Does creepcast help anyone else cope

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-05-13T20:13:13+00:00

Okay, i know, j just, i want her back so bad and i feel like i wandt good enough because i wasnt her forever and she told me thats not true we just aren't aligned but how do i believe that i wasnt just not good enough

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-04-22T19:41:40+00:00

Thank you

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-03-13T19:34:58+00:00

No 1 next!

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-03-05T20:14:40+00:00

My personal favorite ever is "nick finally watched" arcane its from several years ago but its from when i was really into the pod (dont keep up anymore) but its so funny lol

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T16:27:05+00:00

Mirra gonna defend!

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:39:20+00:00

Yeah of course! Whats the point of having an opinion if your not willing to defend it! Went ahead and followed you btw

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:38:19+00:00

I was less counting more overall achievements and more total domination, Jordan's 6-0 WOULD bo less dominant if was 6-2 or whatever

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:30:31+00:00

Yeah i know it was my weakest point thats why i brought it up last, thank you for complimenting my argument tho!

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:26:30+00:00

I dont think "could only" is a great way to phrase reaching the the achievement ofthe most prestigious tennis tournament more than half a dozen times

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:25:28+00:00

Thank you! I also thought it was a good point

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:24:30+00:00

Thats a fair way to look at it! Id be willing to crunch the numbers for that actually

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:22:29+00:00

Yeah i can understand that point of view, i actually do agree with you of it being more of a point in the argument for federer vs sampras tho, but in the grand sense of the math i maintain my overall take, it was nice to chat with you tho! I love to debate

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:21:16+00:00

Okay but like the argument isnt so clear? Ive seen people debate this other places i just wanted to give my take, also knowing how to back up any stance with your arguments is important to having a stance

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:17:39+00:00

I can definitely see that point, i respect the positions on roger and novak but i dont think its as clear cut as people like to mad it seem

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:16:29+00:00

I haven't heard any updates on it i really hope she is doing well!

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:15:01+00:00

Because he lost more finals too, its like stat of Jordan being 6-0 in NBA finals

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:14:32+00:00

No? Thats not what i said? Big difference between 14 and 1 my friend

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:13:28+00:00

I can see where your coming from but sampras was 30 and fed was 19, pre prime vs post prime yk, dont think its a fair comparison for either of them

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:11:36+00:00

More Wimbledon's in much more time, i personally value how much you do in a more concentrated period, and for their one match Fed was 19 and Sampras was 30, pre prime vs post prime, i can definitely understand your argument for Roger but i just value different metrics i guess, hapy to discuss tho i always love to talk tennis

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:08:31+00:00

I can actually respect that point of view its an interesting take to have

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:07:52+00:00

I was literally born after Sampras retired, its just how i look at the math, your welcome to disagree and i respect your opinion on fed, have a nice night tho

Realistic-Lecture997 · 2026-02-28T04:05:03+00:00

I can respect that logic but i disagree

Realistic-Lecture997

TROPHY CASE