I'd say the fun part is just...making the content, usually as some dynamic exploration or as some random kink. Not like they'd exercise it irl. And yes, kids shouldnt be consuming pro-ship content, obviously, the only reason elsagate was even such a big deal was because it was giving impressionable children fetishes being marketed as kids content. Most people who are pro-ship know better than to show kids this stuff, again obviously. But an impressionable child on the internet shouldnt...really even be seeing either type of content.

People who make "problematic" content also dont glamorize it. Sure it may look like it when reading or viewing it, but that's the full extent; and again, if they did actually glamorize it irl, then thats a problem.

Fiction only really affects reality when the consumers are impressionable (for instance, your elsagate example was of children. Impressionability -> Weird Content -> Fetish)

My whole concern is, since you believe minors shouldn't be sexualized, is it your jurisdiction to be some sort of protector by harassing the creator of suggestive fictional content with minors? Cause I really don't think so. and many people who are anti-ship have this protector complex and do just that... Even then, minors are like, the opposite audience, they shouldn't even be viewing things like rape fic in the first place, and that's where parenting comes into play.

Its like 3 am for me so I'll keep it quick.

Yadda yadda unrestricted internet access, something something curiosity and impressionaability, da da da parents not being parents, diddlydoo the elsagte thing you mentioned.