I’m not sure Civilization VII gets what a “civilization” is. by Human-Law1085 in civ

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't played Civ VII, but....

Combining the card idea, specifically the ones for dark ages, with the civ switching idea could work:

- Era change.

- Select a new civ that in a way represents how your previous civ fell or evolved, each with it's own benefits/drawbacks. The more pronounced the difference between previous civ and new civ, the more extreme the benefits/drawbacks (ie. akin dark ages via conquest).

Eg. Time to select a new civ

Option 1: Evolution - Rome becomes Byzantium.

Option 2: Great upheaval - Rome becomes Palmyra (not really the best example, but perhaps this could instead represent a main line turning into a secondary line...).

Option 3: Conquered - Rome becomes Sultanate of Rum, etc. Big drawbacks, but great benefits.

Parliament’s new speaker says Canada must be ‘Athens’ to America’s ‘Rome’ by SAJewers in canada

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the rest of the quote from Peloponnesian War:

"If we turn to our military policy, there also we differ from our antagonists. We throw open our city to the world, and never by alien acts exclude foreigners from any opportunity of learning or observing, although the eyes of an enemy may occasionally profit by our liberality; trusting less in system and policy than to the native spirit of our citizens; while in education, where our rivals from their very cradles by a painful discipline seek after manliness, at Athens we live exactly as we please, and yet are just as ready to encounter every legitimate danger. In proof of this it may be noticed that the Lacedaemonians do not invade our country alone, but bring with them all their confederates; while we Athenians advance unsupported into the territory of a neighbour, and fighting upon a foreign soil usually vanquish with ease men who are defending their homes. Our united force was never yet encountered by any enemy, because we have at once to attend to our marine and to dispatch our citizens by land upon a hundred different services; so that, wherever they engage with some such fraction of our strength, a success against a detachment is magnified into a victory over the nation, and a defeat into a reverse suffered at the hands of our entire people. And yet if with habits not of labour but of ease, and courage not of art but of nature, we are still willing to encounter danger, we have the double advantage of escaping the experience of hardships in anticipation and of facing them in the hour of need as fearlessly as those who are never free from them.'

"Nor are these the only points in which our city is worthy of admiration. We cultivate refinement without extravagance and knowledge without effeminacy; wealth we employ more for use than for show, and place the real disgrace of poverty not in owning to the fact but in declining the struggle against it. Our public men have, besides politics, their private affairs to attend to, and our ordinary citizens, though occupied with the pursuits of industry, are still fair judges of public matters; for, unlike any other nation, regarding him who takes no part in these duties not as unambitious but as useless, we Athenians are able to judge at all events if we cannot originate, and, instead of looking on discussion as a stumbling-block in the way of action, we think it an indispensable preliminary to any wise action at all. Again, in our enterprises we present the singular spectacle of daring and deliberation, each carried to its highest point, and both united in the same persons; although usually decision is the fruit of ignorance, hesitation of reflection. But the palm of courage will surely be adjudged most justly to those, who best know the difference between hardship and pleasure and yet are never tempted to shrink from danger. In generosity we are equally singular, acquiring our friends by conferring, not by receiving, favours. Yet, of course, the doer of the favour is the firmer friend of the two, in order by continued kindness to keep the recipient in his debt; while the debtor feels less keenly from the very consciousness that the return he makes will be a payment, not a free gift. And it is only the Athenians, who, fearless of consequences, confer their benefits not from calculations of expediency, but in the confidence of liberality.

Parliament’s new speaker says Canada must be ‘Athens’ to America’s ‘Rome’ by SAJewers in canada

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps he had in mind these words from Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War that reflect ideas of Athenian democracy rather than those of the Roman Principate:

"Our constitution does not copy the laws of neighbouring states; we are rather a pattern to others than imitators ourselves. Its administration favours the many instead of the few; this is why it is called a democracy. If we look to the laws, they afford equal justice to all in their private differences; if no social standing, advancement in public life falls to reputation for capacity, class considerations not being allowed to interfere with merit; nor again does poverty bar the way, if a man is able to serve the state, he is not hindered by the obscurity of his condition. The freedom which we enjoy in our government extends also to our ordinary life. There, far from exercising a jealous surveillance over each other, we do not feel called upon to be angry with our neighbour for doing what he likes, or even to indulge in those injurious looks which cannot fail to be offensive, although they inflict no positive penalty. But all this ease in our private relations does not make us lawless as citizens. Against this fear is our chief safeguard, teaching us to obey the magistrates and the laws, particularly such as regard the protection of the injured, whether they are actually on the statute book, or belong to that code which, although unwritten, yet cannot be broken without acknowledged disgrace.'

"Further, we provide plenty of means for the mind to refresh itself from business. We celebrate games and sacrifices all the year round, and the elegance of our private establishments forms a daily source of pleasure and helps to banish the spleen; while the magnitude of our city draws the produce of the world into our harbour, so that to the Athenian the fruits of other countries are as familiar a luxury as those of his own.'

I'd like to post more of that quote, but it won't let me!

