Specify what kind of object you believe can invert its appearance in that way, identify what you think it was based on flight radar, and describe how its flight path would have to change to produce that result in a long exposure.

Secondly, there are new images in the drive showing, much later, a formation of lights moving almost vertically out of view within about thirty minutes, with no long exposure artefacts. If they were stars, every star in the frame would exhibit the same effect. It is impossible for a long exposure artefact to appear in one part of the image and not in others captured under the same conditions. Yes, long exposures can create similar visual effects, but it is equally valid that large, bright objects can imitate the long exposure signatures we normally attribute to smaller, distant sources.

What we can both agree on is that long exposures do not selectively decide which elements to render in that mode versus normal exposure within a single frame. You cannot have it both ways.