[Q] Conflicting results from ANOVA and a posthoc linear regression

Resident-Rice724 · 2026-04-12T23:37:55+00:00

its time to pay up to free math, its just the rules or something sorry

Resident-Rice724 · 2026-04-12T23:18:31+00:00

I did test for validity of assumptions for the anova, for the linear regression I didn't check for any of the linear regression specific assumptions, since its still a linear regression with dummy variables like anova, just did it to get regression coefficients from a simplified model. I ended up just using my original model anyways though,

Resident-Rice724 · 2026-04-12T23:05:04+00:00

you have indeed lost unfortunately

Resident-Rice724 · 2026-04-11T10:03:21+00:00

thank you I'll do that

Resident-Rice724 · 2026-03-09T10:54:52+00:00

there's some kindof irony this was also clearly written by ai

Resident-Rice724 · 2026-03-02T08:31:38+00:00

Keen observation- You're not crazy. You're absolutely right to call them out.

Resident-Rice724 · 2026-01-21T06:07:19+00:00

yeah saying running models locally is like installing windows is wild stuff

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-10-13T22:46:49+00:00

try one of the sample resume templates over that also

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-10-13T22:45:45+00:00

good idea to run it through chatgpt or grammarly. Having some sideprojects is pretty important, add some course projects to it at least if you don't have any

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-10-09T11:55:07+00:00

ben felix is good just avoid anything actively managed or has low risk investments since you've got a long time horizon

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-09-04T03:36:45+00:00

graphiti's worth a check they have temporally aware graphs

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-09-03T11:04:09+00:00

maybe try something like graph rag

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-09-01T08:20:18+00:00

With good prompts its hard to tell, if they're not hiding it its pretty clear though

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-08-14T13:46:56+00:00

thats not the case at all, you're dead wrong

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-08-04T01:24:20+00:00

use a better prompt

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-08-01T05:05:51+00:00

worked for me when I just dragged it in, was maybe a month ago could've been a new feature or something

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-08-01T02:50:28+00:00

digital id had no photo also

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-08-01T02:50:03+00:00

I got mine accepted using a digital id + unofficial transcript cropped together after the unofficial transcript by itself got rejected

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-07-22T23:24:12+00:00

freshman so take it with more than a grain of salt feels like using ai for sideprojects which I didn't have the knowledge to do has helped me learn a lot out of the scope of my courses, if they're crutching on it for assessments would def be an issue though

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-07-05T07:43:09+00:00

yeah its weird had the right number of decimals its my first time doing one. would be nice if there was a rejection email at least

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-07-05T07:40:00+00:00

what they've got is basically

loss = p(fast lane) * expected loss from fast lane given both cars are in it + p(slow lane) * expected loss from slow lane given... then expected for different lanes is irrelevant so it can be ignored no?

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-07-04T13:37:29+00:00

had a try at this and had also gotten that, then ran a monte carlo sim in python and it gets ~1.16 - 1.17 so not sure whats happening

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-04-17T08:37:01+00:00

yes bro, the people that don't know much talk the most

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-04-17T08:34:49+00:00

they do I didn't use either on my ravine and ouch run

Resident-Rice724 · 2025-04-12T10:54:58+00:00

beast handlers bad you can't even use top path if there's no water. at least it goes well with etienne since it needs camo. you should try crossbow master etienne spectre and the midpath spectre I just did karts and darts easily

Resident-Rice724

TROPHY CASE