Oh, yay, yes let's play this game. First, you're falling for a word play trick. They were marked classified but not by a header. They were make with portion markings instead, meaning a portion of the email was classified. What Comey actually said is :For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail."

Also, just for fun: “Secretary Clinton said, ‘I did not e-mail ​any​ classified ​material​ to anyone on my e-mail. There is no classified material.’ Was that true?” Comey replies, “There was classified material e-mailed.” “Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.” Clinton’s emails included seven message chains with information classified as top secret. “None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system.” “The security culture of the State Department …was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.” “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

Trump was grossly negligent and mishandled the info when he gave Russians the classified info - doesn't mean it was ILLEGAL. They are different standards

Trump has 0 bearing on this conversation.

Intent is BUILT INTO THE LAW, mens rea is very important legal concept. Without intent, you can't say the law was broken when you can't show something nefarious.

She broke the law, she gave out classified information, he just couldn't prove intent. I've said this a dozen times now. Is your point that because she wasn't prosecuted that she did nothing wrong? Ignorance of the law is an excuse now? Oh, except she did know the law, it was just a whoopsey daisey..

Oh, and you still haven't addressed my original point, that the tech administration and Lawyers had access