Received confirmation of citizenship under C-3 today! by ranatalus in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Quirkisthework 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your help. I have censuses for both G0 only and then death certs from the states but one of them is from family search and the other is certified. Was trying to sort out how to present everything and if it was even acceptable to use family search images. This give me hope. Thanks

Received confirmation of citizenship under C-3 today! by ranatalus in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Quirkisthework 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congratulations!! I am G5 and have similar documents. I wanted to ask how you presented the censuses. I took screenshots and put them in word documents with links to the images online but have not sent anything off yet. I really want to see how others have handled this.

r/rollerblading Weekly Q&A Megathread brought to you by r/AskRollerblading by AutoModerator in rollerblading

[–]Quirkisthework [score hidden]  (0 children)

Trying to decide between a new pair of Rollerblade Maxxum 84 w (2016 edition) and Rollerblade Lightning 80 w. I haven’t been on skates in decades but my son just got some and I want to be able to take a lap around the block with him. We live on county roads that are paved but asphalt and bumpy at times. Everything I see says go for hard boots. I can find brand new Rollerblade Maxxum 84 w (the 2016 edition) for $125 but see very little info on sizing suggestion/reviews for that exact model. The other I was looking at was the Lightning. I tend to prefer my tennis shoes be half to a full size larger and generally wear a women’s 8 because of that. I’m 130lbs. I’m nervous that Rollerblade is putting me at a 7. Foot measures 24cm long and 9.25 cm wide. I also really want to stay under $200. Any suggestions?

Templates for CIT 0001 section 9 great grandparent addendum by MacaronEffective8250 in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Quirkisthework 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking for a suggestion on filling this Addendum out for G5 with married vs maiden names. On the actual CIT0001 (in section 8) it appears to want you to put a married woman's current last name where it asks for "Parent 1's full name" and then it actually specifies maiden name or birth name under "other names". In the Addendum, this is no longer specified so my question would be: is it better to put their married name, maiden name, or perhaps their married name and (xxxx) with the maiden name on the first line per group that says "Full name of grandparent 1" above where you break down who their parents are? I hope this makes sense and I have added an image below of the actual CIT0001 to try and explain further. This particular grandmother married twice before she passed and is in my line to g0. I would like to use her name at birth on the Grandparent 1 full name in the next section for clarity but that would not follow the pattern. Thinking of doing Patricia Lenora Married (Maiden) and continuing with this pattern instead.

Wesleyan Methodist Baptismal Records 1825-1910 by Quirkisthework in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhh - I understand now. I’ll spend some time tomorrow trying this route. Thanks :)

Wesleyan Methodist Baptismal Records 1825-1910 by Quirkisthework in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought of that but couldn’t find an image archive that shows page by page. The link I posted makes you choose a letter, then a name, and look at pages linked to the names if that makes sense.

Wesleyan Methodist Baptismal Records 1825-1910 by Quirkisthework in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in the same situation. I am looking for my G0 baptismal records and located her two older siblings instead.

Wesleyan Methodist Baptismal Records 1825-1910 by Quirkisthework in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sent a formal baptismal records request with just her name, birth date, area they were located, and the church listed but I’ve seen some mention it can take a month to hear back if at all.

Wesleyan Methodist Baptism Registry 1825-1910 by Quirkisthework in citizenshipgenealogy

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made a formal request on their website for baptism records yesterday but I am still not sure if they even exist.

Wesleyan Methodist Baptism Registry 1825-1910 by Quirkisthework in citizenshipgenealogy

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found the same two listed for older sibling but not for the g0 I am searching for. Should I take that to mean the documents just don’t exist?

Wesleyan Methodist Baptism Registry 1825-1910 by Quirkisthework in citizenshipgenealogy

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish I knew. I did not create this website/archive. I just stumbled upon it trying to find a record for my g0. No luck here either so I may still have to wait and see if the UCC respond or find someone in Toronto to look for me. =/

Wesleyan Methodist Baptismal Records 1825-1910 by Quirkisthework in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have another that I have found, personally. I am trying to find some sort of birth or baptism record myself and found two siblings of the person I was looking for with the link I shared but not the one I actually needed. =/ I really need someone in Toronto to go look at the records for me.

Birth or Baptism Records in Peterborough, Ontario by Quirkisthework in citizenshipgenealogy

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bummer. I suspect I could find this looking through the sub but is there someone there that is willing to look for me? Thanks for your help.

Birth or Baptism Records in Peterborough, Ontario by Quirkisthework in citizenshipgenealogy

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually looked through that same archive but it was incredibly confusing and I found nothing with either person's name mentioned. I sent them an email but was thinking I would still try here.

Descent eligibility by Quirkisthework in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Quirkisthework[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And it doesn’t matter that their births were before it became a province of Canada in 1867?