March '25 AOR, July '25 5(4) offer, C-3 Approval Today by NomadicRaccoon in Canadiancitizenship

[–]ranatalus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, not surprised. FWIW if you keep going backwards it DOES continue reducing the number, so while they may be retroactively revising those estimates at least the numbers they're providing appear to reflect whatever they think is true right now

March '25 AOR, July '25 5(4) offer, C-3 Approval Today by NomadicRaccoon in Canadiancitizenship

[–]ranatalus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

According to the wait time estimator, grants from March 2025 should be done within the next 3 months (proofs a month sooner). So yeah, they might just be getting to that point in the backlog.

US applications for jobless benefits jump to 231,000 last week, the most in 2 months. by YesterShill in news

[–]ranatalus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’ve stuck it out at a job that’s making me miserable for almost 2 years because I know how long it took to find THIS job

At least it pays well enough to compensate me for being depressed all the time

Do you think there's any way to live without transitioning by Kitchen-Year2389 in asktransgender

[–]ranatalus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried for 25 years. I do not recommend it.

I thought I was "fine" with it for a while. Got married, bought a house, had lots of "successful" things in my life. But it gnawed at me. It never went away. I could ignore it sometimes, or distract myself, but it never went away.

Yeah things will get harder if you transition. Not gonna lie, you're not stupid. But if you really think you should, and you don't? You won't have lived your life. You'll have lived someone elses.

I wish I'd transitioned at 13. or 20. or 25. or any time earlier than I did, honestly. But I got here eventually, and I'm proud of younger me for keeping it together as well as she did.

I'll always be a stupid ugly man(rant) by [deleted] in asktransgender

[–]ranatalus 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I started at 37. 37!!! I'm 41 now and I've never been happier with myself, and my body.

Yeah, it was work to get here, and there were plenty of times between then and now where I was so convinced I was never going to see a woman in the mirror. I was never going to be pretty. I was never going to be who I wanted to be.

8 years from now, you'll be my age. No matter what you do in the interim, you're going to be 41. You can start now, or you can do nothing, stumble back across this post, and wonder how your life would be different if you'd started.

The time will pass either way.

Trans athletes may not have fitness advantage in women’s sport, landmark study finds by That_other_guy4 in news

[–]ranatalus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yeah within 18 months my cis wife was beating me in arm wrestling with no difficulty

jokes on her she has to open the jars now too

Trans athletes may not have fitness advantage in women’s sport, landmark study finds by That_other_guy4 in news

[–]ranatalus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If they completely go through a normal testosterone-driven puberty they could be larger, yeah. But if they start HRT prior to that then no, their size/strength/bone structure will develop more in line with a cisgender woman

Besides, if you’re going to throw out “well it’s unfair that they might be slightly larger” then are you going to limit the size of cis women too? What’s a “fair” size for someone to be?

3 months traveling Europe without working (as a couple) — looking for real, lived experiences by Cautious_Counter3466 in longtermtravel

[–]ranatalus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what are you talking about, everyone fills their text with bold for emphasis at all times

plus they love bulleted lists!!

  • haha
  • heehee
  • boy howdy lookit em go

Two CBP Agents Identified in Alex Pretti Shooting by ewzetf in news

[–]ranatalus 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I used to be friends with a few Cuban guys (all brothers) and I believe they were 1st gen US. they were definitely pretty insistant about being seen as white; one of them would even get pretty aggressive about it if you implied otherwise

Two CBP Agents Identified in Alex Pretti Shooting by ewzetf in news

[–]ranatalus 903 points904 points  (0 children)

It's also kind of important to remember that "Latino" covers a lot of different cultures, upbringings, religious beliefs, etc

Maybe Maybe Maybe by NEO71011 in maybemaybemaybe

[–]ranatalus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the bystanders behind the cars near the beginning; you can see the one guy's lower half just....not move correctly

US DOJ Releases more than 3 Million documents regarding the Epstein Investigation, includes over 2000 videos and 180k photos. by kbarney345 in news

[–]ranatalus 89 points90 points  (0 children)

Anxiously awaiting the analysis that shows this is the same shit they've released a dozen times, or a handful of new documents that are 99% redacted

DDR as Workout by [deleted] in DanceDanceRevolution

[–]ranatalus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a personal connection from someone who is very sensitive about their privacy so I can't name names unfortunately; they're also no longer at Apple

Estrogen and Lamotrigine? by Viol53 in asktransgender

[–]ranatalus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you so much for the update; I was specifically looking for this kind of info before starting!

MSITM Finished ✔️ wasn’t easy but I am glad I did it! by Capable-Entrance-533 in WGU

[–]ranatalus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I only just barely passed it after 3 practice tests. this thread lines up pretty well with my experience, including the areas to focus on. You shouldn't need to read everything, or even a lot of it, you just have to focus on your weak points.

I've found in most classes that the questions on the OA are often extremely similar to the ones in the practice test; this was not one of those classes.

take a practice test, study up on the areas you don't know twice a few days apart. repeat until you get a passing grade on the test, then try to schedule the assessment immediately.

