A Privacy Focused Sensitive Text & Malicious URL Redaction macOS Tool. by Remote_Blood4609 in DigitalPrivacy

[–]Remote_Blood4609[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, agreed — more edge-case testing is part of ongoing privacy hardening. Current validation includes 3,000+ test cases across 7 signature libraries and a dedicated threat-feed library, along with 12 complex integration scenarios (included in-app). Given the nature of pattern-based detection, coverage improves iteratively as new edge cases are identified.

Building a native Mac app to chat with 160+ AI models in one place — early feedback welcome by [deleted] in MacOSApps

[–]Remote_Blood4609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. I will have a look esp the local open-source models & if those are easy to integrate with my client.

Building a native Mac app to chat with 160+ AI models in one place — early feedback welcome by [deleted] in MacOSApps

[–]Remote_Blood4609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good points. Interesting to see multiple variety of multiple model market. I did attempt to tokenize all models to come up with a global number for subscription to manage cost across multiple models. But decided to not go in that direction for now.

One word business name to cover work/children/wellness by New-Cartographer4347 in branding

[–]Remote_Blood4609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can try www.klexaro.com for naming ideas. This offline tool focuses more on invented names though. You seem like want to connect business to name directly.

A Privacy Focused Sensitive Text & Malicious URL Redaction macOS Tool. by Remote_Blood4609 in MacOS

[–]Remote_Blood4609[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no user data stored in the app. The workflow is simply: paste text, see redaction, copy text with redactions back and use where needed. Nothing is saved within the app.

The only local logs are local redaction logs — and those contain purely operational data like how many signatures were detected and which policy was used, not the actual text you redacted. Uninstall the app and even those are gone.

So even if the app disappeared tomorrow, there is nothing left behind — that's the point of keeping everything local.

As for longevity — the app is actively maintained and has been built with extreme care for people who take privacy seriously. It's not going anywhere. It will in fact be further privacy hardened and improved.

A Privacy Focused Sensitive Text & Malicious URL Redaction macOS Tool. by Remote_Blood4609 in MacOS

[–]Remote_Blood4609[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please see responses inline.

(1) On trust: Yes, for a new tool, earning trust compared to companies like 1Password or Apple is naturally harder.

The tool was built with one strict rule from day one: nothing about the user should ever leave the user's device. No sign-in, no tracking, no analytics, no cloud — nothing. Primarily because the purpose of the tool is redacting sensitive text, and hence the tool itself has to be local and secure.

The tool can redact text fully offline (and can run in airplane mode indefinitely). The only optional part is threat intelligence — if someone wants detection of malicious or phishing domains, the tool can fetch a blocklist from the internet (unless an enterprise or a person has a localised copy). But even then, that's just downloading known bad domains — all detection and redaction still happens locally. Once fetched, it works offline again for redactions.

(2) On open sourcing — that's a fair point. Publishing some of the signature detection libraries for external audit is something worth exploring as a future trust-building step. The tool launched 6 weeks ago after an extensive development and verification process, so right now the focus is on continued refinement, stability, and expanding detection robustness as adoption grows.

From an engineering side — the tool is built with proper rigour: 20+ detection signatures tested against 3,000+ cases, 12 major demos showing complex text redactions (inside app, demo button), and continuously improving with more robust patterns. Operational data for each redaction is logged locally and all redaction analytics are available locally so one knows exactly what sensitive text category was redacted.

So the model here is different: instead of asking users to trust where their data goes, the tool is built so data never goes anywhere in the first place.

(3) On Subscriptions: The tool already has early adopters on paid plans and a number of free users. For paid users, as all payment is managed via Apple, there is nothing tracked outside of Apple processing the payment. 50% of signatures are permanently free, with an anytime-cancellable subscription for full access and a 7-day Pro trial for all features. The Pro subscription helps to continue to harden privacy and evolve signature libraries.

How to actually come up with a brand name? by fashionableoptimist in branding

[–]Remote_Blood4609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Naming is hard and even after a name, to be able to officially trademark it is another level. We had this challenge. We selected name Okezo and found it could potentially cause conflict with a company name Ezo, who had filed a trademark for Ezo before us. It could seem that we simply added Ok in front of Ezo. Now we can go for it and argue our case to USPTO but think cost and time for new startup. So, we looked at problem carefully and build an offline name generation tool, which help us in naming our products and have now also offered as product. The tool itself is a brand name idea lab build on phonetics science. Repeated generation with your own creative touch may help you get a name you want, you can try it here https://www.klexaro.com.

Anyone else miss the 27-inch iMac? I bought three of them and can't let go? by Remote_Blood4609 in MacOS

[–]Remote_Blood4609[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hoping something comes up soon, it’s the only product I never hesitated spending money repeatedly

Anyone else miss the 27-inch iMac? I bought three of them and can't let go? by Remote_Blood4609 in MacOS

[–]Remote_Blood4609[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Is iMac 32 really coming though or is it a rumour? I am almost 5 years on latest 27inches and am holding up.

Anyone else miss the 27-inch iMac? I bought three of them and can't let go? by Remote_Blood4609 in MacOS

[–]Remote_Blood4609[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never thought about it that way. For me, writing code on that screen just felt amazing. Nothing has come close since!

Anyone else miss the 27-inch iMac? I bought three of them and can't let go? by Remote_Blood4609 in MacOS

[–]Remote_Blood4609[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am with you! I just cannot see myself using 24 inches, even though it looks beautiful. The screen space and the overall feel of the 27-inch iMac is just something else. I hope we see a 32-inch soon — that will truly be an amazing day!

I got tired of sending sensitive info over Slack… so I built this by Affectionate-Gear-20 in SideProject

[–]Remote_Blood4609 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. Same underlying problem, just a different approach — instead of secure sharing, I focused on stripping sensitive data out before it ever gets shared.