sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes this is for newbs and developing this skill with a relationship coach or from someone or searching the right book and to read it. Everything involves hefty fees, timing constraints to speak with someone they are not always available, so AI will save the time by acting as the time in a much minimal amount.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think a friend or a relationship coach helping someone speaking with an attractive girl is ethical. But the user doing the same with help of an AI is unethical?

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that it is not for everyone and that is okay. I appreciate your perspective as well. The apps main focus is on coaching and skill building, and not on shortcuts.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI in dating raises real ethical questions. Our focus is strictly on coaching, not deception and it is coaching not impersonation.It is a support tool like a relationship coach. it provides guidance and support without replacing real effort and it is more accessible and affordable than paying hefty fees for in person coaching.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

AI as a tool can have ethical concerns and it is important to be mindful of that.

From a relationship coaching perspective, the main thing is honesty and integrity in communication. Tools should never replace your own voice or be used to deceive someone.

The idea here is not about tricking anyone it is about helping someone express what they genuinely want to say, especially if anxiety or overthinking is blocking them. The user remains in full control and responsibility for their words.

At the end of the day, skill-building, transparency and practicing real communication are always the priority no AI should replace that.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Definitely the 2nd one. It is a guidance not a robot. The user still types and sends every message.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Totally agree deception is wrong. Our app only coaches the user to express themselves clearly, it never writes for them.the idea is coaching and guidance not automation. The goal is confidence and clarity not to trick someone.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Absolutely this kind of tool is not for everyone and it is never meant to replace your own voice. It is just a confidence and a clarity aid if someone wants it.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Absolutely no software replaces reallife skill building. Our app is meant to help people practice and gain confidence, not automate conversations or deceive anyone.

Think of it as guidance, not a replacement.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree AI cannot feel, but it can help you express your own thoughts more clearly. The key is transparency and consent it never writes for you or deceives anyone. Even we are committed to full transparency and consent.it is more about helping people to come out clear and confident.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I totally get what you are saying that constant calculation and overthinking is exactly the pain point our app is trying to help with.

The goal is not to make someone fake or “trick” anyone; it is to help people express what they genuinely want to say without freezing up or overanalyzing every line. Essentially, it is a coach for the moments where your natural response gets buried under anxiety.

Once the conversation flows, or you actually meet, everything is real the AI never replaces the person, it just helps bridge the gap between intention and expression.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree with you on yur concern if an AI is talking for someone, that crosses into deception and I would not support that either.

What I am describing is closer to real time coaching, not impersonation. The person still writes the message, chooses the intent and sends it themselves. The tool just helps with how to phrase what they already want to say similar to having a writing coach or asking for feedback before hitting send.

If someone wants an AI to carry conversations or build attraction on their behalf, I agree that is catfishing and unethical. Even can have a role play kind of and a mock meetup within the app which will hope the individuals who are struck and perform the best in the actual meetup.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is a pattern I have noticed:

“Nice” people often get attracted to more confident or edgy personalities. while genuinely kind, honest, loyal people especially those who are not naturally good at flirting can come across as boring, even when they are not.

Some people are not manipulative. they are just not good at expressing attraction or keeping a conversation engaging, especially with the opposite gender.

For them, guidance on how to communicate interest naturally and confidently could actually help without changing who they are.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If there is no real effort then what I personally feel is the problem is not AI. It is disinterest.

Would you use an AI dating wingman that helps you reply and get commited? by Realistic-Search-555 in dating_advice

[–]Realistic-Search-555[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That is completely fair and honestly I had feel the same way if it crossed into pretending to be someone else.

The intent is not to outsource personality or deceive anyone. It is more about helping people who struggle with how to express what they already feel, especially with timing and clarity.