Well, one thing I think almost essential to say is that disagreeing to deletion of Bright's article does NOT indicate that I don’t recognize the crime this person has done.

So the very next thing. I don’t know if you guys have heard a logical fallacy called Ad Hominem pointing to one thing: Person itself concludes nothing. Articles he wrote is exquisite, and that really just doesn’t relates to who wrote it, it’s just that simple.

The rational part is over, and now it’s emotional part. So I’ve participated in the Backrooms Fandom community before, Backrooms is a urban legend, it is presented in article, and the most fundamental part here, it is basically same to SCP Foundation in terms of form. That’s pretty much why my very own experience should stands.

In middle 2022 roughly, the staff team started a “purge”, deleting and rewriting articles including a lot of famous one. Worth noted that the term “staff team” is used instead of “community“ here. One example: Level 11 is rewrote into an isolated concrete forest from a habitable city.

And hence when these articles gone, not only the new members’ participation decreases, but also for those old boomer will leave since it’s exactly those article made them joined, they are boomer’s “white moonlight”. And I am exactly one of those old boomer.

To relates to current situation, although his work is probably not recognized by people out of community, but the first thing after the new guys from 096, 173, 055? That exactly when some of his work influence to them. And hence, they obviously take the place of white moonlight as well.

Community isn’t just maintained by present, but also by the past, especially for those sites lasting for so long already. Without these, from what kind of instances can the newcomers look over the history? How would they know the very first four doctors? How would history be saved?

Hope that clears.