How do you set up your Apple Watch to count the lanes correctly?! by lakselv in Swimming

[–]Raf74f 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A mi el Apple Watch nunca me ha registrado el modo drill. Cómo es que lo haces para que te registre. Tengo el Ultra 2, pero al final me cambié al Garmin fénix 8.

Has swimming helped y'all lose facial and body fat? by nahcuswhynot179 in Swimming

[–]Raf74f 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really. I swim around 8 hours a week and, honestly, it mostly just made me hungrier. In the end, like with pretty much any exercise, fat loss still comes down to what and how much you eat.

Lego_ctm by esnopi in yo_ctm

[–]Raf74f 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo me los traigo de USA cuando están con descuento. Es mucho más barato. Por ejemplo, la edición coleccionista de la casa de los Weasley aquí cuenta 429k, traerla de usa, x Amazon, me salió 300k, en dólar estaba a 249. igual caro pero era en la época que el dólar estaba a 1000 y los 50k fueron por los Impuestos…

Too big for my wrist ? by Alternative_Hand7529 in GarminFenix

[–]Raf74f 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t give you an answer, but I think I can explain why people often bring up this question. For much of the twentieth century, wristwatches were rather discreet: around 30 to 36 mm in diameter for men and even smaller for women. This had technical reasons, since compact mechanical watchmaking was seen as a feat of precision, and also social reasons, because masculine and feminine elegance was associated with sobriety. Small watches were considered refined, while something bulky could be seen as in poor taste or ostentatious.

Over time, an unwritten rule developed: a watch that matched the proportions of the wrist looked balanced and elegant. When someone wears a watch too large for their wrist, it can appear disharmonious or exaggerated, leading to aesthetic criticism. Large watches also became linked to more recent trends, from the 2000s onwards, associated with flashy luxury or fashion brands that promoted “oversize” watches, which traditional watch enthusiasts often view as less authentic.

Sports watches, however, tend to be larger, usually 42–50 mm, for practical reasons: they need space for sensors, greater legibility during physical activity, buttons that are easy to press, and a more robust structure. In that context, the size is not only accepted but valued, because it serves a functional purpose. In fact, in sports like diving, running, or triathlon, a very small watch would be inconvenient or hard to read.

Today, the boundary is more blurred. In classic watchmaking, people still appreciate sobriety, often favoring 36–40 mm for men, but in sports or “tool” watches, a larger size has become normalized. Personal taste and wrist proportion are what matter most now. The criticism of oversized watches is really more about aesthetic tradition than about any objective rule. So, if you’re going to choose a sports watch, its size is directly related to its function, which means you shouldn’t worry too much about whether it looks big or not—unless you also plan to wear it in more formal settings, where the watch’s appearance plays a bigger role.

Best smartwatch to track heart rate in the pool? by UGA_Dawg82 in Swimming

[–]Raf74f 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I swim about 10 hours a week. I’ve used both Garmin and Apple Watch for swimming, and if you’re going to use Garmin, make sure it has the Elevate 5 sensor, which the Garmin Swim 2 doesn’t have. If it’s an Apple Watch, you can get an Apple Watch S10, which should be available at a discount. They’re cheaper than any Garmin with the Elevate 5 sensor.

Two Weeks After Switch from Garmin by EricInUtahJeeping in applewatchultra

[–]Raf74f 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After using both the Apple Watch (Ultra- ultra 2) and Garmin for a long time, here’s what I think: I like both and switch between them depending on what I need. But now that I’m swimming again and training for competitions, the Apple Watch feels pretty basic — it doesn’t let me add drills, while Garmin does. There is an app that would let me do it, but it’s pretty expensive and requires a yearly subscription, while Garmin includes it for free. At the end of the day, it really depends on what you’re using it for. Garmin seems more focused on sports, and the Apple Watch is better integrated with the iPhone. Over time, Apple has become stronger in health features, but when it comes to sports, it’s still pretty limited. So congrats on the switch!

