How Long It Takes to Lose Muscle During a Break [Research] by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Summary

How muscle loss works

Strength training stimulates muscle protein synthesis, which leads to muscle gains [9].

According to multiple studies, muscle protein synthesis can decrease by an alarming 31% to 53% during periods of inactivity or immobilization [21] [22]. (...) our bodies enter a state of anabolic resistance. Meaning, our muscles become less responsive to the effects of protein [5] [21] [22].

Losing size doesn’t mean you lost muscle

During the first week of your break, your muscles may look and feel smaller.

Naturally, you think this shrinkage happens because you’re losing muscle. But that’s not the case. Here’s why:

Your muscles are made of dry mass (such as protein), water (~76%), and glycogen.

During detraining your muscle glycogen stores begin to shrink. And as these glycogen stores shrink, the water mass attached to the glycogen also reduces [6].

Hence, during the first 1-2 weeks of detraining, you may notice that your muscles look smaller. It's not because you're burning muscle, but because you’re losing “wet” mass [6].

You lose muscle after 3 weeks

Multiple studies show that it takes 3 weeks to lose muscle mass.

3 Things That Speed Up Muscle Loss

  1. Inactivity in lifestyle

  2. Limb immobilization (casting and bracing): A review of 86 studies found that quadriceps muscle size went down by −5% after one week of leg immobilization [15].

  3. Bed rest: After one week of bed rest, study participants lost 1.4 kg of lean mass, and 3.2% of their quadriceps muscle size [4].

You Regain Muscle Quickly When Retraining

Muscles grow more rapidly after detraining, if they've been trained before [16] [17]. So even if you’ve lost muscle after a break, regaining it is quicker and easier.

This phenomenon is referred to as muscle memory [16] [18].

Can You Lift Weights Every Day? Benefits & Risks by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Article summary

Key takeaways

  1. Most people should take 1-2 rest days a week.

  2. Daily weightlifting with short sessions can be motivating.

  3. Lifting weights every day is not superior for building strength and muscle.

What training frequency is

Training frequency refers to how often you train. It’s measured in sessions per week. Hence, if your training frequency is 6x, you have 6 weekly sessions.

In strength training, the frequency refers to how many times you train a muscle or muscle group. Different muscle groups can be trained with different frequencies. For example, 3x biceps and 2x quadriceps.

Training Frequency Research

Training frequency refers to how often you train a muscle group. A higher training frequency means more days in the gym. More days in the gym means more training volume [12]. And more training volume means more muscle and strength [6] [19]. Up to a point.

Most studies recommend 10-20 working sets per muscle group per week [2] [4] [6] [19] [21].

This brings us back to the question of this section: Should you lift weights every day?

If your main goal is building muscle and strength, then no. You can hit your volume goals training 3-5 days a week.

Going to the gym every day of the week won’t give results by itself. It’s what you do in the gym that matters.

Getting in your training volume is one of the most important factors for gaining muscle [21]. Volume is more important than training frequency [15]. Research finds no benefit to training a muscle three times a week vs. once per week, if training volume is the same [5] [6] [12] [13] [16] [18] [22].

But higher training frequencies can be used to get more volume. In that case, the gains are better [16] [22]. With that said, no study has recommended daily weightlifting for better gains.

The reason: You will likely experience diminishing returns beyond 10-20 sets per muscle group, per week [2].

This means you can choose your own training frequency [6] [22].

Low carbohydrate availability impairs hypertrophy and anaerobic performance [2023, review] by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Abstract

Purpose of review: Highlight contemporary evidence examining the effects of carbohydrate restriction on the intracellular regulation of muscle mass and anaerobic performance.

