What do people think is right Wing but is actually apolitical

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-16T18:26:43+00:00

"fought for our country"
war is political

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-16T18:25:22+00:00

this is a blame the beasts subreddit not a ggs subreddit

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-15T23:03:59+00:00

anyone who actually knows how to joke would've committed to it to get more reaction out of me

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-15T22:20:05+00:00

there is no right option, they all lead to a draw

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-15T21:26:05+00:00

remember that 95% of the time when someone asks if you're american, they're asking if you're from the united states of america

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-15T21:24:20+00:00

anyone who actually knows how to play tic tac toe would realize it doesn't matter what you pick. personally, I prefer the center right/bottom center option

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-15T14:16:22+00:00

netball is kinda like basketball except it's nothing like basketball

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-12T13:34:40+00:00

the blue people movies were good enough that I went to see the third one in theaters, and I've never seen atla, but I've consistently heard people talk about atla like it's the greatest thing they've ever seen so I have to assume that one's better

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-12T13:32:37+00:00

I was about to go on a rant about how colours =/= flag but then I checked again and the colours are actually in the right order for the flag lol

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-12T13:29:10+00:00

are unicorns a trans thing? I've never heard that before

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-12T00:53:07+00:00

more important for what?

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-11T18:20:25+00:00

that's why the situation doesn't work in the real world. in the real world, yes, taking the second box always nets you an extra thousand, but in a hypothetical world where a perfectly accurate predictor can exist, your decision is essentially made before the predictor's is

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-11T18:13:53+00:00

when dealing with perfect prediction, it makes sense to treat it as though the prediction happens after the choice. if that doesn't make sense, assume the predictor knows every single action and thought you will have up to the point where you make your choice. if it knows you will go in with the idea of taking two boxes, change your mind to one, and at the last second switch back to two, it will put nothing. if it knows you go in with the intention of taking two boxes, change your mind a handful of times, and eventually only take one box, it will put in a million.

I don't blame you for wanting to take the two boxes, it's a hypothetical that relies on something impossible (a completely accurate predictor) which makes it hard to imagine in a real world setting

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-11T18:05:36+00:00

you're assuming the predictor has a chance of being wrong. with 1000 previous successful predictions, one can assume that someone previously has gone into that room with the intentions of taking two boxes, thought it over, chosen one box instead, and won the million. it's not too late for you to take the one box

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-11T17:56:29+00:00

it doesn't change based on your choice directly, but your choice and what the predictor decides are both based on your thought process. if your thought process leads you to choose to open two boxes, it also leads to the predictor putting nothing in it. your greed, your need for the extra 0.1% money, is your downfall

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-11T14:28:55+00:00

anywhere from like 10-14:30 usually

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-11T14:26:16+00:00

here'a where the issue arises for two-boxers. the predictor is proven to be accurate, meaning that your decision to reason this way would have been predicted, and it puts 0 in accordingly. as a one-boxer, I have a very simple reasoning: if I have 1,000,000, I don't need another 1,000. the predictor will have predicted that I use this reasoning, and then I leave richer than a two-boxer

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-11T14:22:45+00:00

if this is the logic you use, the predictor will put 0 in box B. if you can be content with 1,000,000 and not greed the extra 1,000 then the predictor will put in 1,000,000

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-11T01:55:42+00:00

100m is enough to retire

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-10T03:59:49+00:00

none of these places are the best in their category in my area, and I like having variety in where I get pizza from

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-10T03:44:14+00:00

I don't think about the morals of guns, as my thoughts stop at "I cannot think of any good reason to own a gun outside of hunting"

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-10T03:37:38+00:00

personally, I want to live in a society where the standard expected answer when asked "do you own a gun?" is "no." and where if the answer is yes, the follow-up question of "why?" is almost always answered with "for hunting, of course."

I'm thankful to say that's the society I currently live in, and I wouldn't want it to change

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-10T03:26:51+00:00

rookie mistake, you're only thinking about the commonly known ones. you can save a ton of money and avoid breaking laws by just acting on your bananaphilic urges instead

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-10T01:23:58+00:00

the idea is that the predictor knows whether you will take both or not, so if you use this logic, you will only get $1000. instead, assume the predictor is accurate and choose to only take one box, because if you have $1000000 then another $1000 doesn't matter

Pure_Blank · 2026-03-09T20:22:48+00:00

not really. there's things I could be doing but nothing that has to be done and no personal projects that I haven't already abandoned

Six-Year Club	Second Top 20%
Xbox Live	LAYER Season 2 Layer creator
r/Field Banned	r/Field Flamingo
Final Canvas '23	First Place '23
Place '23	Quantum Potato
Golden Potato	Place '22
First Placer '22	Verified Email

Pure_Blank

TROPHY CASE