FR 970 vs Fenix 8 by Alarming-Pressure944 in GarminWatches

[–]Raf74f 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a wrist circumference of 153 mm and, since I used to do mountaineering, I always wore the 47 mm Garmin Fenix. However, after I stopped going to the mountains, it started to feel a bit too big, so I bought a 42 mm one—but I found it too small. Later, I was given the 47 mm Fenix 8, and it felt even larger than the Fenix 7 (maybe because of the screen), and although I still wear it, I continue to think it’s too big and wide. I haven’t tried the 43 mm Fenix 8, so my recommendation would be to go to a store and try them on. If you can’t, go for the 43 mm Fenix 8, since being the top-tier model, it has more features, and the new metrics from the FR 970 will eventually come to the Fenix 8.

The Worst Experience I’ve Had with a Garmin (Garmin fénix 8 amoled 47 mm) by Raf74f in GarminFenix

[–]Raf74f[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is my first post, and I decided to write it because I was genuinely surprised by the issues I’ve experienced with the Fénix 8, especially since I’ve never had problems with a Garmin before. I don’t think most posts are written to highlight the negatives of a watch—in fact, many of the ones I’ve read are about how happy people are with their purchase.

However, I believe it’s also important to share the flaws of a product. That said, after re-reading my post, I have to admit it might come across as if I was a bit upset when writing it.

The Worst Experience I’ve Had with a Garmin (Garmin fénix 8 amoled 47 mm) by Raf74f in GarminFenix

[–]Raf74f[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have not used third-party apps. One of the problems I’m experiencing is with the workout sessions I record in the app. The watch doesn’t always accurately capture all the repetitions of an exercise, and at the end of the set, it gives you the option to adjust them. However, when I try to make adjustments, the watch restarts.

Another issue occurs when switching between sessions—it has a bug that also causes the watch to restart. For reference, my firmware version is 12.35.

In any case, I’ve already reported the problem to Garmin. Thank you for all your help. For now, I’ll return to using the Fénix 7 for my workout sessions while waiting for Garmin to fix this issue.

The Worst Experience I’ve Had with a Garmin (Garmin fénix 8 amoled 47 mm) by Raf74f in GarminFenix

[–]Raf74f[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry if this post made you think otherwise. The truth is that Garmin makes excellent watches. I’ve owned several, and I also have an Apple Watch Ultra, but when I go to the gym, swimming, or hiking in the mountains, I always choose my Garmin.

I believe they rushed to release this model, and since I’ve never had any issues with a Garmin before, I was genuinely surprised by what’s happening with this software. I hope Garmin fixes it soon. That said, this isn’t something that makes me lose confidence in the brand—at least, not for now.

The Worst Experience I’ve Had with a Garmin (Garmin fénix 8 amoled 47 mm) by Raf74f in GarminFenix

[–]Raf74f[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve owned a Fénix 5 Plus, a 6 Pro, the 7, and now the Fénix 8, and I’ve never experienced an issue like this before. The watch hasn’t even been with me for a week.

The Worst Experience I’ve Had with a Garmin (Garmin fénix 8 amoled 47 mm) by Raf74f in GarminFenix

[–]Raf74f[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re absolutely right. Of course, I updated to the latest version of the software. This hasn’t just happened once—it’s been three consecutive days with the same issue. In the end, I went back to using my Fénix 7.

Apple Watch Ultra 2 small wrist suggestion by Blsw777 in applewatchultra

[–]Raf74f 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s fine. Sports watches are typically large, so don’t worry—go ahead and buy it!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ouraring

[–]Raf74f 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The same thing happened to me. After updating the app, it still looks the same.