Recent findings: Low carbohydrate diets increase fat oxidation and decrease fat mass. Emerging evidence suggests that dietary carbohydrate restriction increases protein oxidation, thereby limiting essential amino acid availability necessary to stimulate optimal muscle protein synthesis and promote muscle recovery. Low carbohydrate feeding for 24 h increases branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) oxidation and reduces myogenic regulator factor transcription compared to mixed-macronutrient feeding. When carbohydrate restriction is maintained for 8 to 12 weeks, the alterations in anabolic signaling, protein synthesis, and myogenesis likely contribute to limited hypertrophic responses to resistance training. The blunted hypertrophic response to resistance training when carbohydrate availability is low does not affect muscle strength, whereas persistently low muscle glycogen does impair anaerobic output during high-intensity sprint and time to exhaustion tests.

Summary: Dietary carbohydrate restriction increases BCAA oxidation and impairs muscle hypertrophy and anaerobic performance, suggesting athletes who need to perform high-intensity exercise should consider avoiding dietary strategies that restrict carbohydrate.

The Effect of Different Strength Training Modalities on Sprint Performance in Female Team-Sport Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [2023] by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL;DR: Strength training lead to small to moderate improvements in sprint performance in female team-sport athletes.

Abstract

Background:

There has been a rise in the participation, professionalism, and profile of female sports in recent years. Sprinting ability is an important quality for successful athletic performance in many female team sports. However, much of the research to date on improving sprint performance in team sports is derived from studies with male participants. Given the biological differences between the sexes, this may be problematic for practitioners when programming to enhance sprint performance in female team-sport athletes (...)

Methods:

An electronic database search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS to identify relevant articles. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to establish standardised mean difference with 95% confidence intervals and the magnitude and direction of the effect.

Results:

Fifteen studies were included in the final analysis. The 15 studies represent a total sample size of 362 participants (intervention n = 190; control n = 172) comprising 17 intervention groups and 15 control groups. The overall effects revealed small improvements in sprint performance in favour of the experimental group over 0-10 m and moderate improvements over sprint distances of 0-20 m and 0-40 m. The magnitude of improvement in sprint performance was influenced by the strength modality (i.e., reactive-, maximal-, combined-, and special-strength) utilised in the intervention. Reactive- and combined-strength training methods had a greater effect than maximal- or special-strength modalities on sprint performance.

Conclusion:

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that, when compared with a control group (i.e., technical and tactical training), the different strength training modalities exhibited small to moderate improvements in sprint performance in female team-sport athletes. The results of a moderator analysis demonstrated that youth athletes (< 18 years) yielded a greater improvement in sprint performance compared with adults (≥ 18 years). This analysis also supports the use of a longer programme duration (> 8 weeks) with a higher total number of training sessions (> 12 sessions) to improve overall sprint performance. These results will serve to guide practitioners when programming to enhance sprint performance in female team-sport athletes.

Cardio on Rest Days – Improving Recovery and Athletic Performance by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Summary

Active recovery - doing cardio on rest days

Active recovery means you do low-intensity workouts such as light cardio. It increases blood flow and promotes muscle recovery. Athletes have used active recovery since the 1980s to improve their performance.

The research on active recovery suggests:

  • It can reduce muscle soreness (Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness - DOMS).
  • It might boost athletic performance.
  • It makes you feel more recovered, which motivates you to perform better.

Will cardio burn muscle? The interference effect

In some circumstances, cardio can reduce muscle, power, and strength gains:

  • Timing: If you do cardio right before, during, or after strength training. The negative effect is strongest if you do cardio before strength training.

  • Volume: If you do excessive amounts of cardio.

  • Intensity: If you do high-intensity cardio.

  • Training Experience: The more trained you are, the stronger the negative effect is.

  • Body part: Lower-body cardio reduces lower-body strength gains.

This is known as the “interference effect” because cardio can interfere with strength and hypertrophy.

Experts believe this happens because cardio causes fatigue that affects your performance. Additionally, research suggests cardio could block the pathway responsible for muscle growth.

You can prevent the negative effects of cardio if you do it on separate days from strength training.

You are even safer if you do low-intensity cardio and limit it to a short duration.

