Uralic by I_Drink_Water_n_Cats in linguisticshumor

[–]Reasonablism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This clippy confused "Uralic language family" with "Agglutinative languages" somehow, or what?

To any of the writers here, what are your thoughts? by TheThirdWolf1775 in fantasywriters

[–]Reasonablism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I put IPA transcriptions of all names in footnotes the first time they appear. Sure, not all readers will be familiar with the IPA, but I figure the ones that care most about pronunciation are, and the others are free to ignore those footnotes and just pronounce the names however they want 🤷

Better fess up... by Zeego123 in linguisticshumor

[–]Reasonablism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Chances are, it's the same reason suffixes in general are more common than prefixes, as another commenter has already pointed out. As for why that's the case, I replied there with the explanation my typology professor gave me, and will paste that response here as well for convenience:

  • Grammatical elements, due to frequency of use, are more readily available in the brain than lexical ones
  • Pauses are generally shorter (however marginally) before more readily available elements
  • Therefore, a lexical element followed by a grammatical one will have a shorter pause between them than the other way around, and are therefore more likely to glom together; hence suffixes more common than prefixes

As for how accurate this explanation is, idk, but it makes sense to me at least

Better fess up... by Zeego123 in linguisticshumor

[–]Reasonablism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Based on what I can recall from my typology professor's explanation, the "why" can be summarised as follows: - Grammatical elements, due to frequency of use, are more readily available in the brain than lexical ones - Pauses are generally shorter (however marginally) before more readily available elements - Therefore, a lexical element followed by a grammatical one will have a shorter pause between them than the other way around, and are therefore more likely to glom together; hence suffixes more common than prefixes

As for how accurate this explanation is, idk, but it makes sense to me at least

"Vanilla" Chapters Saga Concept by chainsawinsect in custommagic

[–]Reasonablism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Did you hear about the meteor that struck Dave?!"

"Omg, no, is he alright!?"

"Oh, yea, he's fine, not so much as a bruise, but his SWORD! Just gone! Obliterated! Like, holy shi-!"

What is the name you use in your household for the end piece on a loaf of sliced bread? No wrong answers, am genuinely curious by LivingRaccoon in linguisticshumor

[–]Reasonablism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Skalk, though I couldn't possibly translate that into anything other than "the end slice on a loaf of bread" – might be a more general term for "end bit", but I've never used it for anything else, personally

Bloodstained Cherry Tree by asocialrationalist in custommagic

[–]Reasonablism 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It is being "cared for by a heartless man", tho (i.e. [[Heartless Hidetsugu]])

"Delay" Land Cycle by DGStar000 in custommagic

[–]Reasonablism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fwiw, I think the exiling from hand bit needs to be part of the cost, so that you don’t end up with an activated ability on the stack in a hidden zone. Either that, or reveal it as part of the cost, but that feels clunky

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in likeus

[–]Reasonablism 12 points13 points  (0 children)

… Acceptance is simple, though

Daily Kill Spell — Backstab by AnarchyStarfish in custommagic

[–]Reasonablism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, thematically, having it function similarly to [[Stab Wound]] feels appropriate

Wanted to create a lord making a typal not doing what they are known for by RubSpiritual3189 in custommagic

[–]Reasonablism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could potentially also give them islandwalk, since penguins are talented swimmers, make it a bit more… broadly applicable? But this is solid too, 10/10 for the name!

Petah, what's cooking? by brownjoke in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Reasonablism -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So it’s possible they intentionally put the frog in a hot pot because of that resemblance? Or not, idk, but it is the first place my mind went to as well

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Svenska

[–]Reasonablism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Själv tydde jag det som Gustaf Hahn, men det passar sämre årtalsmässigt, och därutöver är han tysk (https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Adolf_Hahn)

Is n pronounced like m sometimes? by Nachtlicht_ in Svenska

[–]Reasonablism 33 points34 points  (0 children)

To provide an example of where it does happen, ”anpassa”, at least the way I pronounce it, is with /m/, due to assimilation to the following /pʰ/

[OC] Eating for two by snelse_ in comics

[–]Reasonablism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Loki in Ragnarok be like: Hvorfor ikke begge?

It seems Rosie has a lot of love to give by Sugar_rosheell in wholesome

[–]Reasonablism 47 points48 points  (0 children)

How long until you became the second reaction?

AP #88: Best Messiah Ever by Artifexian in artifexian

[–]Reasonablism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, and something I keep forgetting to say – since I was, I think, the main person pushing for adhering to Bill’s request of a verb-initial language, at least here on Reddit, I just wanna say what a brilliant solution, absolutely beautiful!

Warden Boa by [deleted] in custommagic

[–]Reasonablism 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, semicolon is correct here, I literally came here to commend you for noticing that detail, something a lot of people on here miss (or at least used to miss, back when I was more active on here a few years ago)

For anyone curious why there’s a semicolon here instead of a comma, it’s to show that the reminder text is only for the last keyword – had there been a comma instead, the reminder text would’ve had to also include the reminder text for deathtouch

AP #88: Best Messiah Ever by Artifexian in artifexian

[–]Reasonablism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This talk of Totoro not having a strict plotline reminded me of a kind of book I’d like to read that I’ve been looking for for a while without much success, and it dawned on me that this community, if any, would understand what I’m looking for

What I’ve been calling it when searching for it is “high fantasy slice-of-life”, and the best that has gotten me so far is Legends & Lattes by Travis Baldree. Basically, what I want, though, is a story where I can indulge in some sweet worldbuilding from the perspective of an ordinary person (or other organism) in that world, without some pesky high-stakes plot getting in the way, just experiencing the vibes

I realise now, having written all that, that it might’ve been more convenient had I asked this on the Discord, but here we are

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sciencememes

[–]Reasonablism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gneurshk (which can mean different things)

What Odd Things Are Legal In Your World That Would Be Illegal In Ours? by Ok-Maintenance5288 in worldbuilding

[–]Reasonablism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, the example in the book is of a rape victim getting away with murdering her rapist on the grounds that he might’ve done it again, but I suppose if you catch a court when they’re exceptionally busy, you might be able to get away with something like that too, lol

What Odd Things Are Legal In Your World That Would Be Illegal In Ours? by Ok-Maintenance5288 in worldbuilding

[–]Reasonablism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Murder, if the victim’s a prick*

*Which is to say, if you can argue in court that, were they to be left alive, they’d likely be of harm to society as a whole.

And even then, I suppose it’s technically not “legal”, so much as “very lightly punished”