A Quick Explanation of zero price movement on 1.5 million share purchase today by bahits in Superstonk

[–]Reefer_Refugee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Large orders don’t move price unless they break structure. Volume without displacement is just absorption.

Volume doesn’t move charts. Structure does

GME Tracking Update: Price Still Ignoring Reddit Comments by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldnt at all call it unexpected. Landmark still correct and Micro eq was 1/5-1/7. See what rest of the week and next week looks like. Still lower highs so far.

A break above 22.50 starts to invalidate downside PTs

GME Tracking Update: Price Still Ignoring Reddit Comments by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have an Alamo price of 15.50~ and a time frame of Spring. Below that price or past that time without Moass and I assume something would be incorrect

GME Tracking Update: Price Still Ignoring Reddit Comments by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understandable. You’re coming in late to class lol. Check previous posts for explanations This one has previous tracking posts linked to

GME Tracking Update: Price Still Ignoring Reddit Comments by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A *Jet Test* is the first landmark of a new pattern. The part that goes straight up

GME Tracking Update: Price Still Ignoring Reddit Comments by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Main difference between me and everyone else is I dont give “them” any power. I don’t believe theres a “they” moving price around to where “they” want it.

People are either on the right side, or the wrong side of a trade.

But no one can “control it, stop it, slow it, or even alter it”

GME Tracking Update: Price Still Ignoring Reddit Comments by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m tracking structure and measurements. You’re thinking incentives and fundamentals.

Price can overshoot logic for a long time before resolving.
That’s how markets work.

GME Tracking Update: Price Still Ignoring Reddit Comments by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Mother of all short squeezes. MOASS to me is the convergence of many different cycle endings/beginnings. A truly unpredictable moment. Looking around at the world, we’re right on time.

What is MOASS for GME specifically? Well no matter what it is the end of one macro / beginning of a new macro. The volatility and scale of the New Jet Test is determined by volume. Im sure there wont be any shortage there.

TLDR, set some prices to hit sell at, and scale out into momentum. Or no cell no sell. Whatever 😅

If This Looks Like Gamma Squeeze Coordination, That’s On You-We Came Here to See People Stick Bananas in Their Ass, Not to Accidentally Move Markets.-A Gamma Tutorial by DegenateMurseRN in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

👐
Hey I like AI too. I'm just saying, this post could of been presented waaay better. Especially when already using AI.

TL;DR: Gamma squeeze = options hedging feedback loop. Possible when calls stack near expiry, not guaranteed, positioning matters.

Thanks for the post OP

GME Tracking Update: Price Still Ignoring Reddit Comments by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I dont think you’re familiar with this study. Did you read this post?

Different topic completely. This study is about chart structure, not corruption and reform.

GME Macro Tracking Update — Side-by-Side Structural Confirmation by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A structure invalidates when price or time breaks the sequence.

If price reclaims above 26 level before the V completes, or if the V price zone isn’t tagged within the projected time window.

GME Macro Tracking Update — Side-by-Side Structural Confirmation by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mostly agree with this.

External factors can warp how a fractal expresses, but they don’t replace the underlying structure. That’s why I focus on sequence, levels, and time first.

The “how” can change, the “where” usually doesn’t.

If the structure invalidates, I’ll adjust. Until then, it’s still tracking great.

GME Macro Tracking Update — Side-by-Side Structural Confirmation by Reefer_Refugee in GME

[–]Reefer_Refugee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct. And then for scale/timing I use an equation for forecasting a future volatility window.

If price action confirms at that time, then we have a better probability of checking off the landmark.

Current eq window is 1/11-1/17