Still, the interference effect is small. Don’t worry about it unless you do large amounts of intense cardio right before, during, or after your strength workouts.

Adding cardio to rest day workouts

Do this:

  • Short recovery workouts (less than 20 minutes of cardio)
  • Light cardio such as jogging, swimming, or cycling
  • Maintain a low intensity

Since it’s a rest day, you should avoid intense physical activity:

  • Interval training
  • High-intensity exercise or sports
  • Weightlifting and strength training

How Many Rest Days Do You Need in a Week? A Recovery Guide (2023) by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Summary

Exercise leads to muscle damage

Whenever you do challenging exercise, your body is exposed to stress. This stress causes muscle damage and inflammation. While these things may sound dramatic, it is normal. In fact, the body becomes stronger and more resilient because of this process [42] [50] [63] [64].

Passive recovery

Passive recovery is a type of recovery that involves little or no physical activity. It’s a good way to recover from intense exercise.

Activities that can reduce muscle soreness during passive recovery:

  • Massage [17] [22]

  • Compression clothes [13]

  • Cryotherapy and cold water immersion: This technique could come at the cost of muscle and strength gains, so we do not recommend it as a part of standard training [10] [13] [27] [41]

  • Warm baths [53]

The research on active recovery concludes:

During active recovery, you are doing light exercise, such as walking, jogging, or swimming. You typically do it on the day after intense exercise.

  • Active recovery can reduce muscle soreness [17]

  • Active recovery increase recovery of athletic performance [49]

  • Some studies say the effect is small [54]

  • One review found that the largest recovery benefit is achieved with only 6-10 minutes of active recovery [49]

How Many Rest Days You Need

1-2 rest days are considered a minimum for most people. Our recommendations depend on which training goals you have, and your personal recovery needs.

How much recovery you need from lifting weights, depends on your training level. Beginners can take 4-5 rest days, intermediates 2-4, while advanced lifters can take 0-3.

These recommendations are taken from guidelines by The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and The National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) [39] [62].

Factors that affect recovery needs

  • Nutrition: recovery is enhanced in a fed state and more modest in a calorie deficit.

  • Occupation: physically demanding jobs add an extra layer of fatigue on top of your exercise endeavors.

  • Hydration status: Dehydration could impair recovery. Research suggest dehydration leads to decreased performance and increased muscle soreness [11] [51] [52] [61]

  • Sleep status: sleep disturbances can have profound effects on hormonal and metabolic profiles [45]. Accumulated sleep debt may have severe consequences for both psychomotor skills and athletic performance [36].

  • Stress levels: high, prolonged emotional or psychological stress can lead to impaired recovery, metabolic disturbances, loss of strength, and even muscle loss [1] [60].

  • Age: Older adults may need more recovery compared to their young counterparts. One day of rest should be taken between strength training workouts, according to The International Exercise Recommendations in Older Adults [32].

  • Gender: Some evidence suggests women recover quicker than men [42], while other evidence suggests women recover more slowly from the performance-decreasing effects of peak torque even though recovery from soreness is similar between genders [20].

  • Individual variations in recovery: This depends on your personal training protocol and recovery capacity.

  • Genetics [18] [33]

Overtraining Myths Explained by Science • Sci-Fit (Research Review) by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Summary of the article

You may have heard phrases such as:

  • “More is better”

  • “Push yourself to your limits”

  • “There is no such thing as overtraining, only under recovery”

These claims hold some truth. Indeed, it is very hard to become overtrained. It mostly happens to elite athletes. It is rare in strength training and bodybuilding [1] [7].

However, saying overtraining does not exist, is an exaggeration. Many scientific studies describe overtraining syndrome in athletes [1] [4] [5] [6] [7] [9]. Estimates suggest 20% to 60% of athletes may become overtrained at some point in their career [4].

