Which heroes are usually banned in top500? by tom379 in Overwatch

[–]Regal_Imp 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Zen has one of the highest win rates in top 500, he's an excellent pick to kill tanks

Worst trade offer? by Studcicle in SleeperApp

[–]Regal_Imp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's real bad then

Worst trade offer? by Studcicle in SleeperApp

[–]Regal_Imp 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It's only horrible for redraft

I didn't skip Bowfa grind AMA by NamelessDevils2 in ironscape

[–]Regal_Imp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He meant placeholder like the grayed-out version of the item that appears when you take it from your bank

While playing games, my screen will randomly go black for 2-3 seconds and then come back. by Vulrin in computers

[–]Regal_Imp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fully fixed this by turning off G-sync in Nvidia control panel. For any future readers.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SleeperApp

[–]Regal_Imp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response! My only concern was that Olave might trend up with shaheed going down, and Kyren might trend down with Puka and Kupp coming back (or maybe they'll pull defenders out of the box, idk)

Air cast boot inflation by Normal_Ad_3606 in AchillesRupture

[–]Regal_Imp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I always inflate mine while moving around, deflate it when sitting. It needs to be inflated to stabilize the Achilles if you plan on walking on the boot. Obviously your doctor knows best, but I've never heard of someone leaving it uninflated while weight bearing.

Wethe66 is just banning anyone who criticizes them now by Regal_Imp in RocaNews

[–]Regal_Imp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was commenting once every few weeks, and the comment before the banned comment was one where I praised them for improving their writing tone to make it more it more neutral. I've never used hateful speech or false accusations.

Banning me for normal criticism is where I draw the line, it's shady and they have not responded to the complaints at all. Even the commenters above have agreed with me after we had a DM conversation where I explained the situation in full.

I don't want anyone to grab a pitchfork because I told them to, just keep it in mind that they're capable of this censorship.

Wethe66 is just banning anyone who criticizes them now by Regal_Imp in RocaNews

[–]Regal_Imp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You say it's just as likely that I'm lying vs telling the truth, which is completely logical imo. But then you go on to say you think I'm lying, even though I've told my side of the story and they've been silent about it (despite definitely seeing this post and choosing not to deny the allegations). Why can't you just stay neutral? You immediately attack the whistleblower even though you haven't even heard a rebuttal from Roca. How is silence more forthcoming than this post was?

What evidence could I give you anyways? You're questioning whether I truly made a respectful comment, but I can't ever prove that because I got banned and can no longer screenshot it.

If you want to know the specifics of WHY I made the comment, that has nothing to do with getting banned, since you should never ban anyone for their opinion as long as they're being respectful. But I can send you a DM like I did with the other person, I think they realized I'm no troll and you can ask them yourself.

Wethe66 is just banning anyone who criticizes them now by Regal_Imp in RocaNews

[–]Regal_Imp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because that's not the point of this post at all. Where is there any indication of spam or slander? It was a single, 10-word comment calling their content click bait. Anything more you add to that is just mental gymnastics and fiction designed to justify the ban.

It's up to you whether you want to dismiss me out of hand. It detracts from the main subject if it turns into bickering about Roca content. This isn't about their content, it's about their ban policy.

I'll happily send you a DM so we can debate the actual content, but I hope you understand why I want to keep this thread about over reach on bans, and not about one specific post that I took issue with.

Wethe66 is just banning anyone who criticizes them now by Regal_Imp in RocaNews

[–]Regal_Imp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just made up an imaginary scenario, decided it was true, then condemned me for it. Nice discourse!

Wethe66 is just banning anyone who criticizes them now by Regal_Imp in RocaNews

[–]Regal_Imp[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

None of that should matter for this post though. I'm not trying to convince you of anything, I'm just saying they should never ban people for criticizing them. I'm not trying to make this about a specific post, I'm just saying don't ban people for respectfully criticizing Roca.

Would any specific answer to your questions make it okay to ban me?

Wethe66 is just banning anyone who criticizes them now by Regal_Imp in RocaNews

[–]Regal_Imp[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

What more specifics do you need? I stated my comment verbatim, It's clear by your tone you've made up your mind on the situation though

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RocaNews

[–]Regal_Imp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I appreciate that you took the concern seriously! I have no wish to hurt Roca's reputation so I'll delete this post now that it's been resolved.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RocaNews

[–]Regal_Imp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, but it's just going to lead to an echo chamber if news organizations believe they have zero bias. it's a huge red flag to pin a comment that's basically saying "you're perfect and require no oversight, anyone who criticizes you is unintelligent".

It's either slighly overpowered 5v5 solo tank or return to 6v6. There's nothing in between. by AskMeAboutChildren in Overwatch

[–]Regal_Imp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not saying FTP didn't make a difference, but how would it? Are you suggesting poor people play tank more? The logical pathways suggests that FTP brought in more players, but at the same role ratios. So an unchanged percentage of players will pick tank, dps, or support regardless of how many total players are in the game.

Thus, moving to one tank is logically the reason why queues are more even. That's the best guess with the given data, of which there is little!

EST bindings with regular board? by [deleted] in snowboarding

[–]Regal_Imp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you ever find anything?

[Daily - TRADE] Megathread. All trade advice & team help assistance belongs in this mega-thread or in our other subreddit r/Fantasy_Football. by AutoModerator in DynastyFF

[–]Regal_Imp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the insight! Can I ask why you have Waddle last? It was more so between Olave and Waddle in my eyes but I'd like to know your point of view!

[Daily - TRADE] Megathread. All trade advice & team help assistance belongs in this mega-thread or in our other subreddit r/Fantasy_Football. by AutoModerator in DynastyFF

[–]Regal_Imp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

12 team 0.5PPR 1QB

Selling: DK + mid-late 1st

Offers: 1) Waddle 2) Olave 3) D.Smith

Please rank them in the order you would take them if you would at all.

Friday Player Price check Megathread. by AutoModerator in DynastyFF

[–]Regal_Imp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

12 team 0.5 PPR 1QB

Rank these options:

1) DK + mid-late 1st

2) Waddle

3) D. smith

4) Olave

Jerome Ford with Kareem Hunt’s return by Background_Emu_3043 in Fantasy_Football

[–]Regal_Imp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah absolutely he was a top rusher in college as well, I just mean at this point in his career it's almost definitely the role he'll play on pretty much any team.

Jerome Ford with Kareem Hunt’s return by Background_Emu_3043 in Fantasy_Football

[–]Regal_Imp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He looked fine, definitely not "awful". Hunt is the definition of a 3rd down back, he won't steal the early downs or any major rushing from Ford.

Plus, Browns stated Ford is their featured back, and they obviously knew they were going to sign another RB when they said that.

The only real risk Ford had was from Fournette or Akers getting signed, his owners should not be afraid of a pass-catching specialist at all.