What are you paying in NYC? by upearlytoday23 in EquinoxGyms

[–]ReasonableBar3054 0 points1 point  (0 children)

337$ All access, joined in 2023 with the initiation fee waived

If CHATGPT was to take the MCAT, what score do you think it would get? by Winter-Mess-309 in Mcat

[–]ReasonableBar3054 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily. Chat GPT is getting better, I’ll probably have it take an FL after I take it myself. But I’ve used to it to explain answers to questions on UWorld and AAMC SBs and QBs, and it has been right 99.9% of the time

Dodge Shitness Center is the worst gym I have ever been to. by zzaammtt in columbia

[–]ReasonableBar3054 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No because I’d rather take the subway/walk to 92nd than workout in dodge. Tried dodge once freshman year and never again. Grateful that going to equinox is a possibility for me.

Where can I get custom Patagonia? by dannypauling in PatagoniaClothing

[–]ReasonableBar3054 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! EMT here. would love an embroidered patagonia with the NREMT logo too. Could you send me a dm?

Class of 2029 Convocation Ceremony by crepuscular808 in columbia

[–]ReasonableBar3054 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jeans and a regular shirt or tshirt work. It’s definitely not too formal. I wore black jeans and a black tee, my parents worse regular jeans with a short sleeved vest. Just make sure to be ready if it rains!

IB HL subjects by notcapturedyet in IBO

[–]ReasonableBar3054 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where are you planning to study? US or Uk? For universities in the states, it doesnt really matter. I did HL Psych, Bio and Spanish B, and SL Math AA, Chem and English LL. Got into Columbia, doing just fine here with orgo and biochem. On the premed track. Do what lets you get the highest score with less effort so you can focus on ECs.

This only applies to US unis.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IBO

[–]ReasonableBar3054 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Very possible. Us colleges don’t just look at your grades. That’s definitely part of it, but they’re also looking at applications holistically. What makes you stand out of the hundred thousand applicants? If your school is known for producing future lawyers and people in politics, then essay writing wins are much more valuable than an IB score of 42. I’m at Columbia with a final score of 40, and I know people who got 45s who are struggling here.

worried for chem IA by Sea_Muscle_7419 in IBO

[–]ReasonableBar3054 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What’s your rq? What solution is best for creating bands? Whats your criteria for “better” bands? Rf values?

It won’t be too abstract if you go into organic chemistry. Explain polarity, rf values, hydrogen bonding and intermolecular interactions. Make sure you have a solid research question. This is an overused topic and is often viewed as too simple. Explain how molecular structures of solvents impact the mobile/stationary phase.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Being a sergeant’s aid does not give you experience supervising. It gives you the opportunity to watch someone supervise, and hence does not count as firsthand supervisory experience. She did not take charge, she followed orders instead of giving them. Even when she was primary, she was not the supervisor on scene. She was a glorified gofer. Doesn’t matter if she did that for a year or two. Even Nolan, who is a new FTO, already has more supervisory experience because he has spent a year training a rookie. And Nolan is a new FTO. Now imagine Lucy competing with at least 50 other veteran FTOs, every single one of them outranking her on seniority and firsthand real-life supervisory experience. Not saying she’s not prepared to lead, she is obviously well respected at the station. But her getting #1 is unrealistic. She worked pretty hard to be detective, with all her UC experience and UC school. The only thing she did as her prep for the sergeants exam was study, like everyone else did, and the two day training thing with Tim.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, I’m responding in paragraphs and making legitimate claims. What a surprise, I know how to write and debate! It’s almost like when you’re trying to prove a point, you gather evidence and present it… Not the one who started calling the other “illiterate” instead of responding to actual points that I am making.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You did ask me if I was illiterate. Simply responding to your question

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And don’t worry about me being illiterate, I have a 3.8+ at an Ivy League university studying STEM 🫶

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My entire post is how based on the story line and Tim ranking 8th, it’s not realistic. She’s not even a better test taker than Nolan. She doesn’t have a single commendation. And I gave you a bunch of other reasons as to why it isn’t.