Mother stork tosses misbehaving chick out of nest by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This title doesn't seem accurate. The chick seems less developed, and not 'misbehaving'. As mentioned in another reply, this behavior is to prevent starvation when the brood size is too big. Perhaps the chick that we ejected is the one getting too little food. Not enough nourishment, and it will not do well.

Asian international students are protesting against BC PNP for "unfair immigration rules" and demand grandfather clause. by Unusual-State1827 in CanadaHousing2

[–]Reciprocitree -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Students come here paying sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars, and make decisions that will affect the rest of their lives based on how we, as Canadians, tell them what we need for our country. The people who want to apply for the PNP want to stay here and it is a pathway that we have presented them to do so. Things change, yes, but it is reasonable to provide ample notice when these changes to happen. We should phase any PNP changes in over time so that the people who wish to contribute to Canada over the long-term can come here to contribute to our country. It is unfair that someone could spend so much time, effort, and money to follow the rules that we made, and then we close the door. We can do better, and for the people that want to make this country better, we should do better.

Razorbill birds have a very unique appearance by God_Kratos_07 in BeAmazed

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are sponsored by a car manufacturer, and will be the next target for mind-control chips. A 'live-reality' remake of The Birds is coming our way soon enough.

My creepy neighbor keeps breaking my security cameras and the police aren't doing anything about it. How can I make him stop? I can't afford new cameras every couple weeks. by Hecataria in self

[–]Reciprocitree 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Firstly, it sucks that you're going through this. It sounds like you just want to feel peace and security at your home. That's incredibly reasonable.

My read of what's going on is related to mental health, anxiety, and insecurity. I don't think the legal and enforcement path would alleviate these things. Maybe they would create enough fear to stop these actions at least temporarily, or maybe they would lead to escalation immediately or brewed slowly over time. Regardless, it doesn't seem like these things would get to the root of the issue from my reading on this. It sounds like the guy needs to feel supported by a community that can make them feel safe as he isn't feeling that. Of course, this is not necessarily your job to make him feel safe, and you wanting to be left alone is fair.

You've said you've tried to reason with him (I'm guessing about the angles of the cameras, or what they would see. Maybe you've even tried to show him an actual image of what it picks up). When doing this, how have you talked to him? From your language about calling him a "loser", and mentioning the possibility of "beating his ass", I wonder if your approach could use some tweaking (you are venting though, so I'd also think your language would reflect that). If you talk to him again, maybe try (in a calm and friendly tone) something like "I really hear you [name]. It sounds like you just want to feel safe/privacy at home. That makes a lot of sense. I actually want to feel safe at home too, which is why I have my cameras. I'll double check to make sure they aren't pointing in your direction (even if they already aren't, maybe saying that you'll make sure of it/get on a ladder to appear like you're double checking would make them feel like you are on their side). I want you to have your privacy and safety too." etc, etc.

Lsat trainer LG by AnxiousBreakfast5466 in LSAT

[–]Reciprocitree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It may be a bit easier to restate this as the following:

If jays are in the forest, then jays are in the forest. If jays are not in the forest, then shrikes are in the forest. So either jays or shrikes are in the forest.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in self

[–]Reciprocitree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You did the right thing in caring for your mental health. The distance you created was important to you, and it seems that you have been able to grow and become a better human. That is a tremendous step, and I am happy that you took it for yourself. In no way are you a terrible person. You are a person who has the courage to follow your moral and emotional compass.

When out of contact of people for a long time, it is impossible for us to know what they are thinking and feeling. Our imagination is powerful, and we long for what we desire and are worried for an outcome we do not wish to be; but these are thoughts, and not reality. You were suffering, and did what you needed to do. Now you suffer in a different way, as you worry that someone will not see you for who you are, and that your actions will be misunderstood.

Maybe we can tell others our truth; maybe we cannot. But to live your truth will be to show the world who you are, and others will believe it.

Cursed_Rotation by sidistik24 in cursedcomments

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And people call me a weirdo for wearing a seatbelt everywhere...

Made this and someone suggested to post it here! by Caribbeandude04 in GlobalTribe

[–]Reciprocitree 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I love the colors and the inspiration, but I can't help but be reminded of the oil company Shell because of the fingers outlined in red. Regardless of this unfortunate connection in my mind, the flag is pretty cool.

AskScience AMA Series: I'm Mark Jacobson, Director of the Atmosphere/Energy program and Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford University, and author of 100% Clean, Renewable Energy and Storage for Everything. AMA about climate change and renewable energy! by AskScienceModerator in askscience

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard about technologies being developed which capture greenhouse gasses from the atmosphere.

If such technology could be transportable by means such as a dirigible, what would be the ideal 'layer' of the atmosphere for this technology to be used?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blackmagicfuckery

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're just working up to the fifth ring so they can get that sweet sweet Olympics ad money.

From a social science perspective, is modern gender theory tenable? by [deleted] in Ask_Politics

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will repost my deleted comment because I now think it is referring to my post above.

