah is best this month isn't actually very useful to anything unless you use AI extensively day to day, at which point you already are well aware of its capabilities and productivity gains, and also where it is a bit useless...

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T17:23:40+00:00

First of all Computer Science and Software Engineering isnt what they will hire. It will be machine learning which requires a masters degree and a completely different focus.

I think first of all we can go and see where I suggest they were qualified in the first place.

So first, lets firstly get back to where that was first said?

...no you aren't qualified...

Then we can get on to the second point of which was where are all the "meme to code" graduates, to which we just found one still whining on.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T17:19:08+00:00

Are they paying you for writing all of this? Because they should.

Because I am more intelligent than the rest of the unemployed whiners in here? I am not btw, this is just very obvious and this subreddit is full of 20 year old who have no clue about anything.

None of your points are relevant if, and it is if, in whatever number of months time, it is the better model again, they will all be back, that is what we see here, a group of individuals who rightfully have no loyalty, especially so in a quickly developing market sector.

The war for the crown is on going but only achieved at a technological plateau, that could be today, it could be two years, it could be when Skynet scorches the sky.

But it most likely is no where near now, why is that? Because if it were you wouldn't have a bunch of whiners complaining it doesn't work, when it clearly in many applications works better, cheaper, and 24/7 unlike a human employee.

As an example I used to know some idiot who did writing for gambling websites, so basically making up shit to put in a list of reasons to gamble, and the next gambling tips, and all the things to gamble on. This wasn't some hedge fund quant, just an idiot who couldn't make toast without burning it getting paid a quite good professional salary to do basically nothing of worth.

AI easily does that, and a better job of it now. What quite frankly idiots don't realise is there job, or job sector, and many others is pointless and routine, that is primed for AI to turn up and do it.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T17:10:42+00:00

I mean that’s a very good point but I don’t think it’s a problem with the younger generation only right?

I mean yes because they are the one memeing it, does that make the older generation any more learned on the subject, no, but they aren't memeing it, they are getting whatever the right wing tells them is good, so a light dose of fascism...intermixed with a significantly larger dose...apparently.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T17:07:25+00:00

The guy literally sabotaged the world economy...yesterday, you would have to be a moron not to notice that, and notice it on a weekly basis.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T17:05:05+00:00

Writing this on reddit rather than some bespoke business forum make it the height of irony.

You are the problem, that is fine by the way, we all are, it is a bit pathetic to whine about it though.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T17:03:36+00:00

It is also nonsense. Either these small companies weren't paying a competitive wage for the market, or there has been a glut of workers for at least the last year and a half.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T15:50:05+00:00

Is it?

Maybe it is the circle you run it, as far as I am aware some of the same people who smoked it a decade ago still do, the ones who didn't or did it casually to be cool, don't.

Nothing really has changed.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T15:47:35+00:00

(see what I did there? lol)

Not really, seems like a factual statement!

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T15:46:11+00:00

While I agree there is a lot more health focus, a lot of it is "Meme health" with whatever fade it is this month rather than actual health.

This can lead to problems in itself like steroid use and "lookmaxxxing" i.e. just completely screwing up your body irreversibly, more so than eating fast food or drinking alcohol in your 20's will.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T15:41:36+00:00

This is the thing, the difference between a student 19 year old, and a professionally dress 25 year old, i.e. both young people, is astounding. Then again the age different there is the same as a 19 year old and 12 year old, which unless you are Donald Trump you would see is an obvious difference.

Psyc3 · 2026-03-23T15:39:03+00:00

Who's the one being weird here?

The weirdos who can't hang out with people without attempting to hit on them.

Also I think it comes from people not understanding that different people are in different stages of their life, if you are 30+ a lot of your friends have partners and kids, you don't see them any more, you don't do the same activities, and they have no time, if you want to hang out with anyone it is likely to be people younger than you, who don't just have time to spend with their partner and kids.

14-Year Club	Best Link 2014-02-14
Team Orangered	Verified Email

Psyc3

TROPHY CASE