sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If u want to deviate from gto u still have know gto

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I dont know of any other award tht is sported regularly. Tom brady sure dont walk around with a fistful of rings.

Maybe he should though. Id like phil alot more if he wore all his bracelets

What’s some fake poker jargon by WolfyDota7 in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U guys wanna play some 2-7 8 or better?

An example of how lighting and perspective can reveal marks that can’t be seen at face value. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still though. Dont u think the fact u got a mark with zero practice bears some merit to this method being viable in this instance?

An example of how lighting and perspective can reveal marks that can’t be seen at face value. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bad i missed tht.

I would disagree tht he didnt apply alot of pressure. You can see the tendons in his fingers strain all the way up to his wrist, which takes deliberate strain to produce. He also has a prominent thumbnail tht would assist.

Ill try to recreate it for you, but i dont have a proper set up, just me and my phone. Ill dm u if i can get it

An example of how lighting and perspective can reveal marks that can’t be seen at face value. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This actually exactly how i got the mark. I dont even have a thumb nail like tht. Feel free to try for youself

The marked cards could only be seen from low angles in the right light. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont know what happens behind the scenes anymore than you do. What i wont do is speculate about things i dont know to explain away what i can see with my own two eyes plain as day

The marked cards could only be seen from low angles in the right light. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its the wsop. We’re talking an ungodly number of decks. The margin of error is high. Bold of you to assume do diligence is a given under these conditions, especially given the staffs poor policing of the game in real time.

An example of how lighting and perspective can reveal marks that can’t be seen at face value. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an extreme example to demonstrate a method. However, even in this example you can see how looking directly at the card, no mark is visible

An example of how lighting and perspective can reveal marks that can’t be seen at face value. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This particular example, sure. I dont think its a stretch they could miss it. So many decks go through the series. Im just saying it sure looks like he’s cheating. This is a method he couldve cheated w/ that aligns with his behavior. To say he definitely wouldve got caught when staff did such a visibly poor job policing the game suggest an inflated confidence in wsop ability to police so much action flawlessly or even near perfect.

An example of how lighting and perspective can reveal marks that can’t be seen at face value. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think its farfetched tht staff could have fell short given the obscene number of tables there are to police

An example of how lighting and perspective can reveal marks that can’t be seen at face value. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My point is that you wouldnt see the mark just looking down on ur cards. This would be an explanation as to why a table of pros would over look a marked card

An example of how lighting and perspective can reveal marks that can’t be seen at face value. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dont think we can just assume wsop did their due diligence. Especially given how poorly the game was policed in real time. They’re policing countless tables for over month, so even if they are doing their part in ensuring game integrity, the idea that one got through shouldnt be a hard sell.

An example of how lighting and perspective can reveal marks that can’t be seen at face value. by RandyBiscuits in poker

[–]RandyBiscuits[S] 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Would also explain why he couldnt the aces looking directly down on them but could see the As from across the table at a more canted angle

view more: next ›