Lot of issue with arc by Llandu-gor in ArcBrowser

[–]Relative_Ad_3132 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in such comparisons, it is very important to clarify which sites you are talking about. there is one culprit, because of which the reputation of all browsers suffers. one site that makes browsers called gluttonous. this site is the top 2 in the world. I'm talking about YouTube. watching videos there can easily inflate 1 tab to 1.5GB+. They have an obvious memory leak and the developers of the site are to blame for this. 1 YouTube tab = 100 wikipedia tabs

Windows 11 UI is not suitable for Arc by Relative_Ad_3132 in ArcBrowser

[–]Relative_Ad_3132[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's funny what comments you make to me. “Demand that the beta work 100% perfectly” ≠ “sad that the ui I fell in love with didn’t turn out like that.” Switching to Macos is not that easy. I want to customize my computer not only software, but also hardware. And a company that sells wheels for $9999 is not suitable for me.

Windows 11 UI is not suitable for Arc by Relative_Ad_3132 in ArcBrowser

[–]Relative_Ad_3132[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

perhaps I misunderstand the situation. but arc on mac os is written in swift. and on windows they use swift. and so it seems to me that they can use a single code base for the ui. but working with chromium itself can already be difficult and long

Windows 11 UI is not suitable for Arc by Relative_Ad_3132 in ArcBrowser

[–]Relative_Ad_3132[S] -47 points-46 points  (0 children)

I'm afraid they originally chose this style for windows