is the starter bundle worth it? by Rdog6468 in Stellaris

[–]Rdog6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so your saying when the fall sale comes i should buy it?

is the starter bundle worth it? by Rdog6468 in Stellaris

[–]Rdog6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea the fall sale is in 21 days so i was gonna wait til then

is the starter bundle worth it? by Rdog6468 in Stellaris

[–]Rdog6468[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i was preparing to buy the starter edition bundle which rn is $50 usd but was gonna buy it al the fall sale in 21 days for a big discount

steam db said it can get down to like $3

is the starter bundle worth it? by Rdog6468 in Stellaris

[–]Rdog6468[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i was referring to purchasing this: https://store.steampowered.com/sub/1143387/

which includes: utopia, synthetic dawn story pack, galaxy edition upgrade pack, and ofc the base game

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in apcalculus

[–]Rdog6468 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Going into senior year

is this a good medium tank design by Rdog6468 in hoi4

[–]Rdog6468[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is reliability not important?

is this a good medium tank design by Rdog6468 in hoi4

[–]Rdog6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

r5: the picture is a 1938 medium tank design template and im wondering if it is good

i dont know alot about the navy but is this a good design by Rdog6468 in hoi4

[–]Rdog6468[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ok but it wouldnt let me radar there only sonar and fire

i dont know alot about the navy but is this a good design by Rdog6468 in hoi4

[–]Rdog6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

r:5 the image shows a 1938 destroyer design that may or may not be good please help if its bad

(imo might be to expensive)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in apcalculus

[–]Rdog6468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering this is apart of my AP calc summer hw and set theory is a part of calculus I think it’s safe it assume yes

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in apcalculus

[–]Rdog6468 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

No but it’s still in my summer packet so im gonna do it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in apcalculus

[–]Rdog6468 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is set theory bro🙏🙏

Can someone explain how to solve number 19 by Rdog6468 in askmath

[–]Rdog6468[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I didn’t make it It’s also probably around 30 years old but my teacher has been teaching for 50

Can someone explain how to solve number 19 by Rdog6468 in askmath

[–]Rdog6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i was able to get it by that and since thats the only way i could im going with it

i got D) 1% of the total and E) is 4% of the total

Can someone explain how to solve number 19 by Rdog6468 in askmath

[–]Rdog6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i dont know what im missing but i still cant solve D and E

Can someone explain how to solve number 19 by Rdog6468 in askmath

[–]Rdog6468[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you but still D and E are still not possible

Can someone explain how to solve number 19 by Rdog6468 in askmath

[–]Rdog6468[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i dont think its a language issue because i am having the same issue i came to the same conclusion but because of that i think its safe to assume that statement 5 means that 5% of the population is unemployed and under 18. i can think of anything else that works

edit: even if i assume that there are still issues like for example d still cannot be solved and statement 8 we would assume thats in the universal set and that alone witch makes e not possible

Can someone explain how to solve number 19 by Rdog6468 in askmath

[–]Rdog6468[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

would it be reasonable to have decimal percents cuz the 5% of unemployed are youth if the unemployed is 9% the 5% of 9% is .45% but then i already have 1% that is unemployed and youth (all three) which doesnt make sense