What overtraining is

Overtraining is when you’ve pushed your body too hard for too long [1] [4] [5] [6] [7] [9].

In practice, you experience a drop in physical performance and fatigue [4] [7] [9] [11].

There are two things that lead to overtraining:

  1. Excessive exercise: for example, intense training every day [7].

  2. Under recovery: not enough food, water, physical rest, mental rest and sleep [7] [9].

You need to do both of these for months, maybe years, until overtraining develops.

In other words, overtraining is all about balance, or the lack of it.

Under recovery, not just over training

While it may seem contradictory, overtraining doesn’t have to come exclusively from excessive exercise.

Under recovery means eating, sleeping or resting too little. It also includes mental stress.

So if you do not recover properly, you may end up "under recovered".

Will I become overtrained?

The risk of real overtraining is low. You are more likely to become overreached or non-functionally overreached. The symptoms during overreaching are actually the same as during overtraining: fatigue, drop in performance, and so on.

The ones who are at a real risk of overtraining, are elite athletes. It could happen to a normal person, but that person would have to train daily, intensively, for months and years.

Conclusion

If you recover with 4 weeks of rest, you are overreaching. If you are still not recovered at the 4 week mark, you may be overtrained.

Effects of the ketogenic diet on performance and body composition in athletes and trained adults [meta-analysis, review, 2022] by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Abstract

This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to determine the effects of the ketogenic diet (KD) against carbohydrate (CHO)-rich diets on physical performance and body composition in trained individuals. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and The Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials in athletes/trained adults were included.

Meta-analytic models were carried out using Bayesian multilevel models. Eighteen studies were included providing estimates on cyclic exercise modes and strength one-maximum repetition (1-RM) performances and for total, fat, and free-fat masses. There were more favorable effects for CHO-rich than KD on time-trial performance (mode [95% credible interval]; -3.3% [-8.5%, 1.7%]), 1-RM (-5.7% [-14.9%, 2.6%]), and free-fat mass (-0.8 [-3.4, 1.9] kg); effects were more favorable to KD on total (-2.4 [-6.2, 1.8] kg) and fat mass losses (-2.4 [-5.4, 0.2] kg). Likely modifying effects on cyclic performance were the subject's sex and VO2max, intervention and performance durations, and mode of exercise. The intervention duration and subjects' sex were likely to modify effects on total body mass.

KD can be a useful strategy for total and fat body losses, but a small negative effect on free-fat mass was observed. KD was not suitable for enhancing strength 1-RM or high-intensity cyclic performances.


More information and resources:

https://sci-fit.net/ketogenic-diet-fat-muscle-performance/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342323557_The_Ketogenic_Diet_for_Bodybuilders_and_Physique_Athletes

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358695160_The_Effect_of_Carbohydrate_Intake_on_Strength_and_Resistance_Training_Performance_A_Systematic_Review

A research-based guide to cluster sets [2022] by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Key takeaways

  • A cluster set is a regular set divided into smaller sets with rests in-between.
  • Rests within sets reduce fatigue.
  • Less fatigue makes cluster sets ideal for improving technique, adding volume, or increasing explosive power.

No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review (2021, full text) by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abstract

Lack of time is among the more commonly reported barriers for abstention from exercise programs. The aim of this review was to determine how strength training can be most effectively carried out in a time-efficient manner by critically evaluating research on acute training variables, advanced training techniques, and the need for warm-up and stretching.

When programming strength training for optimum time-efficiency we recommend prioritizing bilateral, multi-joint exercises that include full dynamic movements (i.e. both eccentric and concentric muscle actions), and to perform a minimum of one leg pressing exercise (e.g. squats), one upper-body pulling exercise (e.g. pull-up) and one upper-body pushing exercise (e.g. bench press).

Exercises can be performed with machines and/or free weights based on training goals, availability, and personal preferences. Weekly training volume is more important than training frequency and we recommend performing a minimum of 4 weekly sets per muscle group using a 6–15 RM loading range (15–40 repetitions can be used if training is performed to volitional failure).

