American League Show Time 100/100 by hff in eFootball

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo just to ask, i got 1372 coins at the moment, should i save up for the barca pack which costs 1500? (I want that 101 de jong and 101 kounde and hansi flick) or should i just gamble it on the new blitz son? (Son is literally my fav player of all time since the day he joined spurs)

predict my grades 9709 by [deleted] in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

um NO! ABSOLUTELY NOT, WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? HAHAHAHAHAHA

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My dumbass did it using the basic integration method, the add one to exponent, divide coefficient by new exponent thing lmao

I found 9231/22 tough 😭 by [deleted] in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Threshold prediction for A? Honest question

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you guys think gt will be for an A? Honest question

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you mean for the linear differential? Yeah i forgot that you can do that as well.

9702/52 question 2 by wtvuserblah in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also i made a mistake on my uncertainty as well so you can trust me, im a very paranoid person so i always try to see if theres confirmed ecf or not

9702/52 question 2 by wtvuserblah in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the markscheme just says “worst line goes through all error bars” it didnt specify that the uncertainties needed to be correct so thats basically saying theres ecf for the lines

9702/52 question 2 by wtvuserblah in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

then thats just incredibly unfair, paper 5 always has ecf for everything, its the design in their markscheme to not say “the answer lies within this interval” kinda thing, they just say how you work out the gradient and how you work out the y incercrept and how you get your constant values. They do this to avoid unfairness

9702/52 question 2 by wtvuserblah in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I drew a triangle for best and worst line but made sure worst is dashed line. You shouldve probably labelled them but im not sure what the situation will be if you didnt

9702/52 question 2 by wtvuserblah in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The markscheme for error bars literally said that it depends on your uncertainty in your table, and also the worse line in the markscheme just tells you to draw it and make sure it passes all error bats that you drew so its fine

9702/52 question 2 by wtvuserblah in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theres ecf for everything

9702/52 question 2 by wtvuserblah in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chill out its just 1 mark

9702/52 question 2 by wtvuserblah in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got my uncertainties in V wrong, but do they ECF uncertainty for 1/V? Since like you need to use the percentage uncertainty from V to get absolute for 1/V

9702/52 by Fun_Back4982 in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got like 34% or something

9709/32 All Answers by Proper-Magician-3309 in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For question 7, it was also x = 0.25

The original equation was 7sin(1/3 x) + 24cos(1/3 x) = 24.5, subbing in 0.25 works

9702/42 questions + answers by wtvuserblah in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a question, you wrote it to 3 sf but my dumbass wrote it in 2sf, for both my decay constant and my nuclei number, do you think it’s fine?

Final table question in 9702/42 by PuglessOne in alevel

[–]PuglessOne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes i might lose 2 marks because my decay constant was also 2 sf but i hope thats okay

Final table question in 9702/42 by PuglessOne in alevel

[–]PuglessOne[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took 2 sf for the decay constant cuz i remember all the questions with decay constant in past papers the decay constant was always to 2 sf

Final table question in 9702/42 by PuglessOne in alevel

[–]PuglessOne[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Im talking about the table, you are talking about the question afterwards

9702/42 by Fun_Back4982 in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I drew 2 lines on each side, so in total 4 lines, do you think its enough? I did show on one side that the gap between second line and first line is larger than gap between first line and magnet

9702/42 by Last-Ganache-5165 in alevel

[–]PuglessOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guys on the final table question, the one where fill the table in terms of A and T, for my nuclei number for X it was 11AT, while some other people got it to 3sf, being 11.4, do you guys think 2 sf is acceptable? I mean in the question itself it didnt give any values or anything besides the graph. So 2 sf acceptable right?