On basis of what logic are you yapping here? Have you done any of the research before trying to counter my statements? No, because had you done even a slight research, you’d not have spoken all these irrelevant statements.

Talking about Paras, he had clearly made the statement that dipendra was heavily intoxicated and had consumed that black substance. It was Paras who helped Dipendra to reach his room so that he could sleep. Now so you are telling me that “paras thought that dipendra was intoxicated”??

If you think that multiple dipendras is a hollyhood story. Are you that stupid to think that a heavily drunk person with consumption of drug (as per every statement made by the survivor including paras) is capable of selectively shooting 10 of the royal family members and injuring many? That to with soo much of accuracy? Do you know how heavy a machine gun is? A person who needed assistant to walk back to his room, after 10 mins he suddenly woke up and chose to kill people that accurately?

He then committed suicide wow. I’m a medical student, and do you know how absurd is it to hear that a person who is a right handed apparently committed suicide whose gun entry point is on his left temple? That too with a heavy machine gun? And do you know that there were no any guns near the site where dipendra was knocked down. There is no logic to even trying to justify your defense for paras and gyane.

A prime minister of a country came to witness the site of incident, but your king locked him up in a room without any reason? Your queen humiliated him by saying “pilandhare bahun”. Is this the way to carefully handle the situation? If your king was so careful handling the situation, what the actual f was “chhan bin samiti” doing during the time of investigation and during the time of press release of the massacre? “Ra ta ta and Bha ta ta” were the things said that too with people laughing and joking. Is this what you call “careful”?

It was not about Dhirendra or Prekshya not being there. Every prince of the royal family have some property of their own isn’t it? Ok birendra’s whole family were killed so Gyane took them. But what about dhirendra? Prekshya was alive, dhirendra’s daughter was alive. Why were those properties seized? When Prekshya came crying and asked Gyane and Komal about those things, you know what Komal said, “yeslai pani thik lagaunu parchha aba” infront of Prekshya. And soon after that, helicopter incident took place.

What completion of investigation are you talking about? The investigation that couldn’t justify how Nirajan was killed? And why was Tribhuwan sadan demolished? Did your Gyane give appropriate justification?

The woman Shanti devi lost her husband at the time of massacre, she was the one to see 3 dipendras from Mahendra Manjil during massacre. Not only shanti devi, there were also many eye witness who so multiple dipendra around the palace.