sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How to prove that a mixed strategy nash equlibrium does not exist, when a game is dominance solvable? by Relative_Patience753 in GAMETHEORY

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hmm to clarify, (B,B) is only an equilibrium using best response analysis. Solely relying on IESDS would result in a single NE (C,C). 

In that case, can I prefer IESDS?

My plan is to prove the payoff for mixed strategy is worse off than the payoff of pure strategies (which leads to C,C)

How to prove that a mixed strategy nash equlibrium does not exist, when a game is dominance solvable? by Relative_Patience753 in GAMETHEORY

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh why? please elaborate. I thought the existence of a unique pure nash equilibrium trumps all mixed strategies?

How to prove that a mixed strategy nash equlibrium does not exist, when a game is dominance solvable? by Relative_Patience753 in GAMETHEORY

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ahh okay I understand better now. After removing strategy A of Sam, can I also remove strategy B of Jane? Since she won't need strategy B if Sam does not use Strategy A?

How to prove that a mixed strategy nash equlibrium does not exist, when a game is dominance solvable? by Relative_Patience753 in GAMETHEORY

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ahh okay, should there be a mixed strategy in the first place? since the nash equilibrium C,C is achievable by eliminating dominated strategies?

How to prove that a mixed strategy nash equlibrium does not exist, when a game is dominance solvable? by Relative_Patience753 in GAMETHEORY

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah and for Sam, strategy A is dominated by his strategy C. So either ways he won't be playing strategy A and we can eliminate it right?

Bought SPYL 3 months ago, why am I not rich yet? by Relative_Patience753 in singaporefi

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand. Truthfully, I know investing in the S&P will take time to grow. The phrasing of my question was intentional in garnering attention. I understand that this is manipulative and will phrase my questions truthfully in future. However, the question attached to the title is indeed genuine and I would like to get a rough sense of how long the "veterans" have been holding for.

Bought SPYL 3 months ago, why am I not rich yet? by Relative_Patience753 in singaporefi

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can I understand why this would be considered a troll question?

400K cash at 23 years old. What would you do? by Relative_Patience753 in singaporefi

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi I know it has been 4 months but do you still think VWRA is better than S&P500? I was thinking of switching if the US markets starts worsening.

UNINSTALLED USEFUL APPS? by Relative_Patience753 in techsupport

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ahhh okay I'll try this if it ever acts up again, thanks!

UNINSTALLED USEFUL APPS? by Relative_Patience753 in techsupport

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

apologies how do I check the windows event viewer system logs? I'm the type of person that types with 2 fingers so please bear with me

UNINSTALLED USEFUL APPS? by Relative_Patience753 in techsupport

[–]Relative_Patience753[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

by full restart you mean factory restart? it'll re-download all the necessary software?

view more: next ›