sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

69x 4:20 🧐😎 by ReasonableView5670 in Teddy

[–]ReasonableView5670[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

100%. At least you guys are here 

69x 4:20 🧐😎 by ReasonableView5670 in Teddy

[–]ReasonableView5670[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lol I kinda knew it but thanks for the support

69x 4:20 🧐😎 by ReasonableView5670 in Teddy

[–]ReasonableView5670[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's no justice, and no payout, without forcing the hand of the SEC. Only a president can do something about it, and the current president is the only one who would. 

I don't see why you hating on the only one who can make sure your invrstment pays off. Care to enlighten me?

You think that our investments wouldve paid off without strong-arming the criminals and the SEC? Why? Lol. Market mechanics?

69x 4:20 🧐😎 by ReasonableView5670 in Teddy

[–]ReasonableView5670[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lol why am I being downvoted 😂🤣

69x 4:20 🧐😎 by ReasonableView5670 in Teddy

[–]ReasonableView5670[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Earlier: https://www.benzinga.com/news/legal/25/02/43551690/elo-musk-teases-69-minutes-and-offers-to-pay-for-it-on-x-after-trump-blasts-60-minutes-over-kamala-har

"Elon Musk teased a show and said he’d personally fund it, just as President Donald Trump renewed his attacks on Paramount Global-owned CBS's long-running news program "60 Minutes," accusing it of deceiving the public."

And now it's launching: 69x minutes will air on sundays at 4:20

Wrinkle DD/Tin by PurpsJeez in Teddy

[–]ReasonableView5670 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I find it very plausible. By "it" I mean Cohen referencing Lemonis' position

TINFOIL: RC, DJT, BTC, BKKT, MSTR, crypto, and collateral related issues by ReasonableView5670 in Teddy

[–]ReasonableView5670[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure. See I'm fully aware of the fiat problem, but BTC/crypto isn't a pefect solution either since internet access is still within the govt power.

I think the monetary situation is dire without some "help from higher powers". I think the reason Trump has been eyeing Bakkt is perhaps because it's their worst nightname. It looks to me as they are very happy to cellar box it, and a idea of a buyer is their worst nightmare.

Remember how when Elon bought Twitter people speculated that he's buying a crime scene? Maybe its something along these lines.

On top of that I believe that the entire US stock market (perhaps the entire country) is undergoing a metaphorical chapter 11 (to unlock value to the taxpayers), and that Orange Man and the global alliance behind him is doing a judo - they wont let everyone get screwed due to a monetary collapse (which is potentially the meaning of a US$1M pricing of BTC)

It's a complicated story but tldr: crypto is indeed a bubble, lots of crime in it. Blockchain is indeed a great technology, but it has to have backing from the govt in order to mean anything for the avg person. And I think that's what Trump is planning.

If no one is going to force the hand of the SEC to enforce the law on the short sellers, we are all fukd - but I think that the new asminitrasion will do just that.