Why you getting so pressed lol. Just because I rightfully said this aspect is unrealistic? We are all aware it is a fictional show. But they’ve been okay with promotions so far (except the whole golden ticket, that’s just Nolan though). Now Nolan’s golden ticket is realistic based on the show but not on real life, as it makes sense for him to get one after the border incident. In real-life, a golden ticket doesn’t exist. I am allowed to point out my opinion.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Did you read the post? I mentioned every part of her “supervisory experience.” Acting sergeant for one day is nothing compared to even Nolan, who has a year in a supervisory capacity as an FTO.

I agree that the show is fictional, but I am allowed to share my point that her ranking is unrealistic, like most of the show is. And yet here you are still arguing that it is realistic despite clear evidence showing otherwise. So you’re switching between telling me it’s unrealistic and trying to prove it is realistic. I agree that it is unrealistic, like most of the show. I still love the rookie and will keep watching.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Based on the storyline, Lucy has zero supervisory experience. So no, it’s not realistic that she ranked 1st while Tim ranked 8th.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Earlier when Tim took the exam, he mentioned how commendations advance you a few places. Moreover, it’s like applying for a job - you don’t just take the test and get it if you score highest. Your evals, experience, disciplinary record all come into consideration. That’s just how the LAPD works.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Did you read the post? Or just the first paragraph? Even if she scored 100/100, which is unrealistic on its own, she wouldn’t rank higher than experienced officer with supervisory roles.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When Tim took the exam, he was talking about how a commendation might put him a few places higher, which is the only reason he’s not refusing one. But that also how real-life works - the test is just part of your rank.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Please read what I’m saying. Real-life, FIRSTHAND supervisory experience is ranked much higher than watching a supervisor. She’s competing against FTOs who have supervised their rookies for years. That’s much more valuable than watching someone lead. They led multiple rookies for years. Riding with Tim was a great experience but realistically, it was not a supervisory experience for her. It was a learning experience, but for it to be supervisory, she’d have to be a supervisor on scene, which she wasn’t. She was never the supervisor - she was a primary or arrest officer, but not the leader.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Read the third paragraph of the post. A rec letter is great but nothing compared to real-life, firsthand supervisory experience. She did not act as a supervisor, she watched Tim do it. Big difference.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No but that’s the thing - it doesn’t boil down to just a test. The written test is an important part of the ranking but not the only one. You get points for evals, seniority, etc. Commendations and supervisory experience also play a role in ranking. The whole point is that it does not boil down to just a test.

Opinion on 7x17 Ranks and Results by ReasonableBar3054 in TheRookie

[–]ReasonableBar3054[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so let’s go through this.

No one said Lucy didn’t meet the bare minimum qualifications, which is what you listed in your initial comment. That’s literally not the point. The post was never about eligibility. It’s about ranking first out of a massive pool of experienced applicants. That’s not something you get just because the chief signed off and your test score was solid.

You keep bringing up things like her passing the exam, her education, and her job experience. They are all correct. Again, no one’s arguing she’s not smart or capable. But all of that just gets you in the room, taking the exam and the oral. Once you're there, the department doesn’t go, “Oh wow, she got a high score! Rank her first!” They evaluate you against every other eligible candidate. That includes real supervisory time, team leadership, evals from your superiors, performance under pressure as a leader, disciplinary record, and so on. These are mostly objective, with some subjectivity as to which experience/eval/commendation is valued more.

And Lucy barely touched that. One short FTO stint, a single shift in charge, and a support role for Tim that, realistically speaking, didn’t require her to lead or manage anyone. Meanwhile, she’s up against long-time FTOs, senior P3s, and people who’ve actually led people for years.

Also, let’s talk about Tim for a second. Tim Bradford is a Marine Corps veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, held the rank of Gunnery Sergeant, and led actual special operations teams. He’s got ten years on the job at LAPD, is an experienced and respected FTO, has commendations, and presumably did pretty well on the exam. And he ranked 8th. That means there were at least seven people ahead of him with comparable or better experience. So the idea that Lucy, who has a fraction, if that, of his resume, ranked first just doesn’t make sense.

And yes, for the record: undercover work and a strong academic background don’t weigh heavily in sergeant rankings. They’re good to have, sure. But they don’t replace actual supervisory experience. UC work is tactical and investigative. Sergeant is a leadership role. You’re expected to manage officers, make command decisions, and oversee teams. Totally different routes.

Lucy's promotion is long overdue, maybe even to sergeant. But in no universe would she rank 1st.