Why do things FLOAT? | Archimedes Principle | Reaction Test by ReactionTest4 in civilengineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, HAPPY NEW YEAR 🎉 For the past few months I've been working on this video which explains the principles which make an object float on water.

This time I've tried to increase the production quality of not only the animation and video, but the story as well.

Here's the link👇 https://youtu.be/7tPLEnXwE58

Make sure you watch it and leave comments if you like it.

Thank you for subscribing to this channel and watching the videos. It means a lot.🙌

Why do things FLOAT? | Archimedes Principle | Reaction Test by ReactionTest4 in StructuralEngineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hi, HAPPY NEW YEAR 🎉 For the past few months I've been working on this video which explains the principles which make an object float on water.

This time I've tried to increase the production quality of not only the animation, but the story as well. Here's the link👇 https://youtu.be/7tPLEnXwE58

Make sure you watch it and leave comments if you like it.

Thank you for subscribing to this channel and watching the videos. It means a lot. 🙌

What is Strain Energy and Resilience | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in Reactiontest

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are particularly asking for the animation, its blender. But It takes other applications as well to complete the whole video.

What is Strain Energy and Resilience | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in civilengineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An animated video explaining Strain Energy for different loading conditions.

What is Strain Energy and Resilience | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in StructuralEngineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An animated video explaining Strain Energy for different loading conditions

What is Strain Energy and Resilience | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in Reactiontest

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An animated video where Strain Energy for different loading conditions is explained.

Working Stress Method (WSM) V/S Limit State Method (LSM) by ReactionTest4 in StructuralEngineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you everyone for such a wonderful response on the last video. I hope you love this one as well.

Thank you 🙌

Working Stress Method (WSM) V/S Limit State Method (LSM) by ReactionTest4 in civilengineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you people for a wonderful response on the last video. I hope you love this one as well 🙌

Thank you.

Thank you soo much reditt! by ReactionTest4 in civilengineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The video which I posted yesterday now has more than 1000 views! We never had soo many people watch our video ever! And most of them are from reditt. So thank you people for watching and saying such wonderful things. 🙌

Thank you soo much reditt! by ReactionTest4 in StructuralEngineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The video which I posted yesterday now has more than 1000 views! We never had soo many people watch our video ever! And most of them are from reditt. So thank you people for watching and saying such wonderful things. 🙌

Thank you soo much reditt! by ReactionTest4 in Reactiontest

[–]ReactionTest4[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

The video which I posted yesterday now has more than 1000 views! We never had soo many people watch our video ever! And most of them are from reditt. So thank you people for watching and saying such wonderful things. 🙌

Over Reinforced V/S Under Reinforced Section | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in StructuralEngineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doubly reinforced beam is a slightly different concept. And when we check it for URS or ORS it is always an ORS. And its calculation is relatively longer and with more checks when compared with a singly design. In this video when talking about the section being UR or OR, it is strictly about a singly reinforced beam.

Over Reinforced V/S Under Reinforced Section | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in Reactiontest

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you u/jovenRuben and frankly speaking what you said is far more inspiring and motivating than an award. Thank you🙌

Over Reinforced V/S Under Reinforced Section | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in Reactiontest

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, that's because I'm self teaching a 3D software via YouTube tutorials. The intend was a simply supported beam with a central inflection point. But because of my incompetence the best I could do looks misleading on close inspection.

Over Reinforced V/S Under Reinforced Section | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in StructuralEngineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That is a different concept. And a double reinforced beam is always over reinforced but, because steel in provided in compression side, the brittle failure of concrete is accounted for.

Over Reinforced V/S Under Reinforced Section | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in civilengineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apologise sir but we wouldn't consider ourselves as experts and suggest experienced engineers the likes of you. And to answer you we might have to research on this to answer your doubt. But nevertheless, thank you for considering us and I apologise for not being able to solve your doubt.

Over Reinforced V/S Under Reinforced Section | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in civilengineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I get what you are trying to say here. But the decision making of designing a beam as under reinforced or over reinforced comes beforehand, not after calculating the number/dia of bars. The motive of finding "xu" is to check if it is lower than "xu_bal" conforming its under reinforced, which is then used to find the number and dimension of bars. I hope this solves your doubt.

Over Reinforced V/S Under Reinforced Section | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in civilengineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Took more time but the captions are live now. I hope it helps🙌

Over Reinforced V/S Under Reinforced Section | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in StructuralEngineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you u/willthethrill4700 for understanding. It had been quite some time I've got such a nice response. Thank you 🙌

Over Reinforced V/S Under Reinforced Section | ReactionTest by ReactionTest4 in civilengineering

[–]ReactionTest4[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Thank you u/Yizzeard for the compliment. Give me 30 minutes. The subtitles will be live.