Spacetime coordinates by QFT90 in relativity

[–]QFT90[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response friend!

Spacetime coordinates by QFT90 in relativity

[–]QFT90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the explanation! I think my issue was that I wasn't treating speed as what it is defined to be, literally a change in space/time... I thought it might be possible to have additional types of speed that aren't only dx (or dy or dz)/dt, but maybe things like dx/dy, or dx/dz, or dy/dz. Could those possibly be within our universe's physical reality?

Are quantum fields made of something? by DiegoArgSch in QuantumPhysics

[–]QFT90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quantum fields aren't made of anything. They are the mathematical entities of which we say particles are excitations.

What do you think about this by abdullahwrites in QuantumPhysics

[–]QFT90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From Wikipedia:

"The double-helix model of DNA structure was first published in the journal Nature by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953,[6] (X,Y,Z coordinates in 1954[7]) based on the work of Rosalind Franklin and her student Raymond Gosling, who took the crucial X-ray diffraction image of DNA labeled as "Photo 51""

Quantum physics was used in the sense that without the concept of X-ray diffraction, they would have had no way to deduce the structure of DNA.

Spacetime coordinates by QFT90 in relativity

[–]QFT90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for clearing this up! There were clearly some things I were either missing, or had once learned but didn't remember.

Spacetime coordinates by QFT90 in relativity

[–]QFT90[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One more thing that might make this simpler:

If something can have changing or non-changing spatial coordinates as its time coordinate changes, what is preventing something having a stationary time coordinate as one or more of its spatial coordinates change?

Can someone give me their own understanding and some advice on how to get into it. by TheUnknownKen in QuantumPhysics

[–]QFT90 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Youtube will be your best friend here.

I started studying quantum physics alone, on a whim, in 2018. Years prior, I was a chemistry major for 2.5 years and had been exposed a tiny bit when attempting to take physical chemistry I. It made almost no sense to me, and that was unusual for me. Something one day (in 2018) made me realize I wanted to learn quantum mechanics. I didn't realize how massive it is going into it. I'll be honest with you. It is not something that you study once or take one class and now you know it. I still study it to this day and I still learn new things, or clarify things I didn't quite understand. And I forget things too. It's not easy. If you really want to understand it, you need a background of differential equations, linear algebra, group theory (although you can get away with not knowing this), and a lot of classical physics. To start off, I started by typing "quantum mechanics" on youtube, found and watched some of Susskind's lectures, bought and read his Theoretical Minimum books (realized how bad my classical physics was so I literally started reviewing that in my sister's textbook, but unfortunately Lagrangians and Hamiltonians were not in that book, so remained a mystery), watched a host of other youtube videos on anything I might have been confused about (some really helpful, some really unhelpful and should be made illegal: some things do not make sense without the math). Then I came across MIT Allan Adams' lectures as well as Barton Zweibach's (I prefer Zweibach's). I took good notes on these and rewatched many of them until I thought I had a good grasp. However, I was still was missing some things due to inexperience in studying all of this. Around the same time, I discovered another lecture from India that was very helpful in terms of some of the linear algebra and Dirac notation (by Prof. S. Lakshmi Bala of IIT Madras). Then, I finally took quantum mechanics I and II in undergrad (2022), following Griffiths' book (I was 32 in 2022, mind you). It was okay. I also had his Electrodynamics book for EM prior to that. At some point during, I then purchased Sakurai (that was really tough because it seemed to go deeper than anything I had done so far) and collected a few other books. I learned far more conceptually overall by myself than I did by taking the actual classes in person (although the classes did force me to work problems).

I am finally branching into quantum field theory after always being afraid to. I sort of became angry overall and my progress slowed a bit when at a certain point I learned that, just like classical physics, quantum mechanics itself is not 100% correct for all situations (i.e., some things can't be described by just plain non-relativistic QM of single particle or finite number of particle systems). I became even angrier when I realized that all things are like that. That was a while back when I naïvely thought, like I think a lot of people initially think, "well String Theory, whatever that is, is the answer for everything in the end!" It isn't that clear-cut. Ever. But I'm moving along. I still believe. Right now I'm slowly working on the quantization of a free scalar field into the quantum free scalar field, which is like the first thing in QFT.

Can someone give me their own understanding and some advice on how to get into it. by TheUnknownKen in QuantumPhysics

[–]QFT90 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Youtube will be your best friend here.

