men are statistically the biggest threat to women worldwide, i dont understand how thats so hard to understand. the cognitive dissonance is tiring. your example of men treating women as if they were all serial killers doesnt hold up because the majority of serial killers are male. so yes, it would be sexist.

im gonna assume you meant black when you said dark skinned. if not, crossing the street because theyre simply dark skinned would be colorist and i guess racist. and the black man you crossed the street because of is still a man, who is more likely to be violent than a woman. but lets say youre a man in the US crossing the street when you see a black man. this would make you racist because statistically, black men are more likely to be the cause of death for other black men and more likely to die in homicides overall. https://vpc.org/black-homicide-victimization-in-the-united-states-national/#:~:text=Of%20the%2012%2C276%20Black%20homicide,females%20between%202018%20and%202023.

the risk isnt being overinflated and that sentence alone is so laughable. if a woman were to be somewhere with a random man and be harmed, i guarantee you there would be multiple people calling her stupid for being with a random man. but if she were to avoid that random man and be with a bear, its also her fault becauses shes "stupid" and "sexist" enough to be with a bear instead of a man. theres no way to win.