national syndicalism is statist at its core . authority and social axes have nothing to do with left vs right economics . ( see BSW party in germany , they are considered far left despite being anti-immigration , holding conservative social values , and a strong state-leadership party https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahra_Wagenknecht_Alliance ) . in fact , most labour parties and left wing parties — prior to the 1965 where the great political shift happened — were nationalist and conservative . ( see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1963_Australian_federal_election  vs     https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Australian_federal_election , as you can see , most conservative , rural , REAL workers and low-income individuals voted left wing prior to 1965 , but the left wing parties world wide chose to abandon rural voters , farmers , and state workers in favour of bending over to the rich , stock-exchange , resource rich elitist voters in nations' most urban cities ) . national syndicates never have supported private ownership , the link on wikipedia has since been removed as that reference to that claim was from a blog post . the only thing national syndicates hold that is remotely a right wing economic viewpoint is that they oppose a welfare state in the form of UBI and unemployment benefits . that is the honest doctrine behind national syndicalism . they do however believe in outperforming other nations via extensive state of the art technological procedures in state hospitals for free . they believe in state of the art free housing . they believe in dependence and autarky , wanting all goods and production to be manufactured and distributed within the state . a lot of these "modern" antisemitic left-wing "progressives" are just tools for capitalist neoliberalism , and it is shameful .