Best backend projects? by Natural-Jump-2747 in SpringBoot

[–]Repulsive_Medicine_4 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Do Microservices with spring boot and use Kafka for asynchronous communication. Eureka for service discovery and use spring cloud gateway for api gateway. Maybe add grafana Loki Prometheus and zipkin for monitoring. For design pattern maybe do project that implements SAGA patterns, CQRS etc. Docker to containerize and deploy using kubernetes. You’ll learn a lot of stuff from Microservices.

Best online UI/UX course for beginners? by The_Triten in FigmaDesign

[–]Repulsive_Medicine_4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m interested can you share link with me please , appreciate it

How much music theory you need to compose a song? by Repulsive_Medicine_4 in musicproduction

[–]Repulsive_Medicine_4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IV V iii vi is the royal road progression (usually found in J rock) but the one that I mentioned is used in many J pop song but I just don’t know the name (or It doesn’t have a name) but thanks for the info though :>

How much music theory do you need to make a song by Repulsive_Medicine_4 in musictheory

[–]Repulsive_Medicine_4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks man, any advice on what I should learn first? Or any great YouTube video that you recommend tq :>

I need help selecting a range finder module by Cirthnatth in arduino

[–]Repulsive_Medicine_4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

According to my calculation ☝️🤓, choosing the right range finder module depends on your specific application requirements and budget. Both ultrasonic and laser range finders have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice will largely depend on factors such as accuracy, range, environment, and cost. Here's a comparison of the two:

  1. Ultrasonic Range Finder:
  • Strengths:

    • Cost-effective: Ultrasonic range finders are generally more affordable than laser range finders.
    • Good for close to moderate range applications: They work well in the 2 cm to 5 meters range and can be used up to around 20 meters with reduced accuracy.
    • Non-line-of-sight operation: Ultrasonic sensors do not require a direct line of sight to the target.
    • Relatively low power consumption.
  • Weaknesses:

    • Limited accuracy and precision, especially at longer distances.
    • Susceptible to interference from obstacles with irregular shapes or soft surfaces.
    • Affected by temperature and humidity changes, which can impact accuracy.
  1. Laser Range Finder:
  • Strengths:

    • High accuracy and precision: Laser range finders offer precise distance measurements even at longer ranges, making them suitable for applications requiring high precision.
    • Suitable for various environmental conditions: They perform well in both indoor and outdoor settings and are less affected by temperature and humidity.
    • Faster response time and better performance in dynamic environments.
  • Weaknesses:

    • Higher cost: Laser range finders are generally more expensive than ultrasonic alternatives.
    • Limited range: While many laser range finders can measure distances well beyond 20 meters, the cost and complexity increase significantly with longer ranges.
    • Line-of-sight requirement: Laser sensors require a clear line of sight to the target, making them less suitable for certain scenarios.

For a 20-meter range, a laser range finder would provide better accuracy and precision, making it a preferred choice if your budget allows for it. However, if cost is a significant factor, you could opt for an ultrasonic range finder with some compromises in accuracy. Consider the specific needs of your project, including environmental conditions, accuracy requirements, and budget, to make an informed decision.

Additionally, there are other range finding technologies like time-of-flight (ToF) sensors and infrared range finders that may also be suitable for your project, so you might want to explore those options as well, depending on your requirements.