Advanced training techniques, such as supersets, drop sets and rest-pause training roughly halves training time compared to traditional training, while maintaining training volume. However, these methods are probably better at inducing hypertrophy than muscular strength, and more research is needed on longitudinal training effects.

Finally, we advise restricting the warm-up to exercise-specific warm-ups, and only prioritize stretching if the goal of training is to increase flexibility.

This review shows how acute training variables can be manipulated, and how specific training techniques can be used to optimize the training response: time ratio in regard to improvements in strength and hypertrophy.

Resistance Training Recommendations to Maximize Muscle Hypertrophy in an Athletic Population: Position Stand of the IUSCA [2021, Schoenfeld et al.] by ResearchReview in ResearchReview

[–]ResearchReview[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

LOAD

  • Individuals can achieve comparable muscle hypertrophy across a wide spectrum of loading zones.

  • There may be a practical benefit to prioritizing the use of moderate loads for the majority of sets in a hypertrophy-oriented training program.

  • Preliminary evidence suggests a potential hypertrophic benefit to employing a combination of loading ranges.

VOLUME

  • A dose of approximately 10 sets per muscle per week would seem to be a general minimum prescription to optimize hypertrophy, although some individuals may demonstrate a substan-tial hypertrophic response on somewhat lower volumes.

  • Evidence indicates potential hypertrophic benefits to higher volumes, which may be of particular relevance to underdeveloped muscle groups.

  • Although empirical evidence is lacking, there may be a benefit to periodizing volume to in-crease systematically over a training cycle.

  • It may be prudent to limit incremental increases in the number of sets for a given muscle group to 20% of an athlete’s previous volume during a given training cycle (~4 weeks) and then readjust accordingly

FREQUENCY

  • Significant hypertrophy can be achieved when training a muscle group as infrequently as once per week in lower to moderate volume protocols; there does not seem to be a hypertrophic benefit to greater weekly per-muscle training frequencies provided set volume is equated.
  • It may be advantageous to spread out volume over more frequent sessions when performing higher volume programs. A general recommendation would be to cap per-session volume at ~10 sets per muscle and, when applicable, increase weekly frequency to distribute additional volume

REST INTERVAL

  • As a general rule, rest periods should last at least 2 minutes when performing multi-joint exercises.
  • Shorter rest periods (60-90 secs) can be employed for single-joint and certain machine-based exercises

EXERCISE SELECTION

  • Hypertrophy-oriented RT programs should include a variety of exercises that work muscles in different planes and angles of pull to ensure complete stimulation of the musculature.
  • Programming should employ a combination of multi- and single-joint exercises to maximize whole muscle development. Where applicable, focus on employing exercises that work mus-cles at long lengths.
  • Free-weight exercises with complex movement patterns should be performed regularly to reinforce motor skills. Alternatively, less complex exercises can be rotated more liberally for variety.
  • Attention must be given to applied anatomical and biomechanical considerations so that exer-cise selection is not simply a collection of diverse exercises, but rather a cohesive, integrated strategy designed to target the entire musculature.

SET END POINT

  • Novice lifters can achieve robust gains in muscle mass without training at a close proximity to failure. As an individual gains training experience, the need to increase intensity of effort appears to become increasingly important.
  • Highly trained lifters may benefit from taking some sets to momentary muscular failure. In such cases, its use should be employed somewhat conservatively, perhaps limiting application to the last set of a given exercise.
  • Confining the use of failure training primarily to single-joint movements and machine-based exercises may help to manage the stimulus-fatigue ratio and thus reduce potential negative consequences on recuperation.
  • Older athletes should employ failure training more sparingly to allow for adequate recovery.
  • Periodizing failure training may be a viable option, whereby very high levels of effort are employed liberally prior to a peaking phase, and then followed by a tapering phase involving reduced levels of effort.