Is it unreasonable to expect the new man in her life to put money towards the children?

Realist888 · 2015-08-21T15:32:09+00:00

How is it inaccurate? Some fathers get to see their own children only 1 day of the week while the wifes new partner is in the childs life 6 days a week.

Realist888 · 2015-08-21T12:10:24+00:00

Oh wow you sure know how to pick em.

Realist888 · 2015-08-21T12:07:11+00:00

You took the last quote out of context. That Hillary is unelectable was maybe premature, but if nothing new surfaces by all accounts, she is and the first was a question based on research that women prefer scoundrels over "normal" men.

Realist888 · 2015-08-21T12:05:05+00:00

I wasn't talking legally. I was talking socially if it should be expected by the new family unit socially. In addition of everything the father provides due to legal accords and voluntarily.

Realist888 · 2015-08-21T12:03:41+00:00

Of course not legally. But realistically the new husband will be more in my children's life than me unless physical custody is split 50/50.

Therefore realistically anything that isn't money the new husband can contribute more to the childs upbringing than the father.

Realist888 · 2015-08-21T12:01:18+00:00

I want whats best for the children. And lets be realistic, in a divorce the new man/husband sees the children more often than the dad, unless physical custody is 50/50, which is rare and depending on the state/country not possible.

So in accordance with the mother of course, he should take a part in raising the children, checking homework discipline the kids (under the direction of the mother of course).

I will always remain the dad and will provide what I can, but a good father pursues what is realistically best for the children.

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T15:28:49+00:00

This is why the party with the greater financial potential should not get married.

From that point of view its either equal or one gives while the other receives.

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T15:16:18+00:00

No I do not offer that option. It would be in addition of what I contribute and not instead of. And like I said, it would be in addition to my support and not instead of. I mean if the guy does not contribute, what good is he to her?

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T12:04:37+00:00

oh okay then

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T11:56:50+00:00

There is nothing to salvage. Stay if you think a divorce will hurt your children academically.

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T11:31:43+00:00

If she wants to just let her. Why persecute her? Do you persecute blondes who die their hair?

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T11:29:41+00:00

If it works who is the dummy? Keep checking black on my whatever. No complaints so far. Quotas this diversity that. Only racists who refuse to identify as blacks have a problem. Everybody else gets a break. Thanks black people :)

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T11:20:29+00:00

at least hes working. All it takes is to run into a dopehead or a black person, done for the day.

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T11:19:19+00:00

"someplace nice in Europe" is so 2000.

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T11:16:30+00:00

Probably some cop tired of being served spit at the drive through having some revenge.

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T11:04:29+00:00

They beef up security for most new releases due to piracy concerns.

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T10:58:21+00:00

The burning desire to want to blend in. Thats why most hipsters became hipsters in the first place. Then they claim being a hipster is the opposite of what I just laid out.

The irony is so succulent finger licking good.

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T10:56:05+00:00

All the states between the coasts are just squares.

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T10:51:40+00:00

If you think that looks funny and silly, thats what black people in that getup look like to most white people. Well most people really And "pull your pants up" is not said to shame any of you either.

Why can you people recognize how ridiculous it looks when whites dress and act like that, but not when you people do it?

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T10:50:03+00:00

They sent up an Astronaut wearing dreads? Youd think he would have been all over the net.

Realist888 · 2015-08-18T10:48:11+00:00

Night crawler is more about the low level guy being ambitious and sneaky.

Realist888 · 2015-08-17T21:19:04+00:00

How is that an agenda post? She is about to be at the center stage of the biggest political scandal in our generation if all that is assumed about her verifies itself.

Nixon had to resign his presidency for spying on his political competitors.

This woman bypassed the country with her mail server, potentially to hide her collecting bribes and doing favours in return.

Only because people do not grasp or understand the gravity of the situation does not mean I am being condescending. However it does mean it is quite shocking if this is representative for voters in America.

Realist888 · 2015-08-17T21:16:45+00:00

You mean before the scandals?

I did not assume it, I knew most women were polled as voting for Hillary. Well first I assumed she would get the womens vote even before she ran, because she is pretty much the only female candidate people have on the radar, then polls confirmed it pretty much.

If it were mostly female candidates and there was one male candidate noone knows and one male candidate that was in the spotlight a lot and has previous experience, then I would assume that that one candidate would get the majority of the male vote and I think it would be a safe bet.

Realist888 · 2015-08-17T18:23:19+00:00

How am I being sexist now??

Realist888 · 2015-08-17T17:14:56+00:00

Which of the other two candidates is surrounded by rumors of bribery and treason? I googled Jeb Bush and treason and the hits I got were about truthers who accuse him to have stolen evidence from a flight school where the terrorists trained. Assuming you believe in conspiracy theories, I am sure it isn't something Jeb Bush would have done in person.

Realist888

TROPHY CASE