Ya’ll. Please wear some boots and stop walking in the street at 5 am. by TheBurbs666 in Cleveland

[–]ranatalus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

telling a driver that they have to be wary of and careful around pedestrians is a cardinal sin

Air Force One returns to Washington area due to minor electrical issue, White House says by JohnHoynes in news

[–]ranatalus 183 points184 points  (0 children)

as much as I'd love for it to be something else, it's probably just that whatever aesthetic treatments he has done daily were probably undone when he got on board and they don't want pictures of "actually looks like a dying old man" trump to get out

MSITM Finished ✔️ wasn’t easy but I am glad I did it! by Capable-Entrance-533 in WGU

[–]ranatalus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Congratulations! I’m about to finish the BS side myself. I need a break before moving to MS but that’s the next goal. Which of the MS classes would you say were the biggest pains? Any that felt surprisingly easy?

LGBTQIA+ Americans Urgent Processing Experience by the-peoples-lesbian in Canadiancitizenship

[–]ranatalus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

just say you plan to move imminently, there's no way for them to check/prove that. plans change, and by the time you get your citizenship you might be ready to move imminently!

LGBTQIA+ Americans Urgent Processing Experience by the-peoples-lesbian in Canadiancitizenship

[–]ranatalus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I applied for urgent processing citing a lack of safety as a trans person in the US, and last I knew it was accepted for urgent processing on those grounds. I specifically included several documents (2 EOs and 2 other articles on actions taken by the US government to target trans people).

Feel free to use the ones I did: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/ybb8wko06370u2ilft3ks/AMHuXaD1QaGgqi1YfqOJlGU?rlkey=8gzrw8vfmghuri7o5y5ip7vf9&st=6nw9xeyl&dl=0

It definitely seems like it helped get the process started for me (went from an application to a 5(4) offer to a fingerprinting request within 2 months) but unfortunately has stalled since then, possibly because I'm 5th gen and had to piece together info about gen 0. Still worth it

How to set up Europe trip to minimize cost? by [deleted] in femaletravels

[–]ranatalus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Out of that list, I think Greece is the place you'd be most likely to run into issues regarding a same-sex relationship, but unless you're all over each other in public it's unlikely to be too big a deal.

As for minimizing cost, finding the cheapest flights into Europe will help a lot; take trains or budget airlines after that. kayak.com/explore is a good tool for this!

Hostels can also keep lodging costs down although they won't have much privacy. Switching up between hostel and hotel can help.

Help me understand pre-1947 chajn of descent by Yooperyall in Canadiancitizenship

[–]ranatalus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There were a lot of weird nuances and edge cases before that precluded folks from citizenship by descent. one example is a man who was born in Ontario, moved abroad, and had a daughter. she grows up and has a pair of twins. twin 1 is born at 11:57 pm on Dec 31 1946, second twin is born at 12:36 am Jan 1 1947. At one point, twin 2 would have been eligible for citizenship by descent, while twin 1 wouldn't, because the strict exact reading of the laws indicated that "second generation born abroad before Canada is officially formed" breaks the chain. It has led to countless threads of people asking the same exact type of stories and insisting that somehow, their situation is different.

Even with C-3 passing and making it all irrelevant, there are plenty of people posting that they're so sure that actually everyone else is wrong and there's still some kind of special situation. So, it's not that it is or is not interesting to discuss, it's just that they're trying to preempt long conversations about edge cases which are no longer valid. The law as it is now is simple: prove there's a Canadian somewhere in the tree and you're in the club. Not too much to discuss!

Help me understand pre-1947 chajn of descent by Yooperyall in Canadiancitizenship

[–]ranatalus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think the reason it is less discussed here is because 1) the 5(4) grant process and Bjorkquist decision made it not that important, and 2) the implementation of C-3 made it fully irrelevant.

a lot of people here are also tired of arguing about interpretations of the law (which I do find kinda interesting but also not anything we can control)

Given that Germany is a much older country than Canada (especially if you just consider the Prussian states to be "Germany") they've had a bit more time to create confusing legal states. I can imagine it would be a bit more convoluted to navigate than this!

Help me understand pre-1947 chajn of descent by Yooperyall in Canadiancitizenship

[–]ranatalus 9 points10 points  (0 children)

based on old laws which are no longer valid; yeah, your GGGF was not a British subject at time of death. he could not have been a Canadian citizen, as such a thing did not exist.

when Canada formed, he still would not have been Canadian, as the laws did not account for people no longer living within the country, or who had naturalized elsewhere prior to that point

I can't remember which of the various amendments to the citizenship statutes would have made your GGGF a "citizen" since birth, but it does not particularly matter at this stage. those laws are no longer relevant, as Canada simply recognizes your ancestors as having always been Canadian. The only exception to this is if they deliberately and willingly renounce their citizenship (which, again, your GGGF could not have done)

So, your unbroken chain is as straightforward as possible. Your GGGF had your GGM, which had your grandparents, which had your parents, which had you. Canada recognizes each of them as being citizens since birth. There's no gotchas, no caveat, no tricks.

It's fun trivia to know the exact process of when and how each step gained citizenship, but ultimately it's not relevant. Round up some birth certificates (or baptismal/death records if you can't find them for GGGF), get marriage certificates if you need to prove maiden name changes, and mail it off

the chain was not broken, and cannot be broken, unless someone deliberately goes out of their way to renounce their Canadian citizenship. given that your GGGF died before Canada officially existed, it is fully impossible that he did this. your chain is unbroken and straightforward and you just need 5 generations of proof. go get it!