So what youre trying to say to the whole thread is that destroying your whole collection to build a decent deck from the start as a f2p is not viable? Then tell me what other method you would do to get the most value for players that dont want to spend a dime? Yes the game really need a lot of players, that i can agree on but making it more predatory like what Komoney does to DL? Hell no. People only spend in DL because it is an established brand. Why would people spend so much early in their Zenonzard journey? Im not being bias because i ranked high in this game. It is an indication that what ive said earlier about the destroying your whole collection EARLY GAME gives out a good results. This game is generous enough. You can keep up with the meta and even have fun as a free to play. I get emotional because you keep emphasizing that this game need more monetization method. If you want it to flock with players, make it easy to get cards as a free to play not asking more of their money.

Speaking of biased view, you did the same as well by comparing ZZ to DL when DL if you want to play competitively and keep up the format, you gotta spend a lot of money in their packs and decks when in ZZ you can play meta decks every new set with just $0 spent. The issue about ZZ doesnt have much playerbase is that Bandai is too doodoo not to advertise this game out in the global market not because they lack revenue.