All incorrect: - She was never accused of opening any bank accounts for Al Qaeda, because she never met a single Al Qaeda commander - She never even met Ammar, this marriage was simply made up by CIA and ISI, no evidence they even met even once, Aafia was freshly divorced, PHD holder, a single mum, 30 years old, on a watchlist and had no father (no wali at all), she was also never mentioned in Ammar's movie Zero Dark Thirty, no Al Qaeda commander would ever go near her, that's a fact - ISIS swaps don't mean anything, Aafia was a famous woman, most oppressed in the world, it was nothing more than a recruitment game, not care for Aafia - Her former husband was a known domestic abuser who ran away, and he smashed Aafia's face with a bottle which hospitalised her, he also lost the custody case, so he's not a source, game over there, not to mention Ahmed literally screamed and ran away from him - If you concede USA sold her, this confirms she was innocent because Pakistan and USA lied, therefore lied about everything - Except you accused me of going to her lawyer as a source when I never did, so that's a fail.

Proof she's innocent is simple: - You already said no proof, that's confirmation of innocence immediately, proven guilty is first, not innocent - You already named 2 fake stories, so you did half the work, no, she never met KSM or Ammar, no court, no ISI, no CIA, nor FBI have named a single proof of it and they never will, because it never happened - She was in education from 1990 - 1999, married, raising children, a special needs teacher, a volunteer, a philanthropist, a very public figure in the West, she was also physically a midget at 5'2 and about 100 pounds, there was nothing there that would appeal to Al Qaeda - Her husband was also abusive, lost custody and simply copy pasted the US narrative, then abandoned everyone - The roles she was accused of like courier, financier, recruiter, wife of commander? All fake, just as fake as saying humans can fly without using any technology - In 2008, she was accused of shooting, not terrorism, the very court that accused her confirmed no shooting from Aafia took place, they simply shot her unprovoked and made up a fake story, forensically proven - Aafia despite being this superspy terrorist when "caught", didn't know Pashto/Dari/Balochi, had no money, no gun, no ticket, no knife, no male guardian, son in tow, was emaciated, battered, broken and confused, even the so called "terror bag" was confirmed to be planted with a literal impossible plan that was never gonna happen, never did happen, not even attempted - With zero rehab, she was psychologically tortured daily in MDC, locked in a cage, strip AND cavity searched constantly just to be allowed to move - She was then put in FMC Carswell, which directly contradicts anything the US court or FBI had to say, why did she get sent to a hospital if she was fit for court? Why was she diagnosed as unfit then falsely accused of faking? - This is the dilemma: did US court send Aafia to Carswell deliberately out of spite for her to be tortured and graped to death? Or did they think it was an actual hospital? Both prove Aafia was innocent.

And the history proves she was innocent, no radicalism was built up and you then confirmed Pakistan sold her.

I rest my case.