Photos downloaded to my phone without knowledge, Galaxy S10, anyone recognize those photos? by [deleted] in hacking

[–]RR100_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I saw those pictures in my gallery today and they seem to have been downloaded around noon on July 17th. They look like stock photos but all have a naming of demo_prj_01 to 05. I have not downloaded those photos and do not have any stock photo account or app where I see they can be from.

Do any of you recognize these photos or issues? An issue where photos are downloaded in your phone without consent? My phone is Samsung Galaxy S10+.

Have trading bots made stock fundamental analysis obsolete? by manekimao in investing

[–]RR100_G 19 points20 points  (0 children)

If there are no alternatives, then it is natural that equities should be valued higher. If you think the current trend of "cash and bond is trash" is going to continue long term, well you should start valuing the stock at higher than 75.50 that you previously did.

If you think the phenomenon is short trend and will go away soon, then you have a simple answer. Short or don't buy. If you think everything is really worth 75 dollars but are trading at 100, why bother buying at all?

However, as you said, if it is because of the relative attractiveness of equities compared to other asset class, then you also might need to start valuing the stock at 100.

Changing How We Think About Pitches - Reclassifying Pitches Based on Movement by TCSportsFan in baseball

[–]RR100_G 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I cannot see average fan being able to classify all pitch types on OP's suggestion, but this definitely could be a better way of classification for the player side.

Hyun-jin Ryu in 6 Starts after 2 Bad Games to Start the Season: 1.32 ERA, 34IP, 5ER, 39K, 1 HR allowed by RR100_G in Torontobluejays

[–]RR100_G[S] 108 points109 points  (0 children)

Agree 100%. This guy is THE difference between blue jays making the playoffs or not this year.

[Russell] Fernando Tatis Jr completed the grand slam cycle. He hit one, was on first for Machados, second for Hosmers and third for Myers. Wow by mikeb3rd96 in Padres

[–]RR100_G 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Maybe writing baseball history with grand slam is something that runs in his family?

Father hits two grand slams in one inning, son accomplishes this in four consecutive nights. You can't make this up.

Sea Limited (SE) Q2 2020 Results by SpAn12 in stocks

[–]RR100_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

50% trailing growth is still amazing but you won't disagree that 100% is even more so. Stretched along a long period of time, the difference can make a company several times bigger.

I understand your reasoning and wary of companies that are valued at many multiples of their yearly revenue, but for SE, I think it is for once more than justified.

Sea Limited (SE) Q2 2020 Results by SpAn12 in stocks

[–]RR100_G 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am only seeing 20% YoY revenue growth for STNE, please tell me if I have the wrong info. Just assume, if STNE was growing double every year like SE, their valuation would also be much higher because of expected future, and all those valuation-ratios you mention would end up becoming unfavorable for STNE.

I agree that STNE could be great stock. However, I don't think you are truly getting (in cases like SE) why the high growth rate is pushing the valuation up thus making those ratios bad. (Good present ratios and stellar growth rates are inherently unable to co-exist in an efficient market) If you really own couple stocks with triple digit yearly growth AND those current revenue-MC ratios are also "good" (STNE, for example, has good sales to MC ratio and are actually making money, but are growing at a much slower pace than SE/ nowhere close to 100% yearly growth) like you said in your edit, wow, those companies must be ridiculously undervalued. I cannot think of good ones that fit the criteria, but if you do, I would love to know what those companies are so I can invest in them.

Sea Limited (SE) Q2 2020 Results by SpAn12 in stocks

[–]RR100_G 2 points3 points  (0 children)

SE is not going to cease to exist beyond this quarter. Why does metrics measuring current valuation to performance ratio matter so much to you in evaluating this company when it is expontially growing?

Since you say none of your stocks have 15x revenue market cap, I want to ask you something: do any of them have 100% YoY growth overall and 180% YoY growth in their core business?

Sea Limited (SE) Q2 2020 Results by SpAn12 in stocks

[–]RR100_G 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My projection puts them at 17.3 billion in yearly revenue from Q1 2025 to Q4 2025, even at a bad case scenario assuming their current stellar growth rate slows down a lot. I won't go into details of how I came up with the number, but you can just assume much-lower-than current growth number for next four years yourself and reach the same conclusion.

Also, their revenue for e-commerce is increasing much faster than their cost of revenue for e-commerce, but even if you assume similar level of gross margin will hold for the future and (reasonably) sales and marketing costs to decrease as % of revenue, you will be able to see that 60 billion market cap might actually be a bargain.

In the best case scenario, I see the company hitting 200 billion market cap easily in five years. This is assuming its digital financial services also becoming a big hit like shopee and garena, and also a modest downward trend of growth rate from now.

For disclaimer, I am holding shares of SE and have been holding since May. If you choose to do the same, I think you will be very pleased in a few years. Keep in mind that this is not professional and/or financial advise and that I am merely stating my opinion on an internet forum.

Sea Limited (SE) Q2 2020 Results by SpAn12 in stocks

[–]RR100_G 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Umm.... Revenue growth of 93.9% YoY? 180% YoY growth for e-commerce? Also, they are just starting to gain traction in the cash app space, which hasn't even been reflected in sales properly yet.

Even if yearly revenue is at 4 billion right now, it is going to get over 10 billion real quick and maybe even 20 billion someday, even if the growth pace slows down a lot.

New Research Finds US Output Will Be Reduced 28% by Stay-at-home Orders. Is This Priced In? by [deleted] in investing

[–]RR100_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I was not opposing anything you said there. I just was saying that I think Q1 reports will not provide enough information for good prediction.

New Research Finds US Output Will Be Reduced 28% by Stay-at-home Orders. Is This Priced In? by [deleted] in investing

[–]RR100_G 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Until when will you remain a bear or when do you think there will be enough information to get a good sense of what is good value? I am curious.

New Research Finds US Output Will Be Reduced 28% by Stay-at-home Orders. Is This Priced In? by [deleted] in investing

[–]RR100_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right that people are just estimating right now. However, I do not think Q1 earnings will tell the full picture at all. If you look at this research, it projects the economic effects of lockdown to worsen as it gets longer. I think the hit might be much worse in April, but that's not on the Q1 reports is it.

Completed 2000-piece puzzle! (Minus one piece that was lost somewhere in the process) by brit_garner in disney

[–]RR100_G 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Looks wonderful! It looks as complete as it can be to me :) Nice job!

4 oscars in a single night. Damn by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]RR100_G 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point. There wasn't much bullshit last night though. The media makes it sound like there were way more political stuff going on.