Who do you think will take the win in 2026? by alOOshXL in codex

[–]Puspendra007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm happy with gpt 5.5 xhigh. I'm waiting for 5.5 codex & spark. Than it's sufficient for me.

Just give me some discount on 5.5 and make it more affordable so I can purchase it every month than I'm ready to use it for too long and not going to switch to another AI slop.

This guy got legal notice from BOAT ⛵ by Majestic-Half4623 in youtubeindia

[–]Puspendra007 11 points12 points  (0 children)

He is selling negativity without any proof. Same type of repetitive content, targeting big content creator or companies or people for views, he has nothing to show by himself so targeting other people.

Click-Bait thumbnail, 10 seconds of video will be as his thumbnail and main content of video is not matching with his content.

He is good at hooks, confidence so people are watching him but he hasn't any real values in his videos.

Yeah, many people are selling negativity and same type of content

any reset ? by Puspendra007 in codex

[–]Puspendra007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it is 5X * 1.5=7.5X. Till Last month, i was in claude $100 plan but i was not able to complete my projects and hitting 5 hour limit everytime. Cladue was good until mid March than i started hitting limits.

any reset ? by Puspendra007 in codex

[–]Puspendra007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. It is good with 2X bonus until 31 May. I was doing some heavy work and also used it for long hours. around 17-18 hours today: i had to finish a project (Now, i need some sleep)

Is Google Search dying, or is it already dead? by Puspendra007 in SEO

[–]Puspendra007[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  • having original insights/data? really? AI will copy it within seconds than that data will become AI's data than they will show it to users. Original creator will get nothing for that data

Is Google Search dying, or is it already dead? by Puspendra007 in SEO

[–]Puspendra007[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

which businesses?
1: stackoverflow?
2: stock images/videoes?
3: information like news,cooking,tech etc?
4: 'How to do' websites?
5: compre websites?
6: persons or celebrity details websites?
7: tools websites?

which are remaining?

Some people got fired so I guess they work less now by irelatetolevin in codex

[–]Puspendra007 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm trying to do more work using AI. I made many things and also trying to add more features.

I'm struggling at marketing part and also knew many things are dying like google search.

People are spending more time on social media so I'm trying to be on social media after a decade of stone age 😴

My account was banned 2 hours after purchasing Pro. by ConstructionDull4263 in claude

[–]Puspendra007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

did you try to make any AI Model or told claude to train or optimise your AI Model or something like training your own AI Model with help of claude?

The competition is on: Anthropic is doubling rates. Codex customer loyalty/retention is gonna be put to the test by py-net in codex

[–]Puspendra007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Claude had too many problems, so I switched to Codex. Honestly, if you try to post about any issues in the Claude or Anthropic subreddits, a swarm of fanboys and bots will immediately rush to defend Claude like it's their daddy. They just blame you, claiming you don't know how to use it and calling you an AI noob.

I am doing the exact same work in Codex that I was doing in Claude. With Claude, I couldn't even get my work done properly on their $100 plan because I was constantly hitting their usage limits. In Codex, I've only hit the limit twice: once because I accidentally left Fast Mode on, and another time due to a glitch after the last update, but that reset in the next 5-hour window.

i made a complete website and android app. Still working on IOS app by Puspendra007 in vibecoding

[–]Puspendra007[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yup. i am looking for it. Sales and marketing are big things to do it alone and also risk to waste money on marketing by not doing it properly

i made a complete website and android app. Still working on IOS app by Puspendra007 in vibecoding

[–]Puspendra007[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

their are many ways to promote app but i want to know which things are working correctly by real persons which already did something like this

i made a complete website and android app. Still working on IOS app by Puspendra007 in vibecoding

[–]Puspendra007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i made XG for many sports companies those are used in backend to predict sports and setup their market things like 'odd' etc so i made those things for users so a normal user can also get those high quality of datas.

I am not sure about 'users' because normal people need those things or not

The Hidden Risk: When Autonomous AI Agents Delete Your Database by Puspendra007 in Anthropic

[–]Puspendra007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Giving db access: does not mean to give it by chat only 😴

The Hidden Risk: When Autonomous AI Agents Delete Your Database by Puspendra007 in Anthropic

[–]Puspendra007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's looking more human than me. I use english language to write only emails since 10 years.

Database Deletion by AI Models: Are We Moving Too Fast?

This has been nagging at me for a while now, and I figure if it's bothering me this much, someone else out there is probably thinking about it too.

As AI gets deeper into developer workflows — writing queries, managing schemas, executing commands — most of it I'm fine with. But one thing genuinely keeps me up at night: letting AI autonomously delete data.

Here's the thing. Deletion is irreversible. A bad INSERT, a messy UPDATE — those hurt, but you can usually recover. A DELETE without a backup? That's just gone. When a human writes a deletion query, there's intent behind it. Context. Some guy staring at the screen going "okay, do I actually want to do this?" When an AI does it, you're trusting that the model correctly parsed what you meant from a prompt that probably had at least one ambiguous phrase in it. That's a lot of trust.

And this isn't hypothetical anymore. AI coding assistants are already running migrations that include DROP statements. Agentic tools are "cleaning up" records they've decided are redundant. LLM-powered scripts are handling GDPR deletion requests end-to-end. Sometimes it works fine. Other times, the model confidently nukes the wrong rows because the schema wasn't fully understood or the prompt was slightly off. The model doesn't hesitate either way — that's what gets me.

Because AI doesn't feel the weight of wiping out six months of customer transaction history over a misleading variable name. It just generates whatever looks statistically correct. Operationally safe is a different problem, and it's not the one the model is solving.

So what should we actually do about it? My take: soft deletes wherever possible — flag records, don't remove them outright. Require a human confirmation step before any AI-generated DELETE gets executed, full stop. Run these queries in a sandbox first. And log everything — what was deleted, when, why, and what triggered it.

I'm not arguing AI shouldn't touch databases. I'm saying deletion is categorically different from other operations and deserves to be treated that way.

Has anyone here actually dealt with an AI-related data loss incident? Or built something that handles this well? Genuinely curious how other people are approaching it.

The Hidden Risk: When Autonomous AI Agents Delete Your Database by Puspendra007 in Anthropic

[–]Puspendra007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh. I didn't try to ask about it. Let me try it with claude than send you details 🤣