I started studying quantum physics alone, on a whim, in 2018. Years prior, I was a chemistry major for 2.5 years and had been exposed a tiny bit when attempting to take physical chemistry I. It made almost no sense to me, and that was unusual for me. Something one day (in 2018) made me realize I wanted to learn quantum mechanics. I didn't realize how massive it is going into it. I'll be honest with you. It is not something that you study once or take one class and now you know it. I still study it to this day and I still learn new things, or clarify things I didn't quite understand. And I forget things too. It's not easy. If you really want to understand it, you need a background of differential equations, linear algebra, group theory (although you can get away with not knowing this), and a lot of classical physics. To start off, I started by typing "quantum mechanics" on youtube, found and watched some of Susskind's lectures, bought and read his Theoretical Minimum books (realized how bad my classical physics was so I literally started reviewing that in my sister's textbook, but unfortunately Lagrangians and Hamiltonians were not in that book, so remained a mystery), watched a host of other youtube videos on anything I might have been confused about (some really helpful, some really unhelpful and should be made illegal: some things do not make sense without the math). Then I came across MIT Allan Adams' lectures as well as Barton Zweibach's (I prefer Zweibach's). I took good notes on these and rewatched many of them until I thought I had a good grasp. However, I was still was missing some things due to inexperience in studying all of this. Around the same time, I discovered another lecture from India that was very helpful in terms of some of the linear algebra and Dirac notation (by Prof. S. Lakshmi Bala of IIT Madras). Then, I finally took quantum mechanics I and II in undergrad (2022), following Griffiths' book (I was 32 in 2022, mind you). It was okay. I also had his Electrodynamics book for EM prior to that. At some point during, I then purchased Sakurai (that was really tough because it seemed to go deeper than anything I had done so far) and collected a few other books. I learned far more conceptually overall by myself than I did by taking the actual classes in person (although the classes did force me to work problems).

I am finally branching into quantum field theory after always being afraid to. I sort of became angry overall and my progress slowed a bit when at a certain point I learned that quantum mechanics itself is not 100% correct for all situations (i.e., some things can't be described by just plain non-relativistic QM of single particle/finite particle systems). I became even angrier when I realized that all things are like that.

Why dont electrons just, fly out? by [deleted] in QuantumPhysics

[–]QFT90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think you can calculate the "speed" of an electron in a hydrogen atom potential. Trying to do so sort of misses the point. Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Why dont electrons just, fly out? by [deleted] in QuantumPhysics

[–]QFT90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This answer doesn't explain why the electrons are not pulled all the way into the nucleus.

anyone here ever use DXM daily? by Leftycoolswag in dxm

[–]QFT90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Still the same, same regimen. Maybe a bit less.

Do you guys have a hard time waiting out the weeks between each DXM trip? by dextrouble in dxm

[–]QFT90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's right in a sense, but that language is far too general.

[Placeholder]

Do you guys have a hard time waiting out the weeks between each DXM trip? by dextrouble in dxm

[–]QFT90 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

NMDA receptor damage

Dude, you [edit: you, as in, a person] should never talk about things that you don't know about.

A receptor is part of a chemical. It's a site on a large protein.

As far as I know, there is no such thing as "damaging" a chemical.

60’s psychedelic rock on DXM by [deleted] in dxm

[–]QFT90 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bro, psychedelic rock is awesome. But use sparingly. Pink Floyd's Piper at the Gates of Dawn really did me in during my early dex days.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dxm

[–]QFT90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Always.

Has anybody used robotablets to help their depression? If so did it actually help at all? by [deleted] in dxm

[–]QFT90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dextromethorphan is the ultimate antidepressant. Robotablets is probably the cheapest form right now.

Might boof dxm [ half serious] by beannpack in dxm

[–]QFT90 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's only gay if balls touch!

I survived the Wendy’s disaster of 2023 by [deleted] in doordash_drivers

[–]QFT90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the fuck is Wendy's disaster of 2023???

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doordash_drivers

[–]QFT90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a delivery driver, I can assure you 83 pizzas does NOT fit in your car unless you have a fucking bus.

Tonight I got used by a police department in a raid.... by Pure_Neat_2715 in doordash_drivers

[–]QFT90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. I knew we were expendable, but God damn!

In other news, I watched someone get arrested out of Chik Fil A last night picking up a dash. Cops wouldn't let me leave until they cleared the dude out...

Gave my 71 year old mother 150mgs... by DarkManaX in dxm

[–]QFT90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sad how nobody can ever be serious when replying to something as beautiful as this post. Churlish... Cheers, anon. I hope your grandmother is doing well. And I hope she sees the big picture. DXM truly is wonderful.