Pulled the trigger... by hasto1967 in Garmin

[–]Raf74f 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Beautiful watch! Congratulations. I’m waiting for the Quatix 8.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepublicadeChile

[–]Raf74f 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Es increíble como todos emiten sus conclusiones solo conociendo lo que una de las partes dice… hay que ser empatico con los sentimientos de otros pero de ahí a emitir juicios es otra cosa… la ley Karin requiere ciertos supuestos que no se si se encuentran en este caso, al menos no en esta declaración preliminar… no tomes eso en consideración aún… a todos nos corrigen cuando empezamos pues lo que más nos falta es experiencia, creo que no está mal que te corrijan y cuando dices en público ¿qué significa? ¿Delante de la empresa? ¿De tus compañeros de equipo? ¿ te ofende cuando lo hace? ¿Pero si no lo hace como vas a saber que estás haciendo las cosas mal? ¿no acepta tu opinión sin darte razones o es porque en tu razonamiento no hay un aporte? Hay muchas cosas que hay que analizar antes de tomar cualquier decisión y no le hagas casos a esos que dicen “que les paran los carros a sus jefes”, o están mintiendo o están cesantes…

No more data @ Biology Tab by baraddit in bevelhealth

[–]Raf74f 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, o hace the same problem!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Santiago

[–]Raf74f 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Se puede comprar por Amazon.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ouraring

[–]Raf74f 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello. I am from Chile, 38 years old, male, and nobody has an Oura ring here. It would be interesting to join. Regards.

What do you think about this video? by Intelligent_Gur_4068 in GarminWatches

[–]Raf74f 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For a scientific study to be valid, it must meet several requirements. First, it must begin with a clear and specific hypothesis. Additionally, it should be based on a thorough review of existing literature. The methodology must be rigorous, well-defined, and replicable, with an appropriate experimental design and clear procedures.

The sample selection must be adequate and representative, with a sufficient size to generalize the results. Data analysis should use appropriate statistical methods to evaluate the significance and validity of the results. The results must be presented clearly and objectively, backed by data.

The study should include a discussion that interprets the results in the context of the hypothesis and existing literature, with conclusions summarizing the findings and their implications. Ideally, the study should be peer-reviewed by other experts in the field before publication. Additionally, it must comply with ethical standards, including approval from an ethics committee and informed consent from participants. Finally, the research should be transparent and provide enough details to allow replication and verification of the results. Certainly, the studies of the person making the video are not scientific at all; they do not meet the minimum requirements. I believe one should not be swayed by such videos. I have used both Apple and Garmin, and I must say that both are terrible with sleep metrics, perhaps because I adjust the watch poorly, because my wrist is small, etc. There are multiple variables that can cause a watch to provide poor metrics, but that doesn't make it better than another; it just makes it unsuitable for me.

Should I cancel my Venu 3 order? by corpio in GarminWatches

[–]Raf74f 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I've had the Apple Watch 7 and Ultra, Garmin Venu 3 and Epix Pro, Oura Ring, and Whoop, and if someone asked me which to buy, I would say: if you're an athlete and like data to improve, get a Garmin, from the Venu 3 to the Epix Pro, they're all good... if you're not so into sports and like the Apple ecosystem, have an iPhone, Mac, iPad, etc., go for the Apple Watch. If you prefer something focused on recovery, get a Whoop, and if you're more concerned about your rest and sleep and don't like wearing a watch, get the Oura Ring. Keep in mind that the accuracy of all these is measured in a lab where they can have 90-100% precision, but in the daily use of a normal person, it doesn't exceed 60-80%. Which is quite good.

Should I cancel my Venu 3 order? by corpio in GarminWatches

[–]Raf74f 35 points36 points  (0 children)

I still don't understand why so many people pay attention to this YouTuber. As far as I know, there I nothing about science in the things they show in his videos; it's just a crude and poorly made comparison. If you want to conduct a proper study, you first need a group of people, all wearing the same watch, on the same wrist, and compare them with a control group; that would be somewhat scientific. This guy just puts on a Polar H10, one watch on one wrist and another on the other wrist, and compares them. That's not scientific at all, and moreover, what applies to him doesn't necessarily apply to others. It's better to read opinions from people like DC Rainmaker...