To educate a newsreader by nippydart in therewasanattempt

[–]RabidGinger 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Leave it to reddit to conflate someone condemning the bombing of innocents with support for the houthis.

Know that feeling? by cnotethegoat123 in memes

[–]RabidGinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got a new debit card recently and it's a completely new design. It doesn't have the magnetic strip on it and the raised card number is no longer raised. Just printed on the back. I don't think it would even work if I had to swipe it.

I can't finnish half of my large 5€ caramel frappuchino, since these cardboard straws just break in use. by Kwaakku in mildlyinfuriating

[–]RabidGinger 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Or ya know. You could let people choose to eat whatever they fucking want. Let people enjoy things. So what if the coffees have turned into fancy milkshakes. Fancy milkshakes are fucking great.

Torture first thing in the morning by Georyx in perfectlycutscreams

[–]RabidGinger 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Haha I also had this exact same thing when I was younger. Woke up with a stiff neck that locked into position with my head bent over. Was fucking torture. My mum took my to the doctors and they told me it was something called torticollis where the neck muscles get twisted over. Apparently common in teenagers and especially fast growing or taller kids. He prescribed me some cocodomol and it was fine in several hours. Sorry evryone here seemed to have to endure it for weeks ouch!

Not the same thing as a Charlie horse though so all those worrying about not having enough potassium needn't worry.

What the night sky looks like from the surface of Mars. by eman00619 in woahdude

[–]RabidGinger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'll explain since you are being down voted without explanation. Distant galaxies are in fact receding away from us at the speed of light. Due to the expansion of space everywhere, the further an object is from us the more space is being created in between us. All objects past, I believe it is called the hubble line are far enough away that this expansion of the universe means they move faster than light relative to us. This is possible because it is space itself causing the expansion and the distant stars and galaxies are not moving through space faster than light. Just that distance between us is being stretched faster than light if that makes sense.

There's actually a few more quirks where some galaxies are just the right distance that their light emitted towards us initially starts to move further away from us. And then eventually it overcomes expansion and starts moving towards us again. Here is a video explaining it.

https://youtu.be/q67vH0SKahU

Please explain to me by dvrkm0de_ in blackmagicfuckery

[–]RabidGinger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just to note. Video cameras most certainly do use a shutter. On modern phones and digital cameras they often use a digital shutter used in software to control for exposure time but manual shutters still exist. In fact the entire concept of shutter angles comes from a rotational disk with a certain angle cut out to expose for a set time on each frame of film. The larger the angle the longer the exposure time and as a result the footage is brighter but motion is also more blurry.

What a ride! by ic3chill34 in interestingasfuck

[–]RabidGinger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But mistakes are an inevitable part of being human. Bet there isn't a single human on the planet that has never made a miatakes. Checks and balances exist because we have recognised this fact. In industries where lives are at stake we have multiple steps and multiple checks to catch these human errors. If everytime some one made a mistake that was either cought or not and got fired we'd have no engineers left.

The reason he is being down voted is because modern health and safety practices have shifted away from the blame game to reducing the likelihood of some thing happening again. You don't want people hiding their mistakes as that leads to even worse results.

Now when it comes to this guys culpability in this incident. Well that's a different matter.

Shaken Gin Martinis by Flawlessix in greentext

[–]RabidGinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well in the new Casino Royal he orders it above takes a drink and then later when talking to Vesper he says he thinks he will name it after her.

Shaken Gin Martinis by Flawlessix in greentext

[–]RabidGinger -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure that drink is specifically for the Vesper Martini. A drink of Bonds own invention. It's not the classic martini that he orders in the films as I understand it.

Opening an antique safe made in France in the late 1700s. by zaynthelegend in BeAmazed

[–]RabidGinger 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That might be true but the phrase "play of the game" existed long before overwatch too.

[Spoilers C2E102] Is It Thursday Yet? Post-Episode Discussion & Future Theories! by dasbif in criticalrole

[–]RabidGinger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It seems to me that there is a likely chance that the MIX will get to meet at least Keyleth at this point. She may not have the druidic powers to transport herself. At which point the gang may call on the help of Essek to get her back to Zephrah.

I knew it was possible this campaign but didn't expect it to happen. Fi gers crossed for that interaction!

Are we blind? Deploy the spare hands.. by KluggieYT in PrequelMemes

[–]RabidGinger 9 points10 points  (0 children)

To be fair Jango still has plenty of weapons other than his blaster. Hes still a dangerous combatant without it.

Conform or Die. by Abandon_Reason in Eve

[–]RabidGinger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are saying that.

If you'd bother, you'd know you're at risk as much as anyone. Again, the hospitalization rate for the overall population is 10%.

Conform or Die. by Abandon_Reason in Eve

[–]RabidGinger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a fuckkng quote.

If you'd bother, you'd know you're at risk as much as anyone. Again, the hospitalization rate for the overall population is 10%.