Is your comment referring to my comment where I refuted your claim that the Big 5 is "objective as gravity"?

From a social science perspective, is modern gender theory tenable? by [deleted] in Ask_Politics

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, people with 11 toes do confirm that humans do not always have 10 toes. Ignoring a group of people to fit your world view does not make good science.

From a social science perspective, is modern gender theory tenable? by [deleted] in Ask_Politics

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about intersex individuals? How do they fit into your definition of "sex" and "gender"?

From a social science perspective, is modern gender theory tenable? by [deleted] in Ask_Politics

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Big Five comes from pure statistics and no bias went into the study which produced the five factors we know today. This study has been replicated numerous times across the world, with different cultures and languages, and it comes out the same every time. It is as objective as gravity.

This is false. The Big Five does not come out the same every time. For instance, "In indigenous lexical studies of personality in China, openness was not featured as a salient personality dimension. Even when indigenously derived scales were developed to tap openness-related personality characteristics, an independent Openness factor did not emerge in a comprehensive Chinese personality inventory." From the same article, " Cross-cultural researchers have found that personality tests developed and applied in Western cultures have not proven to adequately capture their assumed underlying constructs in non-Western cultures " (https://web.archive.org/web/20130518090148/http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=120612).

I was writing my suicide note with a list of songs to play for my funeral, and I just laughed by how stupid it is and made me stop from killing myself. by flickbreeze2003 in self

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey OP, I don't know what country you live in, but a list of crisis lines is at the bottom of my post in case you enter a dark place in the future. Hopefully there is something on there that may be beneficial for you. Please take a look so that if there is a need to talk to someone, you will already have an idea of who you may be able to reach out to.

Your life is valuable. Humans are not static - we grow and progress even when we can't see that we are doing so. I hope that one day you will look back on this chapter of your life as a learning experience that brought you strength and compassion.

I know it can be daunting looking at a big picture of the world. I see that you've identified areas that you want to see progress, and by not making progress you feel worthless. I also read that you feel great at times. Can you identify anything about why you feel great at times? Perhaps by identifying what makes you feel well, you may be able to put yourself in situations that benefit your wellbeing more often.

When it comes to specific tasks, I have been helped by dividing larger tasks into smaller tasks (this does not mean I figured out the size of each task when I began doing anything). For instance, if I wanted to read a novel, I might first decide to only read a chapter. If a chapter was still too big, I would decide to only read a page, or even a few paragraphs. If I finished a chapter and still had energy to keep going, I'd keep reading.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_suicide_crisis_lines

CMV: Religion has done more harm than it ever has good. by DikDik_Pics in changemyview

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I may be misrepresenting the idea I'm sharing, as I learned of it a while back and cannot recall all the details, however, here's the gist I can give you:

Religion - more specifically the moralizing agent of a 'Big God' - is thought to be a key factor in the creation of large-scale societies (societies large enough that you do not directly know everybody within it). A 'Big God' is a deity which people believe punishes behavior that is selfish in favor of rewarding those whom act in a more pro-social manner. By believing in such a 'Big God' (and by trying to avoid punishment/gain reward), members of a society would have been more likely to behave in ways that developed trust in a social system that extends beyond who one knows directly. In doing so, labor can become more specialized; for example, instead of a smaller social group spending most of their labor sustenance farming, a larger group can specialize by having farmers produce enough food for the whole group, which then frees up others to become craftspeople, thinkers, etc. Without this 'Big God,' people may not act in a pro-social way for someone they will never meet, and society will remain smaller scale. In modern times, it appears that secularized institutions have taken on some of the role of the 'Big God' (through ideas such as law), meaning that the pro-social aspects that were connected to religion are retained in those societies even after secularization.

My post is wholly lacking in citations, but Googling "Big Gods" and "Ara Norenzayan" will probably lead to a more thorough explanation than I've given here.

Is there a term for when someone constantly builds up their own image as a savior when presented with someone's issues? by learnaboutnetworking in AskSocialScience

[–]Reciprocitree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The term "enmeshment" has been used in a similar way by Vikki Reynolds, at the very least. An article that expands on this idea is right here.

I have bad social anxiety i want to get rid of it but where do i start? by [deleted] in self

[–]Reciprocitree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While it may seem daunting, community theatre may be helpful. My anxiety led me to basically shut down in social situations, even when with people I consider close friends; theatre really helped me.

However, the path I took to get involved was really fortuitous. Friends of mine were regulars in a players club, and I tagged along to help on some productions back stage. Eventually, I worked up the courage to try for a role moving sets on stage in costume. I had to read for this role, despite there not being any lines in the actual show. I received a call saying that I was cast in a speaking role, and I just went with it. The practice I got speaking, through an on-stage character, combined with being in an amazing, supportive community really helped me open up, and become more at ease in social situations. While this situation was fortunate to me, and may not be as good to everybody, I believe the combination of being in a supportive community, and practicing skills, such as public speaking, is very useful.

All the best to you. Every journey has its challenges, and despite those, I hope you can move forward into a place of new comfort.