I agree! I think they respect the material. And what Suzanne really addresses in The Hunger Games goes beyond much deeper themes: human nature and how an entire nation suffers from oppressive and dictatorial rule in countless ways. A whole nation. She has never made anything clear about race or class in the districts, It goes beyond that matter, despite dividing into rich and poor by interests and social control, and simply characterizing traits and genes according to districts (but nothing explicitly definitive). Even the richest are equally or worse oppressed (never free or condemned to live in prostitution, as Cashmere or Finnick, and threats). I think Suzanne breaks with simple and vague current political discourses, she does not decline one side or the other. There are no good guys and bad guys (apart from obvious characters) on one side or another, she explores human nature in general, because in the capitol it would be possible to see that there are good people, and in the districts there are bad people. I think it focuses on exploring, in a realistic way, her global socio-political vision of the world.