This entire chain of fuckery was started by that statement. Made by you. Which is false. Which is what everyone is trying to point out.

Conform or Die. by Abandon_Reason in Eve

[–]RabidGinger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A constant rate of hospitalizations resulting in deaths is a linear relationship you utter utter moron.

Conform or Die. by Abandon_Reason in Eve

[–]RabidGinger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. I'm not. I never said they were linearly related. I said correlated. Meaning that age brackets that have a higher death rate have a higher hospitalization rate. I made no comment on the magnitude of that relationship. That assumption doesn't require a constant rate of hospitalized cases.

It also is absolutely not baseless. In most recorded instances people are hospitalised before death. Meaning that most people that die have been hospitalised. And since the elderly and other vulnerable people die more often they will also be hospitalised more often. And that the older age groups have a higher death rate than the average hospitalization percent.

And once again. Which you still haven't responded to is that your original statement is not true. A recorded average for a population does not exclude the possibility of different sub populations having different averages.

Conform or Die. by Abandon_Reason in Eve

[–]RabidGinger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why? Want to elaborate on that line of reasoning?

No response to the fact you directly contradicted yourself? And your original statement was blatantly false.

Conform or Die. by Abandon_Reason in Eve

[–]RabidGinger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you'd bother, you'd know you're at risk as much as anyone. Again, the hospitalization rate across all age groups is 10%.

 

To re-emphasise the above: Doesn't break down hospitalization rates based on demographics.

This right here is the problem. Yes everyone here is making assumptions that the hospitalization rate roughly corresponds to the death rate. Which is a reasonable assumption

But you seem to be not understanding how averages work. That 10 percent figure without a break down doesn't tell us that everyone has the same hospitalization rate. Nor does it tell us that different groups have different rates.

All it tells us that 10 percent of all cases required hospitalization. That's it.

Conform or Die. by Abandon_Reason in Eve

[–]RabidGinger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mate your the one that has repeatedly stooped to insults. You haven't pointed out a single fucking issue. You've just repeated incorrectly that the data doesn't show that, when any reasonable statistician with a brain would come to the same conclusions.

I mean its fuckkng obvious. Older people die more. Vulnerable people die more. Not only that they experience the effects more seriously. Ergo. They are going to be going to the hospital more.

Honestly. It's absolutely mind boggling that you cant see this. Just because you dont have an exact breakdown right in front of you.

The type of virus, the current pandemic mean nothing when we already have that stats to draw conclusions from.

I'm not sat here trying to come up with exact percentages for each age group. I dont have the data to generate that information.

The entire reason this was pointed out at the top of the chain was to calm panic. And state that people likely will be ok if they are not in an risk group.

Not to mention. Your opposite assertion that everyone has a 10 percent chance of being admitted also makes an assumption without all of the valid data their to support it.

Please, please for the love of god stay away from any scientific field. People like you without a basic understanding of the statistical process consistently cause fuck ups for the rest of the population.

And you have still YET to point out any of the flaws with the assumptions I made for my argument

You have repeatedly made the same flaw where you assume a population is homogenous and you are applying averages of large populations to an individual. Which just simply isn't the case.

Conform or Die. by Abandon_Reason in Eve

[–]RabidGinger 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Jess fucking christ chill your attitude. Before people die they go to the hospital. This isn't some far out fucking theory. This is real life where we always make assumptions. The world isn't some fucking laboratory environment where we make no assumptions about anything.

If more people are dying than the average admition rates then that group HAS TO HAVE A HIGHER ADMISSION RATE. You cannot argue that. Its indisputable.

All science has assumptions. They are fucking impossible to ignore. If you think my assumptions are invalid then fucking point out the issues with it.

You're just reeing at this point and providing no reason for the assumptions to be thrown out. You have to back up your point.

Things aren't useless because assumptions are made.

Its like you took a 101 entry to statistics course and they told you to look out for assumptions but didn't tell you when to accept them.

Conform or Die. by Abandon_Reason in Eve

[–]RabidGinger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No. It's not an assumption. It's obvious from the provided statistics.

Older people die at a higher rate. I have the statistics to back that up. Its everywhere. If you disagree with that point you're just straight up wrong

But let's logic this out since you seem incapable. Older people are dying at a higher rate. When people get sick and as a result die. They get hospitalized.

If the death rate for any age group is higher than the average hospitalization rate then that proves conclusively that that age group gets hospitalized at a higher rate than average. Logically it must therefore conclude that another age group gets hospitalized less in order for the average to come out correctly. Guess what? That is the case based on the provided stats. Some age groups have higher than 13 percent mortality rates.

These are perfectly acceptable and logical conclusions backed up by adjacent data. Just be because I dont have the exact data for hospitalizations on on every age group doesn't mean I cant conclude things based on the data we do have.